腹腔鏡完全腹膜外腹股溝疝修補術（TEP）與局麻下開放式無張力疝修補術的對比研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-11-20 07:50
【摘要】：目的：通過比較腹腔鏡完全腹膜外腹股溝疝修補術(Totally Extraperitoneal Prosthetic, TEP)與局麻下開放式無張力疝修補術治療成人腹股溝疝的臨床療效,探求哪一種成人腹股溝疝修補術更加高效、合理、經濟。方法：收集北京大學深圳醫(yī)院2012年10月至2014年10月所進行的60例TEP術(TEP組)和60例局麻下開放式無張力疝修補術(局麻開放組)進行同期非隨機對照研究。術后通過門診和電話聯系的方式對兩組患者進行隨訪,比較兩組患者術前、術中、術后的相關參數。結果：TEP組對比局麻開放組,手術時間長[(71±9.8)min VS (48±15.6)min (P 0.01)];術中出血量多[(16±8.8)ml VS(11±4.5)ml(P0.01)]；術后初次下床活動時間短[(7±6.4)h VS(13±7.2)h(P0.01)]；術后第1天VAS疼痛評分低[(2±0.6)VS(4±0.7),(P0.01)]；術后住院時間長[(4±0.8)d VS(3±1.2)d(P0.05)]；住院費用高[(8755±329)元VS(5462±298)元(P0.01)]；術后使用止痛藥例數差異無統(tǒng)計學意義[6.7%(4/60)VS 10%(6/60)(P0.05)]。術后隨訪周期在2-24個月,中位隨訪時間為16個月。TEP組術后的總并發(fā)癥為7例,分別為：陰囊積液者3例,尿潴留者2例,腸梗阻者1例,復發(fā)者1例；局麻開放組術后的總并發(fā)癥7例,分別為：陰囊積液2例,尿潴留1例,切口血腫1例,慢性疼痛1例,射精痛1例,復發(fā)1例。兩組總并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率差異無統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05)。結論：TEP是眾多腹腔鏡疝修補手術中較為理想的術式,安全有效,而局麻下開放式無張力疝修補術同樣具有TEP無法比擬的優(yōu)勢。兩種術式各有特點,在臨床應用上具有互補性,均值得臨床推薦使用。在具體的手術方式選擇上,醫(yī)師應該根據患者的具體情況,為其制定個性化的治療方案,這樣才能達到最佳的臨床效果和衛(wèi)生經濟學效益。
[Abstract]:Objective: to compare the clinical effects of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (Totally Extraperitoneal Prosthetic, TEP) and open tension-free hernia repair under local anesthesia in adult inguinal hernia and to find out which adult inguinal hernia repair is more effective. Reasonable, economical. Methods: 60 cases of TEP (TEP group) and 60 cases of open tension-free herniorrhaphy under local anesthesia (open group) were collected from October 2012 to October 2014 in Shenzhen Hospital of Peking University. The two groups were followed up by outpatient service and telephone contact after operation, and the parameters before, during and after operation were compared. Results: compared with the open local anesthesia group, the operation time of TEP group was longer (71 鹵9.8) min VS (48 鹵15.6) min (P 0.01), and the amount of intraoperative bleeding was more (16 鹵8.8) ml VS (11 鹵4.5) ml (P 0.01). The first time of getting out of bed was short (7 鹵6.4) h VS (13 鹵7.2) h (P0.01), the VAS pain score was low on the first day after operation [(2 鹵0.6) VS (4 鹵0.7), (P0.01)]. The postoperative hospitalization time was long [(4 鹵0.8) d VS () 3 鹵1.2) d (P0.05], the hospitalization cost was high [(8755 鹵329) yuan VS (5462 鹵29.8) yuan (P0.01)]; There was no significant difference in the number of painkillers used after operation [6.7% (4 / 60) VS 10% (6 / 60) (P0.05)]. The postoperative follow-up period was 2-24 months and the median follow-up time was 16 months. In TEP group, the total postoperative complications were: scrotal effusion in 3 cases, urinary retention in 2 cases, intestinal obstruction in 1 case, recurrence in 1 case; In the open local anesthesia group, the total complications were scrotum effusion (2 cases), urinary retention (1 case), incision hematoma (1 case), chronic pain (1 case), ejaculation (1 case) and recurrence (1 case). There was no significant difference in the incidence of total complications between the two groups (P0.05). Conclusion: TEP is an ideal technique for laparoscopic herniorrhaphy, which is safe and effective, and open tension-free hernia repair under local anesthesia is also superior to TEP. The two types of operation have their own characteristics and complementary in clinical application, which are worthy of clinical recommendation. In the selection of specific surgical methods, doctors should make individualized treatment plans for patients according to their specific conditions, so as to achieve the best clinical effect and health economic benefits.
【學位授予單位】：安徽醫(yī)科大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：R656.2
本文編號：2344307
[Abstract]:Objective: to compare the clinical effects of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (Totally Extraperitoneal Prosthetic, TEP) and open tension-free hernia repair under local anesthesia in adult inguinal hernia and to find out which adult inguinal hernia repair is more effective. Reasonable, economical. Methods: 60 cases of TEP (TEP group) and 60 cases of open tension-free herniorrhaphy under local anesthesia (open group) were collected from October 2012 to October 2014 in Shenzhen Hospital of Peking University. The two groups were followed up by outpatient service and telephone contact after operation, and the parameters before, during and after operation were compared. Results: compared with the open local anesthesia group, the operation time of TEP group was longer (71 鹵9.8) min VS (48 鹵15.6) min (P 0.01), and the amount of intraoperative bleeding was more (16 鹵8.8) ml VS (11 鹵4.5) ml (P 0.01). The first time of getting out of bed was short (7 鹵6.4) h VS (13 鹵7.2) h (P0.01), the VAS pain score was low on the first day after operation [(2 鹵0.6) VS (4 鹵0.7), (P0.01)]. The postoperative hospitalization time was long [(4 鹵0.8) d VS () 3 鹵1.2) d (P0.05], the hospitalization cost was high [(8755 鹵329) yuan VS (5462 鹵29.8) yuan (P0.01)]; There was no significant difference in the number of painkillers used after operation [6.7% (4 / 60) VS 10% (6 / 60) (P0.05)]. The postoperative follow-up period was 2-24 months and the median follow-up time was 16 months. In TEP group, the total postoperative complications were: scrotal effusion in 3 cases, urinary retention in 2 cases, intestinal obstruction in 1 case, recurrence in 1 case; In the open local anesthesia group, the total complications were scrotum effusion (2 cases), urinary retention (1 case), incision hematoma (1 case), chronic pain (1 case), ejaculation (1 case) and recurrence (1 case). There was no significant difference in the incidence of total complications between the two groups (P0.05). Conclusion: TEP is an ideal technique for laparoscopic herniorrhaphy, which is safe and effective, and open tension-free hernia repair under local anesthesia is also superior to TEP. The two types of operation have their own characteristics and complementary in clinical application, which are worthy of clinical recommendation. In the selection of specific surgical methods, doctors should make individualized treatment plans for patients according to their specific conditions, so as to achieve the best clinical effect and health economic benefits.
【學位授予單位】：安徽醫(yī)科大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：R656.2
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 朱麗丹;吳立勝;汪宏;張俊松;;完全腹膜外腹腔鏡疝修補術(TEP)的學習曲線分析[J];安徽醫(yī)藥;2013年08期
2 郭偉昌;鄭國安;劉忠和;;局麻無張力疝修補術治療老年病人腹股溝疝34例診治體會[J];臨床和實驗醫(yī)學雜志;2010年02期
3 宋賽花;張小琴;倪春華;;局麻下腹腔鏡完全腹膜外疝修補術的圍手術期護理[J];實用臨床醫(yī)藥雜志;2011年14期
4 李軍;許加友;;局麻下無張力疝修補術的臨床研究[J];中國現代醫(yī)生;2008年22期
5 彭開勤,張應天;Shouldice 手術方法及應用體會[J];中國實用外科雜志;1997年05期
6 陳杰,那冬鳴,申英末,李杰,易秉強,樊華;局部神經阻滯麻醉在腹股溝無張力疝修補術中的應用[J];中華普通外科雜志;2005年02期
7 馬方;周愛青;車永芳;;兩種不同麻醉方式下腹股溝疝無張力修補術效果比較[J];中國臨床醫(yī)生;2011年08期
8 李健文;;腔鏡疝修補術中應注意的問題[J];中華疝和腹壁外科雜志(電子版);2009年03期
9 劉洋;汪燕;李彥宏;;改良無張力疝修補術對疝修補術后慢性疼痛的影響[J];中華疝和腹壁外科雜志(電子版);2013年02期
10 崔敏;鐘晗;蘇穎杰;逄曉云;劉曉琰;;綜合干預對圍手術期抗菌藥物預防使用的影響[J];中國藥物警戒;2014年01期
，本文編號：2344307
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/waikelunwen/2344307.html
最近更新
教材專著
