【摘要】：目的探討1種改良限制性輸血策略指導急診患者圍術(shù)期RBC輸注的安全性、可行性及臨床價值。方法將急診需輸血的成年患者47名,隨機分為實驗組(以改良的輸血策略指導臨床輸血,n=23)和對照組(醫(yī)生依據(jù)《臨床輸血技術(shù)規(guī)范》按經(jīng)驗進行臨床輸血,n=24),記錄:1)估計失血量、手術(shù)時間、術(shù)中補液、麻醉后恢復室停留時間及住院時間,術(shù)后2、6、12、24、48、72 h及急診住院結(jié)束各時間點的HR、MAP、T,入院、入室、出室、術(shù)后24 h、術(shù)后72 h及住院結(jié)束時Hb的變化;2)輸血相關(guān)并發(fā)癥及死亡率;3)RBC輸注情況,圍術(shù)期自體或/和異體RBC輸注率與人均輸注量。結(jié)果實驗組與對照組患者估計失血量、手術(shù)時間、術(shù)中補液、PACU停留時間及住院時間相近(P0.05),術(shù)后各觀察時間點的HR、MAP及T比較差異甚小(P0.05);出室及術(shù)后24 h Hb(g/L),分別為90.31±11.40 vs 100.88±16.75(P0.05),入院、入室、術(shù)后72 h及急診住院時Hb相近(P0.05);2組均無輸血相關(guān)不良反應及死亡病例發(fā)生。異體RBC輸注率56.52%(13/23)vs 91.66%(22/24)(P0.05);人均輸血量(U)分別為2.00±2.41 vs 6.04±5.48(P0.05),已輸血患者異體紅細胞的人均輸注量(U)3.53±2.18 vs 6.59±5.4(P0.05)。結(jié)論采用本研究所涉改良限制性輸血策略或可更安全、有效指導臨床急診輸血,值得臨床進一步研究。
[Abstract]:Objective to explore the safety, feasibility and clinical value of a modified restrictive transfusion strategy for perioperative RBC infusion in emergency patients. Methods 47 adult patients who needed blood transfusion in emergency department were randomly divided into two groups: the experimental group (using modified transfusion strategy to guide the clinical transfusion) and the control group (the doctors performed the clinical blood transfusion according to the experience according to the Technical Specification for Clinical Transfusion), and the blood loss was recorded at 1: 1. Operation time, intraoperative fluid resuscitation, recovery room stay time and hospitalization time after anesthesia, HRP MAPT at every time point after operation, admission, entry and exit, and HRP MAPT at the end of emergency hospital stay were 26 / 12, 24 / 48 / 72 h after operation, respectively. Changes of HB at 24 h, 72 h after operation and at the end of hospitalization 2) transfusion related complications and mortality (3) RBC infusion, perioperative autologous or / and allogeneic RBC infusion rate and per capita infusion volume. Results the mean blood loss, operative time, stay time and hospitalization time of the patients in the experimental group and the control group were similar (P0.05). There was no significant difference in map and T between the observation time points after operation (P0.05), and the differences between the two groups were 90.31 鹵11.40 vs 100.88 鹵16.75 (P0.05), respectively, compared with the control group (P 0.05), and the difference of HRN map and T between the two groups was not significant (P0.05), and the difference was 90.31 鹵11.40 vs 100.88 鹵16.75 (P0.05), respectively. There were no transfusion related adverse reactions and death cases in both groups (P0.05). The transfusion rate of allogeneic RBC was 56.52% (13 / 23) vs 91.66% (22 / 24) (P0.05), and the (U) per capita transfusion was 2.00 鹵2.41 vs 6.04 鹵5.48 (P0.05), and the (U) of allogeneic erythrocytes was 3.53 鹵2.18 vs 6.59 鹵5.4 (P0.05). Conclusion the modified restrictive blood transfusion strategy mentioned in this study may be more safe and effective in guiding clinical emergency blood transfusion, which is worthy of further clinical study.
【作者單位】： 遵義醫(yī)學院附屬醫(yī)院麻醉科;四川大學華西醫(yī)院麻醉科;
【基金】：衛(wèi)生部衛(wèi)生行業(yè)專項(NO:201002005) 貴州省社會發(fā)展攻關(guān)項目(黔科合SY字[2015]3051號) 遵義市科技計劃項目(遵市科合社字[201475號])
【分類號】：R457.1

【二級參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 馮建華;尤國興;王瑛;闞雪梅;趙蓮;周虹;;Wistar大鼠重度失血性休克模型制備影響因素的研究[J];軍事醫(yī)學;2011年08期

2 鄧碩曾;葉菱;劉進;;輸血指征與容量治療[J];臨床麻醉學雜志;2009年06期

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)會議論文 前3條

1 陳尚寶;羅良;沃建中;;策略指導對8-11歲兒童解決加法等值問題的影響[A];第十屆全國心理學學術(shù)大會論文摘要集[C];2005年

2 張東;;高職課堂教學中的學習策略指導[A];2010無錫職教教師論壇論文集[C];2010年

3 楊穎奇;;論新四軍發(fā)展中周恩來的戰(zhàn)略策略指導[A];黃橋戰(zhàn)役史新探——紀念黃橋戰(zhàn)役勝利60周年學術(shù)研討會論文集[C];2000年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前7條

1 陳小梅;初中英語課堂學習策略指導之調(diào)查與分析[D];華東師范大學;2006年

2 王文（石羨）;學習策略指導在衛(wèi)�；瘜W教學中的實施探索[D];福建師范大學;2003年

3 林紅;融合交際法和策略指導的綜合語法教學[D];福建師范大學;2007年

4 王芳;初中英語教師實施學習策略指導的調(diào)查研究[D];首都師范大學;2009年

5 張玉鳳;以策略指導為基礎的高中英語閱讀教學及其效率的研究[D];東北師范大學;2006年

6 于曉紅;聽力教學中的元認知策略指導[D];遼寧師范大學;2004年

7 王艷利;語義圖策略指導下的初中英語詞匯教學[D];山西師范大學;2010年

，

本文編號：2189947