本文選題：頸椎 + 骨折　； 參考：《中國(guó)矯形外科雜志》2017年08期

【摘要】：[目的]分析證明頸前路撐開(kāi)螺釘提拉復(fù)位技術(shù)較常規(guī)前路復(fù)位技術(shù)在治療外傷性頸椎骨折脫位的優(yōu)勢(shì)。[方法]收集2008年1月~2014年6月采用Ⅰ期前路治療牽張屈曲分離型雙側(cè)關(guān)節(jié)突交鎖的86例外傷性頸椎骨折脫位患者,男54例,女32例;年齡20~73歲,平均(40.1±5.6)歲。按照入院順序分配到頸前路常規(guī)復(fù)位(44例)和頸前路撐開(kāi)螺釘提拉復(fù)位(42例)。比較兩組間術(shù)中出血量、手術(shù)時(shí)間、術(shù)后椎體復(fù)位率,術(shù)后隨訪12~18個(gè)月,通過(guò)Frankel’s評(píng)分、JOA評(píng)分、VAS評(píng)分對(duì)其療效進(jìn)行評(píng)定。[結(jié)果]兩組手術(shù)時(shí)間及頸椎脫位矯正率的組間比較差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),提拉復(fù)位組優(yōu)于常規(guī)復(fù)位組。兩組術(shù)后Frankel’s評(píng)分、VAS評(píng)分、JOA評(píng)分均較術(shù)前明顯改善,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05);三項(xiàng)評(píng)分組間比較差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)。[結(jié)論]頸前路撐開(kāi)螺釘提拉復(fù)位技術(shù)操作簡(jiǎn)單、操作風(fēng)險(xiǎn)低、手術(shù)時(shí)間短,術(shù)中椎體復(fù)位效果及術(shù)后功能恢復(fù)良好,同時(shí)可減少常規(guī)復(fù)位法中因撬撥或復(fù)位中關(guān)節(jié)彈跳引起的頸髓醫(yī)源性損傷及術(shù)后并發(fā)癥,是一種安全有效的治療頸椎骨折脫位的手術(shù)方法,較常規(guī)手術(shù)復(fù)位組有明顯優(yōu)勢(shì),中長(zhǎng)期隨訪頸椎穩(wěn)定性良好,適合臨床推廣應(yīng)用。
[Abstract]:[objective] to prove the advantage of anterior cervical distraction screw lifting reduction technique in the treatment of traumatic cervical fracture and dislocation. [methods] from January 2008 to June 2014, 86 patients (54 males and 32 females) with traumatic cervical fracture and dislocation were treated with stage I anterior approach. The average age was 40.1 鹵5.6 years, aged 20 to 73 years. According to the order of admission, 44 cases were assigned to the anterior cervical approach (n = 44) and 42 cases to the anterior cervical open screw lifting reduction (n = 42). The amount of blood loss, the time of operation, the rate of reduction of vertebral body after operation were compared between the two groups. The curative effect was evaluated by Frankelos score and JOA score and VAS score after follow-up for 12 ~ 18 months. [results] the difference of operation time and cervical dislocation correction rate between the two groups was statistically significant (P 0.05), and the lifting reduction group was superior to the conventional reduction group. The scores of Frankelos and VAS and JOA in the two groups were significantly improved compared with those before operation, and the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05), but there was no significant difference among the three groups (P 0.05). [conclusion] the technique of lifting reduction of anterior cervical distraction screw is simple, low risk, short operation time, good reduction effect during operation and good recovery of function after operation. At the same time, it can reduce the iatrogenic injury and postoperative complications of cervical spinal cord caused by prying or joint bounce in conventional reduction. It is a safe and effective surgical method for the treatment of fracture and dislocation of cervical vertebra, and has obvious advantages over conventional surgical reduction group. The long-term follow-up of cervical vertebrae is stable and suitable for clinical application.
【作者單位】： 同濟(jì)大學(xué)附屬東方醫(yī)院脊柱外科;中國(guó)人民解放軍第303醫(yī)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家自然基金資助項(xiàng)目(編號(hào):81371994) 浦東新區(qū)衛(wèi)生系統(tǒng)重點(diǎn)學(xué)科建設(shè)資助項(xiàng)目(編號(hào):PWZx2014-02)
【分類號(hào)】：R687.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 張治國(guó);張海兵;胡優(yōu)威;譚益云;朱欣;;外傷性頸椎骨折脫位的頸椎椎弓根螺釘內(nèi)固定治療及其臨床療效分析[J];現(xiàn)代生物醫(yī)學(xué)進(jìn)展;2013年33期

2 李榮祝,白崇恩,沈毓書(shū),韋紹仁;外傷性頸椎骨折、脫位合并高位截癱保守治療40例臨床分析[J];醫(yī)學(xué)文選;1995年02期

3 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號(hào)：2034160