大鼠股骨開放截骨模型與閉合骨折模型比較的實驗研究
發(fā)布時間:2018-04-10 20:43
本文選題:大鼠 + 骨折 ; 參考:《蘇州大學》2008年碩士論文
【摘要】: 用于長骨干骨折愈合研究的動物模型通常有兩種:開放截骨模型與閉合骨折模型。開放截骨模型具有骨折面平整,骨折線可以任意控制,骨折模型重復性好等優(yōu)點,但目前有較多報道開放截骨模型骨折端接觸面積小,骨折不穩(wěn)定,容易移位,手術過程中對周圍組織損傷較大,并且會對骨組織產(chǎn)生熱損傷,因此對骨折愈合的影響因素增加。閉合性骨折模型局部軟組織損傷小,骨折斷端犬牙交錯,骨折穩(wěn)定不易再移位,外來干擾因素少,可較真實反應骨折愈合過程。目前國際上對近中期骨折愈合研究的模型一般采用閉合骨折模型,而國內(nèi)仍較多應用開放截骨模型。為此我們對兩種模型進行比較,從而為今后骨折愈合基礎研究的模型選擇提供參考。 目的:通過比較大鼠股骨開放截骨模型與閉合骨折模型的制作及其骨折的愈合過程,對比兩種模型的優(yōu)缺點,為今后骨折愈合基礎研究的模型選擇提供參考 方法: 1兩種模型制作的比較:40只雄性SD大鼠隨機分為開放組與閉合組。開放組行開放截骨術造成股骨中段橫行骨折,逆行克氏針固定;閉合組行逆行克氏針固后,使用造模支架致股骨中段閉合骨折。比較兩組的平均造模時間,造模成功率及術后2,3,4,8周骨折愈合的X線情況。 2兩種模型骨折愈合的比較: 80只雄性SD大鼠隨機分為開放組與閉合組。手術方法同上。并于術后30min、1、2、3、4、8周對兩組標本分別攝X線片和HE染色,進行觀察及比較。于術后2、3、4、8周對兩組標本進行四點彎曲試驗比較兩組模型的力學性質(zhì)。 結(jié)果: 1開放截骨模型每只平均造模時間為17分鐘,造模成功率90%,骨折畸形愈合及不愈合率40%;閉合骨折模型每只平均造模時間12分鐘,造模成功率85%,未見畸形愈合及不愈合 2術后2,3,4周X線評分開放組均低于閉合組(p0.05),8周時開放組X線評分仍較閉合組低,但無統(tǒng)計學差異(p0.05)。 3 HE染色顯示術后30 min開放組截骨面平整,閉合組骨折面呈犬牙交錯;1周、2周時開放組骨性骨痂不明顯,閉合組已經(jīng)可見明顯的骨性骨痂;3周時兩組骨性骨痂均增多,但開放組骨性骨痂較閉合組小;4周時開放組骨性骨痂仍較大,閉合組骨痂開始縮小;8周時兩組標本均骨性愈合,但開放組髓腔尚未再通,閉合組髓腔已完全再通。 4四點彎曲試驗后所有標本均斷裂。各時間點力學參數(shù)持續(xù)增高,2,3,4周各時間點開放組參數(shù)均低于閉合組,統(tǒng)計學差異顯著(p0.05)。8周時兩組標本的力學參數(shù)差異無統(tǒng)計學意義(p0.015)。 結(jié)論: 1開放截骨模型造模時間長,骨折畸形愈合及不愈合發(fā)生率高。 2開放截骨模型影響骨折愈合的夾雜因素較多,近中期骨折愈合明顯滯后 3開放截骨模型由于骨折愈合滯后,愈合早期生物力學指標變化趨勢不明顯,不適合用于近中期骨折愈合的基礎研究
[Abstract]:There are usually two animal models for long bone fracture healing: open osteotomy and closed fracture.The open osteotomy model has the advantages of flat fracture surface, arbitrary control of fracture line and good repeatability of fracture model. However, there are more reports that the contact area of fracture end of open osteotomy model is small, the fracture is unstable and easy to shift.The injury to the surrounding tissues and the thermal injury to the bone tissue during the operation process are very important, so the influencing factors of fracture healing are increased.The closed fracture model has less soft tissue injury, interlaced fracture ends, stable fracture and less external interference factors, which can reflect the healing process of fracture.At present, the closed fracture model is generally used in the international research on fracture healing in the near and middle period, but open osteotomy model is still widely used in our country.Therefore, we compare the two models to provide a reference for the selection of models for future basic research on fracture healing.Objective: to compare the models of open osteotomy and closed fracture of femur and the healing process of fracture in rats, and compare the advantages and disadvantages of the two models, so as to provide reference for the selection of models for basic research of fracture healing in the future.Methods:1 comparison of the two models: 40 male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into open group and closed group.Open osteotomy resulted in transverse fracture of the middle femur and retrograde Kirschner pin fixation in the open group, and closed fracture in the middle femur with model stent after retrograde Kirschner needle fixation in the closed group.The average modeling time, the success rate and the X ray of fracture healing were compared between the two groups.2 comparison of fracture healing in two models: 80 male SD rats were randomly divided into open group and closed group.The surgical procedure is the same as above.X-ray films and HE staining were taken at 30 minutes after operation and observed and compared between the two groups.The mechanical properties of the two groups were compared by four point bending test at 2: 3 and 4 ~ 4 weeks postoperatively.Results:1 the average time of open osteotomy was 17 minutes, the successful rate of modeling was 90, the rate of fracture malunion and nonunion was 40, the average time of each model was 12 minutes, the success rate of modeling was 85, and there was no malunion and nonunion2the X-ray score of the open group was lower than that of the closed group at 8 weeks after operation, but there was no statistical difference between the open group and the closed group.3HE staining showed that the osteotomy surface of the open group was flat at 30 min after operation, the fracture surface of the closed group was not obvious at 1 week and 2 weeks after operation, and the osseous callus of the closed group was obviously increased after 3 weeks.However, the bone callus of the open group was still larger than that of the closed group at 4 weeks. The callus of the closed group began to shrink and the bone healed in both groups at 8 weeks, but the medullary cavity in the open group was not re-opened, and the medullary cavity in the closed group was completely recanalized.4 all specimens were fractured after four point bending test.The mechanical parameters of the open group were significantly lower than that of the closed group at 4 weeks after 4 weeks. There was no significant difference in the mechanical parameters between the two groups at the week of p 0.05.8. There was no significant difference in the mechanical parameters between the two groups (p 0.015).Conclusion:1 the open osteotomy model was made for a long time, and the rate of fracture malunion and nonunion was high.(2) the open osteotomy model has many factors affecting fracture healing, but the fracture healing is obviously delayed in the near and middle period.3Open osteotomy model has no obvious change trend of biomechanical indexes in early healing due to the lag of fracture healing, so it is not suitable for basic research of fracture healing in the near and middle period.
【學位授予單位】:蘇州大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2008
【分類號】:R683;R-332
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前6條
1 劉毓順,,周金水,林葆凱,蔡崇旺;接骨散對家兔骨折的實驗研究[J];福建中醫(yī)藥;1994年03期
2 周曉中;董啟榕;張健;;大鼠股骨閉合骨折模型的制作[J];東南大學學報(醫(yī)學版);2007年01期
3 費琴明,陳統(tǒng)一,陳中偉;大鼠脛骨標準骨折模型的制作[J];上海實驗動物科學;2002年01期
4 梁春雨;張柳;趙文國;程愛國;;前交叉韌帶切斷對卵巢切除大鼠股骨骨折愈合的影響[J];中國骨質(zhì)疏松雜志;2005年02期
5 徐少文,喻任,趙光鋒,王建衛(wèi);去勢對骨折早期愈合過程的影響[J];中華骨科雜志;2003年07期
6 曾忠華,余黎,肖璇,曾俊;血管內(nèi)皮生長因子在骨折修復過程中血管生成的促進作用[J];中華實驗外科雜志;2005年06期
本文編號:1732837
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/shiyanyixue/1732837.html
最近更新
教材專著