本文關(guān)鍵詞： 腰椎1 微創(chuàng)2 椎管減壓術(shù)3　出處：《山西醫(yī)科大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：目的:探討經(jīng)通道下單側(cè)入路雙側(cè)減壓、椎間融合、經(jīng)皮椎弓根釘內(nèi)固定術(shù)相較于傳統(tǒng)腰椎后路雙側(cè)經(jīng)椎間孔椎間融合、椎弓根釘內(nèi)固定術(shù)治療單節(jié)段退行性腰椎雙側(cè)側(cè)隱窩狹窄癥合并椎間不穩(wěn)的優(yōu)勢(shì)。方法:回顧性分析2014年9月至2016年9月在山西大醫(yī)院骨科行手術(shù)治療的75名單節(jié)段退行性腰椎雙側(cè)側(cè)隱窩狹窄癥合并有腰椎不穩(wěn)的患者,其中微創(chuàng)組患者35名,采用經(jīng)通道單側(cè)入路雙側(cè)減壓、椎間融合、經(jīng)皮椎弓根釘內(nèi)固定術(shù);開(kāi)放組患者40名,采用傳統(tǒng)腰椎后路雙側(cè)經(jīng)椎間孔椎間融合、椎弓根釘內(nèi)固定術(shù)。分別記錄75名患者術(shù)中出血量、術(shù)后住院時(shí)間及手術(shù)時(shí)間;記錄70名患者手術(shù)前及手術(shù)后1周、3個(gè)月、6個(gè)月腰痛視覺(jué)模擬評(píng)分(VAS),術(shù)前及術(shù)后3個(gè)月、6個(gè)月日本骨科協(xié)會(huì)評(píng)分(JOA)和Oswestry功能障礙指數(shù)(ODI),兩組患者對(duì)比評(píng)價(jià)手術(shù)效果。結(jié)果:所有患者采取微信平臺(tái)、電話(huà)等方式均獲得6個(gè)月隨訪(fǎng)。微創(chuàng)組患者手術(shù)時(shí)間為(134.3±8.7)ml,開(kāi)放組患者手術(shù)時(shí)間為(134.9±8.9)ml,兩組對(duì)比差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05);微創(chuàng)組術(shù)中出血量為(108.7±13.6)ml,開(kāi)放組術(shù)中出血量為(336.3±30.0)ml,兩組對(duì)比差異具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05);術(shù)后住院時(shí)間微創(chuàng)組和開(kāi)放組分別為(7.8±1.0)天、(14.1±1.3)天,兩組對(duì)比差異具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)。手術(shù)前兩組患者腰椎JOA評(píng)分、腰痛VAS評(píng)分和ODI指數(shù)差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),組內(nèi)比較兩組患者術(shù)后各時(shí)間段腰椎JOA評(píng)分與術(shù)前相比具有明顯提高(P0.05),術(shù)后各時(shí)間段腰痛VAS評(píng)分與術(shù)前相比具有明顯降低(P0.05);術(shù)后第1周及第3個(gè)月微創(chuàng)組患者腰痛VAS評(píng)分均優(yōu)于開(kāi)放組(P0.05),術(shù)后第6個(gè)月末次隨訪(fǎng)兩組腰痛VAS評(píng)分相比差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05);術(shù)后第3個(gè)月微創(chuàng)組腰椎JOA評(píng)分和ODI評(píng)分高于開(kāi)放組(P0.05),術(shù)后第6個(gè)月末次隨訪(fǎng)微創(chuàng)組腰椎JOA評(píng)分和ODI評(píng)分與開(kāi)放組相比差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)。結(jié)論:微創(chuàng)通道下單側(cè)入路雙側(cè)減壓、椎間融合、經(jīng)皮椎弓根釘內(nèi)固定術(shù)在治療退行性雙側(cè)腰椎管側(cè)隱窩狹窄癥合并椎間不穩(wěn)上可以獲得與傳統(tǒng)腰椎后路雙側(cè)經(jīng)椎間孔椎間融合、椎弓根釘內(nèi)固定術(shù)相同的近期手術(shù)療效,且手術(shù)創(chuàng)傷小,住院時(shí)間短,特別是促進(jìn)患者早期康復(fù)方面具有明顯優(yōu)勢(shì)。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the bilateral decompression, intervertebral fusion and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation through the unilateral approach under the passage, compared with the traditional posterior lumbar intervertebral fusion. The advantages of pedicle screw internal fixation in the treatment of unilateral degenerative bilateral lumbar recess stenosis with intervertebral instability were analyzed retrospectively from September 2014 to September 2016 in the orthopedic department of Shanxi Provincial Hospital. Patients with bilateral recess stenosis associated with lumbar vertebrae instability, In the minimally invasive group, 35 patients were treated with bilateral decompression, intervertebral fusion and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation, while 40 patients in the open group were treated with traditional posterior lumbar intervertebral fusion. Intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay and operative time were recorded in 75 patients. Visual analogue scores of low back pain were recorded in 70 patients before operation and 1 week, 3 months and 6 months after surgery. The preoperative and postoperative scores of Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOAA) and the Oswestry dysfunction index were compared between the two groups. Results: all patients took the WeChat platform, The operation time was 134.3 鹵8.7 ml in the minimally invasive group and 134.9 鹵8.9 ml in the open group. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P 0.05), the intraoperative bleeding in the minimally invasive group was 108.7 鹵13.6 ml, and the intraoperative bleeding volume in the open group was 336.3 鹵30.0ml. The postoperative hospital stay in the minimally invasive group and the open group were 7.8 鹵1.0 days and 14.1 鹵1.3 days, respectively. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P 0.05). The JOA score of lumbar vertebrae in the two groups before operation was significantly higher than that in the control group. There was no significant difference in VAS score and ODI index of low back pain (P 0.05). The JOA score of lumbar vertebrae in the two groups was significantly higher than that before operation, and the VAS score of low back pain was significantly lower than that before operation. The VAS score of low back pain in the first week and the third month in the minimally invasive group was better than that in the open group. There was no significant difference in the VAS score of lumbar pain between the two groups at the sixth month after operation, and the JOA score of the lumbar vertebrae in the minimally invasive group at the third month after operation was higher than that in the open group. The scores and ODI scores of lumbar spine were higher in the open group than in the open group (P 0.05). There was no significant difference in the JOA score and ODI score of lumbar vertebrae between the minimally invasive group and the open group at the 6th month after operation. Conclusion: bilateral decompression via unilateral approach under minimally invasive channels is not significantly different from that in the open group. Intervertebral fusion and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation can be used to treat bilateral lumbar spinal canal stenosis with intervertebral instability. The internal fixation of pedicle screw had the same short-term curative effect, and the surgical trauma was small and the hospital stay was short, especially in promoting the early recovery of the patients.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：R687.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張健;郭海龍;李龍;盛偉斌;牙克甫·阿不力孜;;一期后路正中切口經(jīng)肌間隙入路治療腰椎感染性疾病[J];中華骨科雜志;2016年11期

2 龐正寶;龐幫鐳;湯優(yōu)民;劉軍輝;趙鳳東;范順武;;Wiltse入路治療單節(jié)段胸腰椎骨折對(duì)多裂肌影響的研究[J];中華骨科雜志;2016年02期

3 王根林;張福占;謝計(jì)樂(lè);張彬;陳潔;汪恒;姜為民;楊惠林;;Wiltse肌間隙入路聯(lián)合傷椎置釘治療胸腰段骨折[J];中華創(chuàng)傷骨科雜志;2015年12期

4 馬賽;張貴林;行勇剛;李楠;田偉;;可移動(dòng)單一小切口下雙側(cè)Wiltse微創(chuàng)入路治療胸腰椎骨折[J];中華創(chuàng)傷骨科雜志;2015年09期

5 羅志平;饒海群;黃大江;李國(guó)勇;柳超;董雙海;田紀(jì)偉;;通道輔助下微創(chuàng)經(jīng)椎間孔椎體間融合術(shù)治療腰椎退行性疾病的療效觀(guān)察[J];中華醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2015年33期

6 吳茂成;李康杰;南軍;金明;韓世煥;元虎;;計(jì)算機(jī)導(dǎo)航輔助下經(jīng)wiltse入路在老年胸腰椎骨折治療中的應(yīng)用[J];中國(guó)老年學(xué)雜志;2015年16期

7 錢(qián)宇;何磊;徐國(guó)健;趙鳳東;謝明華;王磊;朱國(guó)慶;;胸腰段最長(zhǎng)肌表面滋養(yǎng)血管的解剖學(xué)特征及其術(shù)中保護(hù)[J];中華骨科雜志;2015年06期

8 盛銀雅;陳莉娟;王立新;;脊柱及肋骨變異并存的法醫(yī)學(xué)鑒定2例[J];法醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2014年05期

9 桂柯科;俞永林;趙明東;譚德炎;尹望平;;中國(guó)人Wiltse椎旁肌間隙入路的觀(guān)察與測(cè)量[J];中國(guó)組織工程研究;2014年22期

10 崔旭;馬遠(yuǎn)征;陳興;薛海濱;胡明;羅小波;孟傳龍;;經(jīng)椎旁肌間隙后外側(cè)腰椎間孔入路手術(shù)治療腰椎結(jié)核和布氏桿菌病性脊柱炎[J];中華外科雜志;2014年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1530598