【摘要】：目的設(shè)計(jì)兩種種植體支持式下頜半口全牙列固定義齒,研究在不同下頜骨垂直高度降低情況下種植體應(yīng)力分布情況。方法利用錐束計(jì)算機(jī)斷層掃描成像(CBCT)掃描下頜骨及上部義齒,形成下頜骨基準(zhǔn)模型,將基準(zhǔn)模型中下頜骨垂直高度分別下降0、5、10和15mm,組裝種植體后,建立頦孔前6枚平行種植體支持和"All-on-four"支持的不同下頜骨垂直高度的種植體有限元模型,分別為6-種植體模型和4-種植體模型,共兩組(8個(gè))。在右下頜第一磨牙中央窩靜態(tài)加載250N垂直力,用Ansys 15.0軟件進(jìn)行模型各部分的應(yīng)力分析。結(jié)果在相同的加載條件下,種植體最大應(yīng)力值位于頸部;兩組8個(gè)模型最大應(yīng)力值分布顯示,不同下頜骨垂直高度下4-種植體組的最大應(yīng)力值在40.12~49.06 MPa之間,6-種植體組的最大應(yīng)力值在80.62~109.64MPa之間;6-種植體組的最大應(yīng)力值是4-種植體組的2倍。兩組模型中種植體最大應(yīng)力在下頜骨垂直高度降低5mm時(shí)均表現(xiàn)為最低,隨著下頜骨垂直高度降低,應(yīng)力逐漸增大,而垂直高度下降0mm的模型最大應(yīng)力要略大于下降5mm模型。結(jié)論 4-種植體和6-種植體支持的無(wú)牙頜固定義齒在相對(duì)極端的載荷下種植體都沒(méi)有出現(xiàn)破壞性應(yīng)力,4-種植體有著更加合理的應(yīng)力分布;下頜骨垂直高度下降5mm組應(yīng)力最小,說(shuō)明適當(dāng)降低垂直高度有利于種植體應(yīng)力更加合理的分布。
[Abstract]:Objective to design two kinds of implant-supported mandibular full dentures and to study the stress distribution of the implants under different mandibular vertical height reduction. Methods the mandibular reference model was established by using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to scan the mandible and the upper denture. The vertical height of the mandible in the reference model was reduced by 0 ~ 5 ~ 10 mm and 15 mm, respectively, and the implant was assembled. The finite element models of different mandibular vertical height supported by six parallel implants and "All-on-four" were established, which were 6-implant model and 4-implant model respectively, two groups (8). The vertical force of 250N was statically loaded in the central fossa of the right first molar, and the stress of each part of the model was analyzed by Ansys 15.0 software. Results under the same loading conditions, the maximum stress value of the implant was located in the neck, and the distribution of the maximum stress value of the two groups of 8 models showed that, The maximum stress values of the 4- implant group at different mandibular vertical heights were between 40.12 and 49.06 MPA and the maximum stress values of the 6-implant group were between 80.62 and 109.64 MPA, and the maximum stress values in the 4-implant group were twice as high as those in the 4-implant group. In the two groups of models, the maximum implant stress was the lowest when the vertical height of mandible decreased 5mm. With the decrease of vertical height of mandible, the stress gradually increased, and the maximum stress of the model with vertical height decreasing 0mm was slightly larger than that of 5mm model. Conclusion neither 4-implant nor 6-implant supported edentulous fixed denture has more reasonable stress distribution under relatively extreme loads, and the lower mandibular vertical height is the smallest in 5mm group. It shows that proper reduction of vertical height is beneficial to more reasonable distribution of implant stress.
【作者單位】： 第二軍醫(yī)大學(xué)長(zhǎng)海醫(yī)院口腔科;上海交通大學(xué)醫(yī)學(xué)院附屬新華醫(yī)院口腔科;同濟(jì)大學(xué)生命科學(xué)與技術(shù)學(xué)院;
【基金】：上海市科學(xué)技術(shù)委員會(huì)科研計(jì)劃項(xiàng)目(12ZR1438400)~~
【分類號(hào)】：R783.6

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 莫浩勛,朱迎新;間接法制作臨時(shí)固定義齒54例分析[J];廣東牙病防治;2000年03期

2 潘小波,鐘愛喜,彭利輝,何培俠;650件固定義齒拆除原因及使用時(shí)間分析[J];廣東牙病防治;2000年04期

3 王應(yīng)文,畢艷暉,胡玉萍,李娜,童永成;1200例固定義齒試戴中出現(xiàn)的問(wèn)題及處理[J];昆明醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期

4 王亞萍;;60歲以上患者固定義齒的修復(fù)分析[J];寧夏醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2007年07期

5 陳瑞華;;固定義齒戴用后可能出現(xiàn)的問(wèn)題和處理[J];求醫(yī)問(wèn)藥(下半月);2011年12期

6 劉衛(wèi)國(guó);;對(duì)固定義齒進(jìn)行修復(fù)后出現(xiàn)牙體癥狀的處理[J];中國(guó)醫(yī)學(xué)創(chuàng)新;2013年28期

7 錢端申;酸蝕法對(duì)前牙固定義齒的固位力——幾種固位方法在體外的比較[J];國(guó)外醫(yī)學(xué).口腔醫(yī)學(xué)分冊(cè);1981年04期

8 鄭弟澤;固定義齒的臨床觀察[J];國(guó)外醫(yī)學(xué).口腔醫(yī)學(xué)分冊(cè);1981年06期

9 陳思婭;;鑄金樹脂粘結(jié)前牙固定義齒的臨床評(píng)價(jià)[J];國(guó)外醫(yī)學(xué).口腔醫(yī)學(xué)分冊(cè);1985年03期

10 王耀華;金膠連合樹脂固定義齒[J];山東醫(yī)藥;1990年06期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前7條

1 梁文祥;鄧卜師;毛繼德;李艷玲;;生物活性玻璃陶瓷涂鈦螺旋狀復(fù)合種植體的臨床觀察[A];中華口腔醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)成立大會(huì)暨第六次全國(guó)口腔醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文匯編[C];1996年

2 許偉;;塑料底板在固定義齒模型制作中的應(yīng)用[A];第七次全國(guó)口腔修復(fù)工藝學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)交流會(huì)論文匯編[C];2011年

3 游素蘭;黃遠(yuǎn)亮;孫e，

本文編號(hào)：2136205