接種門診人員和兒童家長對疑似預(yù)防接種異常反應(yīng)監(jiān)測知信行調(diào)查
本文選題:疑似預(yù)防接種異常反應(yīng)(AEFI) + 調(diào)查 ; 參考:《中國公共衛(wèi)生》2017年06期
【摘要】:目的了解接種門診人員和兒童家長對疑似預(yù)防接種異常反應(yīng)(AEFI)監(jiān)測的知識、態(tài)度和相關(guān)行為。方法 2015年12月—2016年1月,在江西贛州市對1 274名兒童家長和315名門診人員就AEFI監(jiān)測的知信行情況進(jìn)行問卷調(diào)查。結(jié)果 98.41%的接種門診人員知曉AEFI監(jiān)測定義,但僅有26.67%的人知曉報(bào)告卡上報(bào)時(shí)限;94.11%的家長知曉接種疫苗后現(xiàn)場留觀30 min,僅有61.30%的人知曉大部分不良反應(yīng)發(fā)生時(shí)間;在態(tài)度上,雙方均支持AEFI監(jiān)測工作,96.51%的門診人員和89.79%的家長認(rèn)為有必要開展AEFI監(jiān)測工作,參與度較好;相關(guān)行為方面,41.27%的門診人員存在懷疑為AEFI但未報(bào)告現(xiàn)象,該現(xiàn)象與接受培訓(xùn)次數(shù)有關(guān);未報(bào)告AEFI人員中有42.37%認(rèn)為AEFI監(jiān)測工作是額外負(fù)擔(dān),遠(yuǎn)高于報(bào)告過AEFI人員;兒童發(fā)生AEFI后家長報(bào)告意識較好,報(bào)告率達(dá)86.04%;17.97%的家長對癥狀輕的AEFI不報(bào)告,僅有42.70%的家長接種后留觀時(shí)間≥30 min,其中農(nóng)村家長較城區(qū)、鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)家長比例高,并與家長所持態(tài)度及相關(guān)知識知曉程度有關(guān)。結(jié)論應(yīng)加強(qiáng)門診人員的培訓(xùn)工作,強(qiáng)化接種前的告知及AEFI知識的宣傳工作。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the knowledge, attitude and related behavior of vaccination outpatients and parents of children in monitoring the suspected abnormal vaccination response (AEFI).Methods from December 2015 to January 2016, a questionnaire survey was conducted among 1 274 parents and 315 outpatients in Ganzhou City, Jiangxi Province.Results 98.41% of the vaccination outpatients knew the definition of AEFI surveillance, but only 26.67% knew that the reporting time limit of the report card was 94.11% and only 61.30% knew the time of occurrence of most adverse reactions.Both sides supported AEFI monitoring work, 96.51% of outpatients and 89.79% of parents thought it was necessary to carry out AEFI monitoring, and their participation was good, and 41.27% of outpatients suspected AEFI but did not report the phenomenon.This phenomenon was related to the number of training, 42.37% of the unreported AEFI personnel thought that the monitoring of AEFI was an extra burden, which was much higher than that of those who had reported AEFI, and the parents had a better sense of reporting after the occurrence of AEFI.Only 42.70% of the parents did not report AEFI with mild symptoms. Only 42.70% of the parents stayed for more than 30 mins after inoculation. The proportion of parents in rural areas was higher than that in urban areas, and the proportion of parents in villages and towns was higher, which was related to the attitude of parents and the degree of knowledge about them.Conclusion the training of outpatients should be strengthened, the information before inoculation and the propaganda of AEFI knowledge should be strengthened.
【作者單位】: 贛州市疾病預(yù)防控制中心免規(guī)科;崇義縣疾病預(yù)防控制中心免規(guī)科;
【分類號】:R186
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陳國風(fēng);預(yù)防接種異常反應(yīng)原因及對策[J];航空航天醫(yī)藥;2003年02期
2 莊菱;郭飚;劉大衛(wèi);曹玲生;曹雷;;全國預(yù)防接種異常反應(yīng)監(jiān)測省級師資培訓(xùn)效果評估[J];中國計(jì)劃免疫;2006年03期
3 ;預(yù)防接種異常反應(yīng)鑒定辦法[J];藥物不良反應(yīng)雜志;2008年05期
4 曾雪霞;孫蓮英;李俊;符振旺;;海南省2007年疑似預(yù)防接種異常反應(yīng)監(jiān)測分析[J];中國疫苗和免疫;2009年01期
5 單景霞;;常見預(yù)防接種異常反應(yīng)的處理[J];哈爾濱醫(yī)藥;2009年03期
6 郝晉萍;張江平;陳渝;;云南省預(yù)防接種異常反應(yīng)鑒定工作概況[J];衛(wèi)生軟科學(xué);2010年01期
7 臧焰;;探討預(yù)防接種異常反應(yīng)鑒定方法的特點(diǎn)[J];中國衛(wèi)生法制;2010年03期
8 劉雪梅;肖文芳;龔富強(qiáng);朱秀蘭;;惠州市預(yù)防接種異常反應(yīng)監(jiān)測系統(tǒng)人力資源狀況調(diào)查分析[J];中國醫(yī)藥導(dǎo)刊;2010年04期
9 蔣雪峰;陶志華;陳其龍;姚鳳燕;;平湖市疑似預(yù)防接種異常反應(yīng)監(jiān)測[J];中國疫苗和免疫;2011年02期
10 張世英;;深圳市預(yù)防接種異常反應(yīng)處理工作現(xiàn)狀及對策[J];中國公共衛(wèi)生管理;2012年01期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前6條
1 吳月臺;周文龍;;淺談?lì)A(yù)防接種異常反應(yīng)鑒定與醫(yī)療事故技術(shù)鑒定的異同[A];2011年浙江省醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)醫(yī)學(xué)倫理學(xué)與衛(wèi)生法學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文匯編[C];2011年
2 張世英;;深圳市預(yù)防接種異常反應(yīng)處理工作的現(xiàn)狀、問題及對策[A];2012深圳市預(yù)防醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文匯編[C];2012年
3 張世英;;深圳市預(yù)防接種異常反應(yīng)處理工作的現(xiàn)狀、問題及對策[A];2012廣東省預(yù)防醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)資料匯編[C];2013年
4 顧秀月;孫廣河;董慶梅;;一例接種水痘疫苗后發(fā)生疑似預(yù)防接種異常反應(yīng)死亡的調(diào)查[A];中華預(yù)防醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)石油系統(tǒng)分會(huì)第七屆預(yù)防醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)交流會(huì)論文集[C];2011年
5 陸國平;李e,
本文編號:1753042
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/yufangyixuelunwen/1753042.html