【摘要】：回顧性分析2004年8月~2013年9月間收治的265例以下尿路癥狀(LUTS)為主訴的BPH患者臨床資料,根據(jù)術(shù)前檢查方法的不同分為A組(單純予腹部彩超)和B組(同時(shí)行經(jīng)腹彩超及尿流動(dòng)力學(xué)檢查),按前列腺大小各分三個(gè)亞組:A1(≤30g),A2(30~60g),A3(≥60g),B1(≤30g),B2(30~60g),B3(≥60g),A、B組患者均行手術(shù)治療。分別比較A、B、治療前后國(guó)際前列腺癥狀評(píng)分(IPSS)、殘余尿量(PVR)各項(xiàng)指標(biāo)并進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)分析。(1)A組大部分患者治療前后IPSS評(píng)分、指標(biāo)得到明顯改善(P0.05),但A1組IPSS評(píng)分差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05);B組患者治療前后的IPSS評(píng)分指標(biāo)均得到明顯改善(P0.05);(2)治療前A、B兩組間治療后IPSS評(píng)分兩組間有差異,但主要集中在小前列腺組(≤30g組),中等及較大前列腺組間的差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。尿流動(dòng)力學(xué)檢查對(duì)傳統(tǒng)檢查手段診斷BPH具有彌補(bǔ)作用,并可預(yù)估和評(píng)判術(shù)后效果。對(duì)治療方案的制定具有指導(dǎo)意義。
[Abstract]:The clinical data of 265 BPH patients with urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) who were admitted from August 2004 to September 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the difference of preoperative examination methods, the patients in group A were divided into three subgroups according to prostate size: A1 (鈮，

本文編號(hào)：2288139