本文選題：鞏膜長(zhǎng)隧道途徑　切入點(diǎn)：鞏膜瓣途徑　出處：《福建醫(yī)科大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：【目的】觀(guān)察比較經(jīng)鞏膜瓣下穿刺口置入Ahmed青光眼閥(AGV)與經(jīng)鞏膜長(zhǎng)隧道置入AGV治療新生血管性青光眼(NVG)的療效及并發(fā)癥等。 【方法】將20例(20只眼)NVG患者隨機(jī)均分為二組，分別經(jīng)鞏膜瓣下穿刺口及經(jīng)鞏膜長(zhǎng)隧道置入AGV，術(shù)后3d，7d，1m，3m，6m，12m檢查視力、眼壓及裂隙燈檢查等。 【結(jié)果】隨防1～29個(gè)月，平均11.6個(gè)月。鞏膜瓣組患者末次隨訪(fǎng)眼壓由術(shù)前(49.7±8.33)mmHg降至(17.0±8.97)mmHg，手術(shù)前后眼壓差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)；鞏膜長(zhǎng)隧道組患者末次隨訪(fǎng)眼壓由術(shù)前(46.2±7.04)mmHg降至(18.5±7.78)mmHg，，手術(shù)前后眼壓差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)；二組患者術(shù)后眼壓相較差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)。鞏膜長(zhǎng)隧道組患者低眼壓性淺前房的發(fā)生率較鞏膜瓣組低，其差異具統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)，其余并發(fā)癥的發(fā)生率，如前房積血，高眼壓等，二組相較無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)。 【結(jié)論】通過(guò)二種途徑置入AGV治療NVG降低眼壓效果相當(dāng)，但經(jīng)鞏膜長(zhǎng)隧道置入其操作更簡(jiǎn)便、局部組織損傷更輕、材料成本更低、術(shù)后早期低眼壓性淺前房的發(fā)生率更少，或可成為房水引流物置入的新方法。
[Abstract]:[objective] to compare the curative effect and complications of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation via subscleral valve and AGV implantation through long scleral tunnel in the treatment of neovascular glaucoma. [methods] Twenty patients with NVG were randomly divided into two groups: subscleral puncture orifice and transscleral long tunnel were implanted into AGV.The visual acuity, intraocular pressure and slit lamp were examined 3 days after operation. [results] after 1 ~ 29 months of prevention, The IOP of scleral flap group decreased from 49.7 鹵8.33)mmHg to 17.0 鹵8.97mm Hg, and the IOP of scleral tunnel group decreased from 46.2 鹵7.04)mmHg to 18.5 鹵7.78mmHg.The IOP of scleral long tunnel group decreased from 46.2 鹵7.04)mmHg to 18.5 鹵7.78mmHg before and after operation. There was no significant difference in IOP between the two groups. The incidence of hypotony shallow anterior chamber in scleral long tunnel group was lower than that in scleral flap group. The difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). The incidence of other complications, such as hyphema and high intraocular pressure, was not statistically significant in the two groups. [conclusion] the effect of AGV implantation in the treatment of NVG is comparable, but the operation of long tunnel through sclera is easier, the local tissue injury is lighter, the cost of materials is lower, and the incidence of early low IOP shallow anterior chamber is less. It may be a new method for drainage of aqueous humor.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：福建醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：R779.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 趙琪;李靜敏;王慧珠;;Ahmed青光眼引流閥植入術(shù)治療難治性青光眼的臨床療效觀(guān)察[J];大連醫(yī)科大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

2 周和政;張文強(qiáng);周雄;陳云輝;;Ahmed青光眼閥植入術(shù)后早期盤(pán)周包裹的針刺分離治療[J];國(guó)際眼科雜志;2007年06期

3 裴澄,孫乃學(xué);房水引流植入物的研究進(jìn)展[J];國(guó)外醫(yī)學(xué).眼科學(xué)分冊(cè);2000年05期

4 王貞;葉天才;劉偉;秦章鵬;;Ahmed閥植入術(shù)治療難治性青光眼的臨床觀(guān)察[J];江西醫(yī)藥;2009年01期

5 周衛(wèi)為;張慶平;;HAD房水引流物植入術(shù)治療新生血管性青光眼觀(guān)察[J];臨床眼科雜志;2005年05期

6 于蘭;袁小江;廖明星;;經(jīng)鞏膜隧道HAD房水引流物植入術(shù)治療難治性青光眼的療效觀(guān)察[J];實(shí)用醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2011年08期

7 熊新春;胡義珍;席祖蓮;苗娟;張海江;魏厚仁;;Ahmed青光眼閥盤(pán)周纖維包裹二次手術(shù)后的臨床分析[J];眼視光學(xué)雜志;2006年02期

8 歸東梅,高殿文,聶慶珠,楊樝,李迅;透明質(zhì)酸鈉在房水引流物植入術(shù)中的應(yīng)用[J];中國(guó)實(shí)用眼科雜志;2005年11期

9 段宣初，蔣幼芹;國(guó)產(chǎn)HAD房水引流置入物治療新生血管性青光眼療效觀(guān)察[J];中國(guó)實(shí)用眼科雜志;1996年04期

本文編號(hào)：1679541