【摘要】：目的:比較Inching技術(shù)與其他神經(jīng)傳導(dǎo)檢測(NCSs)技術(shù)在腕管綜合征(CTS)診斷中的價(jià)值。方法:對(duì)41例CTS患者和32例正常對(duì)照者均進(jìn)行Inching技術(shù)、常規(guī)法及比較法的神經(jīng)傳導(dǎo)檢測,并比較三者診斷CTS的敏感性及特異性。結(jié)果:(1)CTS組與對(duì)照組進(jìn)行常規(guī)法與比較法的NCS結(jié)果比較:CTS組中應(yīng)用常規(guī)法檢測的正中神經(jīng)末端感覺、運(yùn)動(dòng)傳導(dǎo)潛伏期以及應(yīng)用比較法檢測的正中神經(jīng)與同一肢體的尺神經(jīng)或橈神經(jīng)感覺或運(yùn)動(dòng)傳導(dǎo)潛伏期差值均長于對(duì)照組,差異顯著(P0.01);CTS組的正中神經(jīng)前臂段運(yùn)動(dòng)傳導(dǎo)速度慢于對(duì)照組,差異顯著(P0.01)。(2)CTS組與對(duì)照組手腕部正中神經(jīng)Inching技術(shù)檢測結(jié)果比較:CTS組在腕下2cm至腕下3cm節(jié)段及腕管內(nèi)節(jié)段平均每厘米的潛伏期差值均長于對(duì)照組,差異性非常顯著(P0.01)。(3)CTS組各NCS指標(biāo)敏感性、特異性比較:以手腕部正中神經(jīng)Inching技術(shù)檢測的敏感性最高,尤其是感覺Inching技術(shù)的檢測敏感性(95.1%)與常規(guī)法及比較法的NCS指標(biāo)比較,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),而在應(yīng)用常規(guī)法及比較法進(jìn)行的運(yùn)動(dòng)神經(jīng)傳導(dǎo)檢測指標(biāo)中以2LI-MDLD的檢測敏感性(80.5%)為最高。結(jié)論:(1)2LI-MDLD是診斷CTS最有價(jià)值的運(yùn)動(dòng)NCS技術(shù)。(2)Inching技術(shù)對(duì)于CTS定位診斷的敏感性明顯優(yōu)于常規(guī)法及比較法的NCS技術(shù),可作為篩查和確診CTS的特定工具。
[Abstract]:Objective: To compare the value of Inching technique and other nerve conduction detection (NCSs) technique in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Methods: 41 cases of CTS and 32 normal controls were performed Inching technique, routine and comparative method of nerve conduction detection, and the sensitivity and specificity of three cases of CTS were compared. Results: (1) CTS group and control group The NCS results of routine method and comparison method were compared: the difference between the median nerve terminal sense of the median nerve in the CTS group, the latent period of motor conduction and the difference between the ulnar nerve or the radial nerve of the same limb was longer than that of the control group, and the difference was significant (P0.01), and the middle God of group CTS was in the middle of the group. The motor conduction velocity of the forearm segment was slower than that of the control group (P0.01). (2) the difference between the CTS group and the control group was compared with the median nerve Inching technique in the control group: the difference between the CTS group from 2cm to the 3cm segment of the wrist and the average of each centimeter in the carpal canal was longer than the control group, and the difference was very significant (P0.01). (3) the NCS index of CTS group was sensitive. Sensitivity and specificity: the sensitivity of the Inching technique of the median nerve in the wrist is the highest, especially the sensitivity of the sensory Inching technique (95.1%), compared with the NCS index of the conventional method and the comparison method (P0.05), but in the use of conventional and comparative methods of motor nerve conduction detection, 2LI-MDLD The sensitivity of detection (80.5%) is the highest. Conclusion: (1) 2LI-MDLD is the most valuable NCS technique for the diagnosis of CTS. (2) the sensitivity of Inching to CTS localization diagnosis is obviously better than that of conventional and comparative NCS technology, which can be used as a specific tool for screening and diagnosing CTS.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：福建醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：R688

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳鋼;;腕管綜合征的神經(jīng)電生理臨床探討[J];當(dāng)代醫(yī)學(xué);2010年28期

2 鄭燕麗;畢曉芳;李小麗;;62例肘管綜合征的神經(jīng)電生理分析[J];光明中醫(yī);2009年09期

3 劉乾仁;劉志剛;;正中神經(jīng)返支卡壓征的診斷(附2例報(bào)告)[J];吉林醫(yī)學(xué);2011年04期

4 駱耐香,秦小云,周思,蘭羚元;腕管綜合征的解剖學(xué)基礎(chǔ)[J];解剖與臨床;2005年03期

5 丁遠(yuǎn)英;谷文萍;;35例腕管綜合征的神經(jīng)電生理分析[J];腦與神經(jīng)疾病雜志;2010年02期

6 湯群英;于建剛;;腕管綜合征的肌電圖與臨床分析[J];中國實(shí)用神經(jīng)疾病雜志;2012年23期

7 鄒藝;李莉;;短段傳導(dǎo)時(shí)間測定對(duì)肘管綜合征的診斷價(jià)值[J];海南醫(yī)學(xué);2012年23期

8 張慧文;李峗;羅清宇;;45例正中神經(jīng)腕管卡壓神經(jīng)電生理檢測與臨床分析[J];中國實(shí)用神經(jīng)疾病雜志;2013年09期

9 王麗欣;韓雪松;丁魯;;應(yīng)用神經(jīng)電生理監(jiān)測腕管綜合征治療效果[J];齊齊哈爾醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年08期

10 王麗欣;韓雪松;丁魯;;應(yīng)用神經(jīng)電生理診斷肘管綜合征(附101例病例分析)[J];齊齊哈爾醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年09期

，

本文編號(hào)：2159500