本文選題：2型糖尿病 + 糖尿病血管并發(fā)癥�。� 參考：《河北醫(yī)科大學》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：目的:內(nèi)皮祖細胞(EPCs)是血管內(nèi)皮修復的重要物質(zhì),EPCs數(shù)量和功能的下降是2型糖尿病并發(fā)癥的主要原因之一,本研究旨在探討α-硫辛酸(ALA)對糖尿病周圍神經(jīng)病變患者循環(huán)EPCs數(shù)量的影響,并探討其機制,為糖尿病慢性并發(fā)癥的預防及治療提供依據(jù)。方法:1選擇2014年8月至2015年1月收入院的50例2型糖尿病合并糖尿病周圍神經(jīng)病變患者,其中男性31例,女性19例,均符合2009年中國糖尿病周圍神經(jīng)病變診療規(guī)范提出的糖尿病周圍神經(jīng)病變的診斷標準,詳細記錄患者性別、年齡、病程、身高及體重�；颊呓堤撬幬锞鶠橐葝u素,口服他汀類藥物保護血管內(nèi)皮治療,待患者空腹血糖7.0mmol/L、餐后2h血糖10.0mmol/L,血壓控制在140/80mm Hg左右,將入選對象隨機分為兩組:1)對照組(Control Group):應用丹參酮IIA磺酸鈉、甲鈷胺、前列地爾組(Con,n=20);2)硫辛酸組(ALA Group):在對照組基礎上聯(lián)合α-硫辛酸(ALA,n=30),治療時間均為2周。觀察治療前后兩組患者EPCs數(shù)量及氧化應激指標的變化,并探討他們之間的關系。2采用流式細胞儀檢測EPCs(CD34+/VEGFR2+)數(shù)量;3采用酶法測甘油三酯(TG)、總膽固醇(T-CHO)、低密度脂蛋白膽固醇(LDL-C)、高密度脂蛋白膽固醇(HDL-C),測定超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、谷胱甘肽過氧化物酶(GSH-PX)的活性,采用硫代巴比妥酸法測定丙二醛(MDA),采用ELISA酶聯(lián)免疫吸附試驗法檢測8-羥基脫氧鳥苷(8-OHd G)的變化情況。4所有數(shù)據(jù)處理均應用SPSS17.0軟件分析,計量資料采用t檢驗及非參數(shù)檢驗,相關分析采用多元線性回歸分析。結(jié)果:1兩組治療前比較兩組間年齡(Age)、性別(Sex)、糖尿病病程、收縮壓(SBP)、舒張壓(DBP)、體重指數(shù)(BMI)、空腹血糖(FBG)、糖化血紅蛋白(Hb A1c)、TG、T-CHO、LDL-C、HDL-C、EPCs數(shù)量、SOD、GSH-PX、MDA、8-OHd G相比無差異(P0.05)。2對照組(Con)EPCs數(shù)量治療前后相比無差異(P0.05);SOD、GSH-PX、MDA、8-OHd G治療前后相比無差異(P0.05);TG、T-CHO、LDL-C治療后較治療前明顯下降,HDL-C治療后較治療前顯著升高,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05)。3硫辛酸組(ALA)EPCs數(shù)量治療后較治療前明顯增加,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05);SOD、GSH-PX治療后較治療前活性明顯增加,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05);MDA、8-OHd G水平治療后較治療前含量明顯減低,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05);TG、T-CHO、LDL-C治療后較治療前明顯下降,HDL-C治療后較治療前明顯升高,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05)。4兩組治療后比較治療后EPCs數(shù)量硫辛酸組較對照組明顯增加,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05);SOD、GSH-PX硫辛酸組較對照組活力明顯增加,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05);MDA、8-OHd G水平硫辛酸組較對照組含量明顯減低,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05);TG、T-CHO、LDL-C、HDL-C兩組相比無差異(P0.05)。5兩組治療前后相關指標差值的比較兩組EPCs數(shù)量治療前后差值相比,硫辛酸組較對照組明顯增加,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05);SOD、GSH-PX硫辛酸組較對照組活性明顯增加,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05);MDA、8-OHd G水平硫辛酸組較對照組含量明顯減低,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05);TG、T-CHO、LDL-C、HDL-C相比無差異(P0.05)。6 EPCs數(shù)量與相關參數(shù)的相關性以硫辛酸組EPCs治療前后數(shù)量的差值作為因變量,硫辛酸組SOD、GSH-PX、MDA、8-OHd G、TG、T-CHO、LDL-C、HDL-C、FBG治療前后的差值作為自變量進行多元線性回歸分析,經(jīng)逐步擬合,最優(yōu)回歸方程為:Y=6.349+0.195X2-3.335X3,X2代表GSH-PX的差值(P=0.01),X3代表MDA的差值(P=0.041),內(nèi)皮祖細胞數(shù)目與GSH-PX、MDA有相關性。結(jié)論:1糖尿病周圍神經(jīng)病變患者經(jīng)ALA治療后,EPCs數(shù)量明顯增加;2 ALA可以改善糖尿病周圍神經(jīng)病變患者氧化應激水平,恢復抗氧化酶SOD、GSH-PX活性,減低MDA、8-OHd G的含量;3 ALA增加EPCs的數(shù)量與氧化應激相關。
[Abstract]:Objective: endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) is an important substance in vascular endothelial repair. The decrease of EPCs number and function is one of the main causes of complications of type 2 diabetes. This study aims to explore the effect of alpha lipoic acid (ALA) on the number of circulatory EPCs in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy, and to explore its mechanism for the prevention and prevention of chronic diabetic complications. Methods: 1 to select 50 patients with type 2 diabetes with diabetic peripheral neuropathy from August 2014 to January 2015, including 31 male and 19 female, which were all in line with the diagnostic criteria of the diabetic peripheral neuropathy around the diabetic peripheral neuropathy in 2009, and the patient's sex was recorded in detail. Age, course of disease, height and weight. The patients with hypoglycemic drugs were insulin, oral administration of statins to protect vascular endothelium, pending fasting blood glucose 7.0mmol/L, postprandial 2H blood glucose 10.0mmol/L, blood pressure control at 140/80mm Hg, and randomly divided into two groups: 1) group (Control Group): the application of tanshinone IIA sulfonic acid sodium, Mecobalamin, pre Mecobalamin, The group (Con, n=20); 2) sulfur octanic acid group (ALA Group): Based on the control group, combined with alpha lipoic acid (ALA, n=30), the treatment time was 2 weeks. The changes in the number of EPCs and oxidative stress in two groups of patients were observed before and after treatment, and the relationship between them and the number of EPCs (CD34+/VEGFR2+) detected by the flow cytometry was explored; 3 by enzyme method. Oil three ester (TG), total cholesterol (T-CHO), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-PX), the determination of malonaldehyde (MDA) by thiobarbituric acid method, and the determination of 8- hydroxy deoxy guanosine (8-OH) by the enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (8-OH). The changes in D G) all data processing in.4 were analyzed by SPSS17.0 software. The measurement data were examined by t test and nonparametric test, and multivariate linear regression analysis was used. Results 1 groups of two groups were compared with two groups of age (Age), sex (Sex), diabetes course, systolic pressure (SBP), diastolic pressure (DBP), body mass index (BMI), and fasting blood glucose (FBG). Glycosylated hemoglobin (Hb A1c), TG, T-CHO, LDL-C, HDL-C, EPCs quantity, SOD, GSH-PX, MDA, 8-OHd G before and after treatment. The difference has statistical significance (P0.05).3 sulphate octanic acid group (ALA) EPCs number after treatment significantly increased compared with before treatment, the difference was statistically significant (P0.05); SOD, GSH-PX after treatment significantly increased before treatment, the difference was statistically significant (P0.05); MDA, 8-OHd G level after treatment was significantly lower than before treatment, the difference was statistically significant. (P0.05); TG, T-CHO, LDL-C after treatment was significantly lower than before treatment, HDL-C treatment was significantly higher than before treatment, the difference was statistically significant (P0.05).4 two group after treatment, the number of EPCs in the group of lipoic acid was significantly increased compared with the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P0.05); SOD, GSH-PX sulphate octanic acid group than the control group activity significantly increased, the difference was Statistical significance (P0.05); MDA, 8-OHd G level of lipoic acid group was significantly lower than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P0.05); TG, T-CHO, LDL-C, HDL-C two groups compared with the difference (P0.05).5 two groups before and after treatment of the difference between the two groups before and after the difference between the number of EPCs, the group of sulphur octanic acid was significantly higher than the control group, the difference was Statistical significance (P0.05); SOD, GSH-PX lipoic acid group activity significantly increased compared with the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P0.05); MDA, 8-OHd G level of sulphur octanoic acid group content was significantly lower than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P0.05); TG, T-CHO, LDL-C, HDL-C phase and relative parameters of the correlation with the related parameters of sulphur octanoic acid group The difference value of the number of Cs before and after treatment was used as the dependent variable. The difference values of SOD, GSH-PX, MDA, 8-OHd G, TG, T-CHO, LDL-C, HDL-C, and FBG were used as multivariate linear regression analysis before and after the treatment. The number of progenitor cells was associated with GSH-PX and MDA. Conclusion: 1 patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy were treated with ALA, and the number of EPCs increased significantly. 2 ALA could improve the level of oxidative stress in diabetic peripheral neuropathy, restore antioxidant enzyme SOD, GSH-PX activity, reduce the content of MDA, 8-OHd G; 3 ALA increase the number of EPCs and oxidative stress. Close.
【學位授予單位】：河北醫(yī)科大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：R587.2

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 閔運兵;王丹;黃燕萍;;α-硫辛酸治療糖尿病足17例療效觀察[J];廣東醫(yī)學;2009年01期

2 許娟;高云;岳峰;;α-硫辛酸對糖尿病視網(wǎng)膜病變患者血管內(nèi)皮生長因子的影響[J];泰山醫(yī)學院學報;2012年04期

3 黃濤,黃開勛;α-硫辛酸的生物醫(yī)學功能[J];生命的化學;2004年01期

4 劉紅林 ,牛勃 ,常冰梅 ,程牛亮 ,許言午 ,趙建濱;α-硫辛酸與維生素C和維生素E的抗氧化作用比較[J];中國藥物與臨床;2005年01期

5 劉赫;;α-硫辛酸的臨床應用[J];實用糖尿病雜志;2007年01期

6 張鴻;董風其;;α-硫辛酸治療糖尿病性周圍神經(jīng)病變的療效觀察[J];中國實用神經(jīng)疾病雜志;2007年07期

7 楊慶平;王翼華;鐘國慶;;α-硫辛酸注射液治療糖尿病性周圍神經(jīng)病變療效觀察[J];中國社區(qū)醫(yī)師(醫(yī)學專業(yè)半月刊);2008年22期

8 李安林;;α-硫辛酸的研究進展[J];食品科技;2008年04期

9 王翼華;丁燕萍;楊慶平;;α-硫辛酸對2型糖尿病微血管病變保護作用探討[J];中國誤診學雜志;2009年15期

10 曹萌;王濤;陳雪輝;;α-硫辛酸、溴吡斯的明聯(lián)合治療糖尿病神經(jīng)源性膀胱療效觀察[J];中國醫(yī)藥導報;2011年15期

相關會議論文 前10條

1 葉文銳;仲偉鑒;肖萍;帥怡;;α-硫辛酸的延緩衰老作用研究進展[A];第四屆第二次中國毒理學會食品毒理學專業(yè)委員會與營養(yǎng)食品所毒理室聯(lián)合召開學術會議論文集[C];2008年

2 陳新愛;;α-硫辛酸的生物合成研究進展[A];中國細胞生物學學會2005年學術大會、青年學術研討會論文摘要集[C];2005年

3 孟馨;李志明;周一軍;曹艷麗;張錦;;α-硫辛酸對高糖誘導人臍靜脈內(nèi)皮細胞凋亡的作用機制研究[A];2008內(nèi)分泌代謝性疾病系列研討會暨中青年英文論壇論文匯編[C];2008年

4 馬愛勤;;α-硫辛酸的功能與臨床應用[A];山東營養(yǎng)學會營養(yǎng)產(chǎn)業(yè)與功能食品成分學術研討會論文匯編[C];2007年

5 喻道軍;徐兆發(fā);王雨;賀安寧;徐斌;楊敬華;;α-硫辛酸和�；撬釋︽k致毒性影響的實驗[A];中國毒理學會第四屆全國學術會議論文（摘要）集[C];2005年

6 吳晨光;沈莉敏;姚翡;柳迎昭;;α-硫辛酸對糖尿病大鼠腎臟保護作用機制的實驗研究[A];2008內(nèi)分泌代謝性疾病系列研討會暨中青年英文論壇論文匯編[C];2008年

7 湯智慧;王波;郭代紅;黃清杰;熊娜;;α-硫辛酸注射液不良反應的發(fā)生率及相關因素分析[A];2012年全國醫(yī)院藥學學術年會暨第72屆世界藥學大會衛(wèi)星會論文集[C];2012年

8 董維平;丁曉穎;彭永德;程群;王育瑤;;α-硫辛酸對脂肪細胞引致的胰島炎癥的保護作用[A];2008內(nèi)分泌代謝性疾病系列研討會暨中青年英文論壇論文匯編[C];2008年

9 顧北令;陳峰;趙瑛;;α-硫辛酸對糖尿病神經(jīng)病變大鼠坐骨神經(jīng)蛋白激酶C活性的影響[A];中國病理生理學會受體、腫瘤和免疫專業(yè)委員會聯(lián)合學術會議論文匯編[C];2010年

10 湯正義;曹相林;寧光;魯艷;;α-硫辛酸對糖尿病神經(jīng)病變的治療作用和臨床應用展望[A];2006第六屆中國藥學會學術年會論文集[C];2006年

相關博士學位論文 前5條

1 謝翠松;α-硫辛酸與丹參治療糖尿病下肢血管病變的療效比較及可能機制探討[D];南方醫(yī)科大學;2012年

2 姜蘇蓉;α-硫辛酸對活性氮介導心肌損傷的保護作用及其機制研究[D];南京醫(yī)科大學;2013年

3 李大偉;α-硫辛酸對帕金森病細胞模型保護作用的蛋白質(zhì)組學研究[D];吉林大學;2013年

4 鄧超;α-硫辛酸抗大鼠心肌缺血再灌注損傷中的保護作用及其機制的研究[D];第四軍醫(yī)大學;2013年

5 喻道軍;α-硫辛酸、牛磺酸對鎘致大鼠氧化損傷和Bax、JNK基因RNAi對鎘致293細胞凋亡影響的實驗研究[D];中國醫(yī)科大學;2006年

相關碩士學位論文 前10條

1 李博鵬;α-硫辛酸對糖尿病周圍神經(jīng)病變患者循環(huán)內(nèi)皮祖細胞數(shù)量的影響[D];河北醫(yī)科大學;2015年

2 趙敏;α-硫辛酸對鎘致雌性大鼠生殖毒性作用的干預研究[D];河北醫(yī)科大學;2007年

3 孫耀冉;α-硫辛酸合成工藝研究[D];河北師范大學;2004年

4 康雅萍;α-硫辛酸對糖尿病大鼠心肌損傷的保護作用[D];遼寧醫(yī)學院;2012年

5 楊月蓮;α-硫辛酸緩釋片的制備及其對新西蘭兔藥效學研究[D];南方醫(yī)科大學;2007年

6 劉枘岢;α-硫辛酸與維生素C對2型糖尿病患者氧化應激水平及炎癥因子影響的比較研究[D];廣州醫(yī)學院;2010年

7 張衛(wèi)國;超重人群口服抗氧化劑α-硫辛酸預防心血管危險因素的交叉試驗研究[D];新疆醫(yī)科大學;2010年

8 周書川;α-硫辛酸對氧化損傷大鼠肝細胞糖代謝關鍵酶的影響及其機制的研究[D];天津醫(yī)科大學;2010年

9 陳格;利用離子液體共同凍干的脂肪酶催化拆分α-硫辛酸及其微波優(yōu)化[D];吉林大學;2014年

10 臧紅敏;α-硫辛酸對電點燃致癇大鼠海馬的保護作用及其機制研究[D];河北醫(yī)科大學;2014年

，

本文編號：2075362