本文選題：代孕 + 代理孕母　； 參考：《吉林大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：代孕作為人工輔助生殖技術(shù)的一項(xiàng)手段，其一誕生，便對(duì)世界各國(guó)的倫理道德、法律體系產(chǎn)生了強(qiáng)烈的沖擊，代孕技術(shù)發(fā)達(dá)的各國(guó)及地區(qū)對(duì)代孕是否應(yīng)合法化的爭(zhēng)論持續(xù)已久，并都在本國(guó)或地區(qū)的法律中體現(xiàn)了出來(lái)。我國(guó)代孕技術(shù)雖在20世紀(jì)80年代才出現(xiàn)，起步較晚，可是卻在短短十多年間突飛猛進(jìn)。就在2001年我國(guó)衛(wèi)生部做出了重大舉措，發(fā)布了《人類(lèi)輔助生殖技術(shù)管理辦法》和《人類(lèi)輔助生殖技術(shù)規(guī)范》兩個(gè)行政規(guī)章，在上述行政規(guī)章中均明確了對(duì)代孕的禁止態(tài)度，我國(guó)官方對(duì)之所以作出全面禁止代孕的規(guī)定的解釋?zhuān)阂皇墙勾袃H僅涉及極少部分人的利益，不會(huì)對(duì)多數(shù)人造成影響；二是代孕會(huì)帶來(lái)諸多問(wèn)題，不禁止，一旦出現(xiàn)問(wèn)題將難以解決。然而鑒于代孕技術(shù)對(duì)于人類(lèi)醫(yī)學(xué)史上的重要意義，以及其他各國(guó)對(duì)于代孕的立法態(tài)度不斷理性化，還考慮到我國(guó)尚屬于處于代孕立法的起步期，因此衛(wèi)生部出臺(tái)的相關(guān)政策并未經(jīng)過(guò)深思熟慮及客觀(guān)論證。具體體現(xiàn)兩方面：其一，所出臺(tái)政策效力過(guò)低，僅從行政規(guī)章的層面進(jìn)行規(guī)制，而法律層面上卻仍是真空狀態(tài)；其二，我國(guó)目前不孕不育的婦女呈現(xiàn)日益增多的趨勢(shì)，迫于傳統(tǒng)觀(guān)念的影響，現(xiàn)實(shí)中的代孕現(xiàn)象頻現(xiàn)，代孕并沒(méi)有因法律的禁止而偃旗息鼓，反而是在半明半暗的夾縫中，呈現(xiàn)出蓬勃發(fā)展的態(tài)勢(shì)。對(duì)其法律規(guī)制的缺乏，引發(fā)了諸多損害婦女權(quán)益，侵犯孩子利益的新情況。僅僅因代孕存在“副作用”，就一概予以禁止的做法，顯然弊大于利。由此可見(jiàn)，只有對(duì)代孕進(jìn)行合乎實(shí)際的法律規(guī)制，才能盡量減少不必要的糾紛和矛盾，最大程度地發(fā)揮其為人類(lèi)服務(wù)的功效。由于法律上的空缺，使得因代孕出現(xiàn)的道德、法律和經(jīng)濟(jì)問(wèn)題愈演愈烈。因此，只有在我國(guó)法律層面上對(duì)代孕合同制定行之有效的規(guī)定，才能在兼顧倫理道德和廣大群眾實(shí)際需要的情況下，讓代孕技術(shù)發(fā)揮其最大的積極作用。 本文從代孕合同的正當(dāng)性、各國(guó)立法的比較法分析來(lái)論證代孕的合理存在性和合法化必要性，共分三部分： 第一部分，從人性需要的角度，分析了作為一項(xiàng)造福人類(lèi)的輔助生殖技術(shù)，代孕和道德倫理上的矛盾是可以調(diào)解的，并證明了代孕符合人類(lèi)的價(jià)值觀(guān)取向；闡述了代孕合同的權(quán)利基礎(chǔ)，，從生育權(quán)和身體權(quán)的角度證明了代孕合同在法理上的合理性,生育權(quán)和身體權(quán)非有法定理由、非經(jīng)法定程序不能任意剝奪，從而闡釋了代孕合同合法性的權(quán)利基礎(chǔ)； 第二部分，具體闡述了各國(guó)家及地區(qū)的代孕立法態(tài)度和立法現(xiàn)狀，并從中總結(jié)出對(duì)我國(guó)代孕合同立法的一些啟示，并確認(rèn)了代孕行為的有限合法性，這是進(jìn)一步解決由代孕產(chǎn)生的具體問(wèn)題的前提； 第三部分，分析了我國(guó)現(xiàn)行立法的成功與不足，從實(shí)證主義的視野再次論證了代孕行為的合法性，并認(rèn)為從立法上的絕對(duì)禁止，到有限度的開(kāi)放代孕行為，部分地承認(rèn)其合法性，乃是世界各國(guó)立法的大勢(shì)所趨。對(duì)我國(guó)代孕合同合法化進(jìn)程中的立法原則及制度設(shè)計(jì)提出了建議。
[Abstract]:As a means of artificial assisted reproductive technology , the birth of surrogate pregnancy has produced a strong impact on the ethics and legal system of all countries in the world .
Second , surrogate pregnancy brings many problems , it is not forbidden , once the problem will be difficult to solve . However , in view of the important significance of surrogate technology in the history of human medicine , and other countries ' changing legislation attitude towards surrogate pregnancy , the relevant policies issued by the Ministry of Health have not been considered deeply and objectively .
Second , there is an increasing trend of women ' s infertility in our country , which is due to the influence of the traditional concept , the occurrence frequency of surrogate pregnancy in reality is not prohibited by law . Instead , it is a new situation that can minimize unnecessary disputes and conflicts . It is obvious that only the legal regulation of surrogate pregnancy can minimize unnecessary disputes and contradictions , so as to minimize unnecessary disputes and contradictions , so as to minimize unnecessary disputes and conflicts . Therefore , it is only necessary to make effective regulations on the contract of surrogate pregnancy on the legal level of our country , so as to give birth control technology the greatest positive role in the consideration of ethics and the actual needs of the broad masses .

Based on the legitimacy of the contract of surrogate pregnancy and the comparative analysis of national legislation , this article demonstrates the rational existence and legalization of surrogate pregnancy , which is divided into three parts :

In the first part , from the angle of human nature ' s needs , the author analyzes the contradiction between the assistant reproduction technology , the surrogate pregnancy and the moral ethics as a benefit man , and proves that the surrogate pregnancy accords with the human ' s value orientation ;
The article expounds the right foundation of the contract of surrogate pregnancy , from the point of view of the right of birth and body , it is proved that the rationality , the right of birth and the right of the body are not legally justified , and the legal procedure cannot be arbitrarily deprived , so as to explain the right foundation of the legality of the contract of surrogate pregnancy ;


In the second part , the legislation attitude and legislation status of surrogate pregnant women in various countries and regions are elaborated , and some inspiration to the legislation of surrogate pregnancy in China is summarized , and the limited legitimacy of the act of surrogate pregnancy is confirmed , which is the premise of further solving the specific problems caused by surrogate pregnancy ;


The third part , analyses the success and shortage of current legislation in our country , demonstrates the legality of the act of surrogate pregnancy again from the view of positivist view , and thinks that the absolute prohibition from the legislation , to the limited open generation act , partly acknowledges its legitimacy , is the trend of the national legislation of the world .
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：R173;D923.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張文顯;;關(guān)于權(quán)利和義務(wù)的思考[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);1988年03期

2 張衛(wèi)明;;羅爾斯分配理論的中國(guó)解讀[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2006年04期

3 楊立新;論公民身體權(quán)及其民法保護(hù)[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1994年06期

4 樊林;生育權(quán)探析[J];法學(xué);2000年09期

5 鄭娜;;論代孕子女法律地位之認(rèn)定[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年26期

6 楊芳;;人工生殖模式下親子法的反思與重建——從英國(guó)修訂《人類(lèi)受精與胚胎學(xué)法案》談起[J];河北法學(xué);2009年10期

7 張?jiān)缕?;淺析完全代孕的有條件合法化[J];寧波廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2009年03期

8 周琦;;羅爾斯差別原則的理論價(jià)值[J];學(xué)術(shù)界;2009年02期

9 譚桂珍;論“生育權(quán)”及其救濟(jì)[J];湘潭大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期

10 楊芳;張昕;潘榮華;;臺(tái)灣地區(qū)“代孕”立法最新進(jìn)展及其啟示[J];醫(yī)學(xué)與哲學(xué)(人文社會(huì)醫(yī)學(xué)版);2008年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 袁瑋;妊娠代理孕母的倫理問(wèn)題研究[D];中國(guó)協(xié)和醫(yī)科大學(xué);2007年

本文編號(hào)：2081865