【摘要】：背景:股神經(jīng)阻滯在全膝關節(jié)置換術圍手術期鎮(zhèn)痛中的有效性得到廣泛認可,但對于聯(lián)合坐骨神經(jīng)阻滯的必要性一直存在爭議。目的:探討股神經(jīng)聯(lián)合坐骨神經(jīng)阻滯在全膝關節(jié)置換圍手術期多模式鎮(zhèn)痛中的鎮(zhèn)痛效果及對功能鍛煉的影響。方法:將150例擬行全膝關節(jié)置換的患者隨機分為3組,每組50例。全麻組術前行常規(guī)全麻;股神經(jīng)阻滯組在全麻前行術側(cè)股神經(jīng)阻滯;股神經(jīng)+坐骨神經(jīng)阻滯組在全麻前分別行術側(cè)股神經(jīng)、坐骨神經(jīng)阻滯。比較3組患者術后靜息、運動狀態(tài)下的目測類比評分,膝關節(jié)主動活動度,術后住院天數(shù),不良反應及復診時的膝關節(jié)HSS評分。結(jié)果與結(jié)論:(1)股神經(jīng)阻滯組、股神經(jīng)+坐骨神經(jīng)阻滯組術后各時間點靜息、運動目測類比評分均顯著低于全麻組(P0.05),股神經(jīng)+坐骨神經(jīng)阻滯組顯著低于股神經(jīng)阻滯組(P0.05);(2)股神經(jīng)阻滯組、股神經(jīng)+坐骨神經(jīng)阻滯組術后各時間點膝關節(jié)主動活動度均顯著大于全麻組(P0.05),股神經(jīng)+坐骨神經(jīng)阻滯組顯著大于股神經(jīng)阻滯組(P0.05);(3)股神經(jīng)阻滯組、股神經(jīng)+坐骨神經(jīng)阻滯組術后住院天數(shù)均顯著少于全麻組(P0.05),股神經(jīng)+坐骨神經(jīng)阻滯組顯著少于股神經(jīng)阻滯組(P0.05);(4)術后1個月時,股神經(jīng)阻滯組、股神經(jīng)+坐骨神經(jīng)阻滯組的膝關節(jié)HSS評分均顯著高于全麻組(P0.05),股神經(jīng)+坐骨神經(jīng)阻滯組顯著高于股神經(jīng)阻滯組(P0.05);術后3個月和6個月時,3組間的膝關節(jié)HSS評分差異無顯著性意義(P0.05);(5)結(jié)果提示,與全麻及股神經(jīng)阻滯相比,股神經(jīng)聯(lián)合坐骨神經(jīng)阻滯在全膝置換圍手術期多模式鎮(zhèn)痛中有更好的術后鎮(zhèn)痛效果,為全膝關節(jié)置換患者術后早期功能鍛煉提供了有利條件。
[Abstract]:Background: the effectiveness of femoral nerve block in the perioperative analgesia of total knee arthroplasty is widely recognized, but the necessity of combined sciatic nerve block has been controversial. Objective: To explore the analgesic effect and functional exercise of femoral nerve block combined with sciatic nerve block in the perioperative multimode analgesia. Methods: 150 patients with total knee arthroplasty were randomly divided into 3 groups, 50 cases in each group. The general anesthesia group was performed general anesthesia before the operation; femoral nerve block group was performed the femoral nerve block before general anesthesia; femoral nerve + sciatic nerve block group was treated with the lateral femoral nerve and the sciatic deity block before general anesthesia. The 3 groups were resting after the operation, and the movement state was compared. Results and conclusions: (1) the femoral nerve block group, the femoral nerve and the sciatic nerve block group were resting at all time points after the operation, and the exercise visual analogue score was significantly lower than the general anesthesia group (P0.05), the femoral nerve + sciatic nerve block group was significant (1) Lower than the femoral nerve block group (P0.05); (2) the femoral nerve block group, the femoral nerve + sciatic nerve block group was significantly greater than the general anesthesia group (P0.05), femoral nerve + sciatic nerve block group was significantly greater than the femoral nerve block group (P0.05); (3) femoral nerve block group, femoral nerve + sciatic nerve block group after operation days after operation Significantly less than the general anesthesia group (P0.05), femoral nerve + sciatic nerve block group was significantly less than the femoral nerve block group (P0.05); (4) 1 months after the operation, the femoral nerve block group, the femoral nerve + sciatic nerve block group HSS score was significantly higher than the general anesthesia group (P0.05), femoral nerve + sciatic nerve block group was significantly higher than the femoral nerve block group (P0.05); after the operation, the group was significantly higher than the femoral nerve block group (P0.05). There was no significant difference in HSS score between the 3 groups at 3 months and 6 months (P0.05). (5) the results suggested that the femoral nerve combined with sciatic nerve block had better postoperative analgesic effect in the multimodal analgesia during total knee replacement, and provided the early functional exercise for the patients with total knee replacement. Favorable conditions.
【作者單位】： 安徽醫(yī)科大學第一附屬醫(yī)院關節(jié)與骨腫瘤外科;安徽醫(yī)科大學第一附屬醫(yī)院麻醉科;
【分類號】：R614

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 文碧元;乆窩上角徑路坐骨神經(jīng)阻滯50例報告[J];湖南醫(yī)學;1990年03期

2 張桂芬;鮑紅光;張少華;;坐骨神經(jīng)阻滯臨床應用232例總結(jié)[J];臨床麻醉學雜志;1991年02期

3 余丹;吳赤球;李景琦;高堅;陳為明;黃軻;;超聲引導下坐骨神經(jīng)阻滯的臨床研究[J];武警醫(yī)學院學報;2008年11期

4 陳永學;李金柱;李書河;亢風香;;坐骨神經(jīng)阻滯途徑的體會[J];中國誤診學雜志;2009年03期

5 黃承志;于偉佳;;下肢手術病人運用坐骨神經(jīng)阻滯的臨床觀察[J];中國民族民間醫(yī)藥;2009年04期

6 王愛忠;陳佳;江偉;;超聲引導連續(xù)坐骨神經(jīng)阻滯用于足部手術術后鎮(zhèn)痛[J];臨床麻醉學雜志;2009年09期

7 陳超;孫正令;;腰大肌肌溝阻滯聯(lián)合坐骨神經(jīng)阻滯在下肢手術應用[J];中國社區(qū)醫(yī)師(醫(yī)學專業(yè));2013年05期

8 楊振中;;坐骨神經(jīng)阻滯的簡易定位[J];廣東解剖學通報;1987年02期

9 修培宏;;小兒坐骨神經(jīng)阻滯[J];國外醫(yī)學.麻醉學與復蘇分冊;1991年02期

10 張慧君;萬培玲;王穎;;坐骨神經(jīng)阻滯對后足切割大鼠脊髓中腦源性神經(jīng)營養(yǎng)因子表達的影響[J];海南醫(yī)學;2012年13期

相關會議論文 前8條

1 盛曉生;;坐骨神經(jīng)阻滯后出現(xiàn)異常疼痛一例[A];2009年浙江省麻醉學學術會議論文匯編[C];2009年

2 余丹;吳赤球;李景琦;高堅;陳為明;黃軻;;超聲引導下坐骨神經(jīng)阻滯的臨床研究[A];2008年浙江省神經(jīng)病學學術年會論文匯編[C];2008年

3 耿樹軍;;連續(xù)坐骨神經(jīng)阻滯治療重癥下肢缺血患者靜息痛的初步體會[A];中華中醫(yī)藥學會周圍血管病分會學術大會論文集（一）[C];2009年

4 壽紅艷;劉樂;郭獻陽;徐旭仲;陳麗梅;;利多卡因復合羅哌卡因在坐骨神經(jīng)阻滯時的麻醉效果[A];2008年第七次華東六省一市麻醉學學術會議暨浙江省麻醉學術年會論文匯編（下冊）[C];2008年

5 程文華;楊飛;張素敏;;羅哌卡因用于老年病人坐骨神經(jīng)阻滯的藥代動力學研究[A];中華醫(yī)學會疼痛學分會第六屆年會論文摘要[C];2005年

6 耿樹軍;;連續(xù)坐骨神經(jīng)阻滯治療重癥下肢缺血患者靜息痛的初步體會[A];2009全國中西醫(yī)結(jié)合周圍血管疾病學術交流會論文集[C];2009年

7 陳素麗;郝潤中;徐瑞玲;李樹人;;用神經(jīng)刺激儀行腰叢與坐骨神經(jīng)阻滯治療腰椎間盤突出癥的臨床療效觀察[A];中華醫(yī)學會疼痛學分會第六屆年會論文摘要[C];2005年

8 陳麗梅;徐旭仲;劉樂;王權光;胡國新;;坐骨-腰叢神經(jīng)阻滯時利多卡因?qū)α_哌卡因藥代動力學的影響[A];2008年第七次華東六省一市麻醉學學術會議暨浙江省麻醉學術年會論文匯編（下冊）[C];2008年

相關博士學位論文 前2條

1 唐帥;坐骨神經(jīng)阻滯的恢復時間在糖尿病人與非糖尿病人中的差異[D];北京協(xié)和醫(yī)學院;2015年

2 董錫臣;大劑量羅哌卡因用于犬坐骨神經(jīng)阻滯的藥代動力學及耐受性研究[D];中國協(xié)和醫(yī)科大學;2006年

相關碩士學位論文 前9條

1 黎治滔;年齡和兩種不同麻醉方式對右美托咪定用于下肢手術鎮(zhèn)靜的影響[D];南方醫(yī)科大學;2015年

2 趙俊旭;全膝關節(jié)置換術（TKA）術后2種鎮(zhèn)痛方法療效比較[D];新疆醫(yī)科大學;2016年

3 汪麗娜;腰叢—坐骨神經(jīng)阻滯在老年人全膝關節(jié)置換的臨床應用[D];大連醫(yī)科大學;2013年

4 劉妍s，

本文編號：2157222