【摘要】：目的比較超聲引導(dǎo)下~(32)P磷酸鉻膠體(簡(jiǎn)稱(chēng)~(32)P)膠體、無(wú)水酒精及單純抽液介入治療甲狀腺囊性結(jié)節(jié)的臨床效果,探討最佳介入治療方法。方法將189例甲狀腺囊性結(jié)節(jié)患者隨機(jī)分為~(32)P膠體組71例、無(wú)水酒精組65例、單純抽液組53例。三組均于超聲引導(dǎo)下抽盡囊液,~(32)P膠體組注入~(32)P膠體1.85~3.70 MBq/cm3與地塞米松1~5 mg的混合液;無(wú)水酒精組按抽液量的1/3注入無(wú)水酒精;單純抽液組不注入藥物。比較三組的臨床療效、不良反應(yīng)發(fā)生率及二次治療率。結(jié)果~(32)P膠體組、無(wú)水酒精組、單純抽液組首次治療有效率分別為87.32%(62/71)、70.77%(46/65)、22.64%(12/53)。~(32)P膠體組首次治療有效率高于無(wú)水酒精組和單純抽液組(P0.05或0.01),且無(wú)水酒精組高于單純抽液組(P0.01)。~(32)P膠體組、無(wú)水酒精組、單純抽液組不良反應(yīng)發(fā)生率分別為4.2%(3/71)、10.8%(7/65)、3.8%(2/53)。三組不良反應(yīng)發(fā)生率比較,P均0.05。~(32)P膠體組、無(wú)水酒精組、單純抽液組分別有29例(40.8%)、46例(70.8%)、51例(96.2%),需進(jìn)行二次治療,其二次治療率依次升高(P均0.01)。結(jié)論超聲引導(dǎo)下~(32)P膠體介入治療甲狀腺囊性結(jié)節(jié)臨床效果較好、安全性較高。
[Abstract]:Objective to compare the clinical effects of ultrasound guided ~ (32) P chromic phosphate colloid (32) P) colloid), anhydrous alcohol and simple extraction in the treatment of thyroid cystic nodules, and to explore the best interventional therapy. Methods 189 patients with thyroid cystic nodules were randomly divided into ~ (32) P colloid group (n = 71), anhydrous alcohol group (n = 65) and simple extraction group (n = 53). All the three groups were injected with ~ (32) P colloidal solution (1.85 ~ 3.70 MBq/cm3) and dexamethasone (1 ~ 5 mg) under the guidance of ultrasound, the anhydrous alcohol group was injected with anhydrous alcohol according to 1 / 3 of the extracted volume, and the pure extract group was not injected with drugs. The clinical efficacy, adverse reaction rate and secondary treatment rate were compared among the three groups. Results the effective rates of the first treatment were 87.32% (62 / 71), 70.77% (46 / 65), 22.64% (12 / 53) .32 P colloidal group were higher than those in the anhydrous alcohol group and the pure extraction group (P0.05 or 0.01), and the effective rate of the absolute alcohol group was higher than that of the pure extract group (P0.01) .32 P colloid group. In anhydrous alcohol group, the incidence of adverse reactions was 4.2% (3 / 71) or 10.8% (7 / 65) or 3.8% (2 / 53) respectively. There were 29 cases (40.8%) and 46 cases (70.8%) with 51 cases (96.2%) in the three groups, respectively. The rate of secondary treatment was higher than that of the control group (P 0.01), and the incidence of adverse reactions was 0.05.32 P colloidal group, anhydrous alcohol group and pure liquid extraction group respectively (29 cases, 40.8%, 70.8%, 96.2%), and the rate of secondary treatment was higher than that of the control group (P 0.01). Conclusion Ultrasound-guided ~ (32) P colloid interventional therapy for thyroid cystic nodules is effective and safe.
【作者單位】： 河北工程大學(xué)附屬醫(yī)院;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：R581

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 蘇艷;;~(32)P內(nèi)放射治療甲狀腺囊腫22例效果分析[J];中國(guó)誤診學(xué)雜志;2008年01期

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 蔣延國(guó);理氣消癭丸治療甲狀腺囊腫的臨床研究[D];黑龍江中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2013年

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 杜云華;秦有道;劉文宗;;103例甲狀腺囊性結(jié)節(jié)臨床分析[J];中原醫(yī)刊;1990年01期

2 J.Y.Sung;J.H.Baek;K.S.Kim;D.Lee;H.Yoo;J.K.Kim;趙博;;分別應(yīng)用乙醇消融和射頻消融術(shù)對(duì)良性甲狀腺囊性結(jié)節(jié)進(jìn)行單次治療后效果的比較:前瞻性隨機(jī)研究[J];國(guó)際醫(yī)學(xué)放射學(xué)雜志;2013年06期

3 劉升;;高頻超聲引導(dǎo)穿刺硬化治療甲狀腺囊性結(jié)節(jié)32例分析[J];青海醫(yī)藥雜志;2006年08期

4 胡景銘;穿刺注藥法治療良性甲狀腺囊性結(jié)節(jié)的臨床觀察[J];湖南醫(yī)學(xué);1999年03期

5 王慶文;李向沛;黨磊;黎奇;馬春芝;劉曉玲;;超聲引導(dǎo)經(jīng)皮注射無(wú)水乙醇介入治療甲狀腺囊性結(jié)節(jié)的臨床應(yīng)用[J];天津醫(yī)藥;2008年10期

6 戴繼宏;張明巍;張碩;顧雪橋;才宇;;無(wú)水酒精硬化治療63例甲狀腺囊性結(jié)節(jié)的療效分析[J];醫(yī)學(xué)影像學(xué)雜志;2006年11期

7 段素梅;楊寶良;秦樹(shù)光;張學(xué)東;;~(32)P膠體囊內(nèi)注射輔以L(fǎng)-T_4治療甲狀腺囊性結(jié)節(jié)98例分析[J];中國(guó)誤診學(xué)雜志;2009年07期

8 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號(hào)：2256200