35例妊娠合并血小板減少癥患者剖宮產(chǎn)術(shù)中連續(xù)蛛網(wǎng)膜下腔麻醉觀察
本文選題:妊娠期血小板減少癥 + 連續(xù)蛛網(wǎng)膜下腔麻醉; 參考:《山東醫(yī)藥》2017年03期
【摘要】:目的觀察合并妊娠期血小板減少癥的產(chǎn)婦剖宮產(chǎn)術(shù)應用連續(xù)蛛網(wǎng)膜下腔麻醉的可行性。方法合并妊娠期血小板減少癥行剖宮產(chǎn)術(shù)分娩的產(chǎn)婦70例,采用隨機數(shù)字表法分為CSA組、GA組各35例。CSA組手術(shù)采用布比卡因連續(xù)蛛網(wǎng)膜下腔麻醉,待麻醉平面達到T6開始手術(shù);GA組手術(shù)采用丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼、羅庫溴銨誘導全身麻醉、氣管插管后機械通氣。記錄產(chǎn)婦術(shù)前血小板計數(shù)、術(shù)中出血量、從手術(shù)切皮至胎兒娩出時間(UIDI)。比較兩組產(chǎn)婦麻醉前和麻醉后5、10、20、30 min及手術(shù)結(jié)束時的平均動脈壓(MAP)和心率(HR)。比較兩組新生兒體質(zhì)量,出生后1、5、10 min Apgar評分,臍帶動脈血血氣分析結(jié)果。觀察產(chǎn)婦有無惡心嘔吐、頭痛、馬尾綜合征、術(shù)中知曉等情況。結(jié)果 CSA組UIDI短于GA組(P0.05)。CSA組麻醉后5 min的MAP低于GA組(P0.05)。兩組新生兒出生后1 min Apgar評分均大于5分,GA組6~8分者8例,CSA組為2例,兩組相比,P0.05;兩組新生兒出生后5、10 min Apgar評分均為9~10分,差異無統(tǒng)計學意義。CSA組發(fā)生惡心嘔吐4例、頭痛1例(術(shù)后第3天緩解),GA組分別為5、0例。兩組均未發(fā)生馬尾綜合征和術(shù)中知曉情況。結(jié)論連續(xù)蛛網(wǎng)膜下腔麻醉用于妊娠期血小板減少癥產(chǎn)婦行剖宮產(chǎn)術(shù)安全可行,對胎兒影響小,不良反應較少。
[Abstract]:Objective to observe the feasibility of continuous subarachnoid anesthesia in cesarean section of pregnant women with thrombocytopenia. Methods 70 pregnant women with thrombocytopenia complicating pregnancy undergoing cesarean section were randomly divided into CSA group (n = 35) and CSA group (n = 35). Continuous subarachnoid anesthesia with bupivacaine was used in CSA group. In GA group, propofol, remifentanil and rocuronium were used to induce general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation after tracheal intubation. The platelet count, intraoperative blood loss, and the time from skin incision to fetal delivery (UIDI) were recorded. The mean arterial pressure (map) and heart rate (HR) before and after anesthesia were compared between the two groups. The body weight of newborns, the score of 10 min Apgar and the blood gas analysis of umbilical artery were compared between the two groups. To observe the nausea and vomiting, headache, cauda equina syndrome, intraoperative knowledge and so on. Results the map of CSA group was shorter than GA group (P0.05). The map of CSA group 5 min after anesthesia was lower than that of GA group (P0.05). There were 2 cases in GA group with 6 ~ 8 scores in GA group, 2 cases in group A (P 0.05), 9 ~ 10 min Apgar scores in group A (9 ~ 10 min Apgar) after birth, and 4 cases of nausea and vomiting occurred in group A, the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two groups in the score of 1 min Apgar after birth (P < 0.05), the difference was not significant (P > 0.05). There were 5 cases of headache in GA group (3 days after operation). Cauda equina syndrome and intraoperative knowledge were not found in both groups. Conclusion continuous subarachnoid anesthesia is safe and feasible for pregnant women with thrombocytopenia.
【作者單位】: 首都醫(yī)科大學附屬北京婦產(chǎn)醫(yī)院;
【分類號】:R614.4
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 徐德成,曾小斌,徐小東;經(jīng)蛛網(wǎng)膜下腔麻醉下預先鎮(zhèn)痛的臨床觀察[J];海南醫(yī)學;2005年02期
2 李宇翔;葉玉萍;;連續(xù)蛛網(wǎng)膜下腔麻醉在婦科手術(shù)中的應用[J];中國老年學雜志;2008年14期
3 劉東明;;淺談蛛網(wǎng)膜下腔阻滯麻醉在臨床中的應用及意義[J];才智;2009年25期
4 馮雷;鄧麗娜;張桂榮;;蛛網(wǎng)膜下腔麻醉手術(shù)患者導尿時機的選擇[J];中國醫(yī)藥導報;2010年07期
5 張寧;韓斌;徐銘軍;;連續(xù)蛛網(wǎng)膜下腔麻醉與鎮(zhèn)痛臨床應用進展[J];醫(yī)學綜述;2010年15期
6 張寧;徐銘軍;;連續(xù)蛛網(wǎng)膜下腔麻醉臨床應用進展[J];臨床麻醉學雜志;2010年08期
7 李蘊鳳;;淺談蛛網(wǎng)膜下腔麻醉在婦產(chǎn)科臨床的應用效果[J];求醫(yī)問藥(下半月);2013年11期
8 張立偉;蛛網(wǎng)膜下腔麻醉與硬膜外腔麻醉的護理特點[J];中國局解手術(shù)學雜志;2000年02期
9 金宗英,金永芳,羅江勤;蛛網(wǎng)膜下腔麻醉前輸液對麻醉后血壓的影響[J];護士進修雜志;2004年09期
10 李東瀛;;產(chǎn)婦蛛網(wǎng)膜下腔麻醉術(shù)后頭痛的預防和治療[J];中國現(xiàn)代藥物應用;2009年12期
相關(guān)會議論文 前1條
1 周靜;;蛛網(wǎng)膜下腔麻醉過程中的護理配合體會[A];全國第十屆手術(shù)室護理學術(shù)交流暨專題講座會議論文匯編(下)[C];2006年
相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條
1 李江濤;利多卡因代謝物MEGX在蛛網(wǎng)膜下腔麻醉致死犬體內(nèi)的死后再分布研究[D];山西醫(yī)科大學;2012年
,本文編號:2116872
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/waikelunwen/2116872.html