本文選題：前牙開(牙合) + 高角型��； 參考：《大連醫(yī)科大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：目的:通過對(duì)高角開(牙合)患者正畸前后X線頭顱側(cè)位片的測(cè)量,回顧分析在兩種不同拔牙模式下矯正開(牙合)時(shí),牙齒移動(dòng)的不同機(jī)制以及對(duì)面部垂直向變化的影響是否存在差異,從而為臨床矯治設(shè)計(jì)提供參考。方法:從沈陽市口腔醫(yī)院正畸科2008年-2013年間就診的患者中選取24例已經(jīng)結(jié)束的高角開(牙合)患者,38°SN-MP54°,32°FH-MP47°。為避免患者在調(diào)整磨牙關(guān)系時(shí)產(chǎn)生的誤差,所有患者的磨牙關(guān)系為中性。24例患者均為輕中度開(牙合),前牙區(qū)至少有4顆切牙呈開(牙合)狀態(tài),開(牙合)程度0-4.2mm不等。對(duì)于有吐舌、口呼吸等不良習(xí)慣的患者,首先建議破除不良習(xí)慣。為了觀察磨牙前移量,兩組患者上下頜均為輕中度擁擠(1mm擁擠度5mm)。上下頜牙弓寬度協(xié)調(diào),前牙Bolton指數(shù)均正常,所有患者治療前均沒有顳下頜關(guān)節(jié)癥狀。將24名患者按照拔牙方式的不同分為兩組,拔除4顆第一前磨牙組為E4組(男2例女10例,初診平均年齡16.89±3.26歲),拔除4顆第二前磨牙組為E5組(女12例,初診平均年齡16.89±4.81歲)。所有患者采用0.022英寸槽溝系統(tǒng)的直絲弓矯治器,前牙整體滑動(dòng)內(nèi)收法關(guān)閉拔牙間隙,最終磨牙均達(dá)到安氏Ⅰ類咬合關(guān)系。所有患者在正畸過程中均沒有使用后牙(牙合)墊、口內(nèi)輔弓(如MEAW)、口外牽引裝置(如高位牽引頭帽等)及影響磨牙前移的強(qiáng)支抗裝置(如種植釘、Nance弓、TPA等)。正畸前后頭顱側(cè)位片采用同一X射線系統(tǒng)進(jìn)行拍攝,并由同一正畸醫(yī)師進(jìn)行描片測(cè)量。本研究測(cè)量指標(biāo)包括牙性指標(biāo)12項(xiàng),骨性指標(biāo)15項(xiàng)。使用SSPS 17.0軟件對(duì)測(cè)量結(jié)果進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)分析,組內(nèi)前后變化采用配對(duì)t檢驗(yàn),組間牙齒及顱頜面垂直向變化使用獨(dú)立樣本t檢驗(yàn),P0.05具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。結(jié)果:(1)治療前兩組各項(xiàng)指標(biāo)沒有顯著差異(P0.05);(2)兩組治療后開(牙合)均得到明顯改善,E4組覆(牙合)增加3.27±0.94(P0.001),E5組覆(牙合)增加3.59±1.34(P0.001);(3)兩組矯正后前下面高及前面高均增加,E4組平均增加量分別為3.01±2.41mm和3.17±3.06mm,E5組平均增加量分別為2.90±2.01mm和3.56±3.65mm,均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05);(4)兩組下頜平面角治療前后均沒有差異(P0.05);(5)E5組上下頜第一磨牙前移量大于E4組(P0.05),且中切牙回收量小于E4組(P0.05);(6)兩組治療前后變量間其他測(cè)量指標(biāo)沒有顯著差異(P0.05)。結(jié)論:1.無論哪種拔牙模式都不能使高角開(牙合)患者產(chǎn)生下頜骨的逆時(shí)針旋轉(zhuǎn),亦不能使前下面高減小;2.在臨床上設(shè)計(jì)拔牙矯治方案時(shí),應(yīng)更多的考慮患者的擁擠度,面凸度,磨牙咬合關(guān)系,牙齒的健康狀況等。
[Abstract]:Objective: to retrospectively analyze the effects of two different extraction modes on orthodontic radiographic lateral radiographs in patients with high angle open (occlusal) teeth. The different mechanisms of tooth movement and the influence on the vertical change of face are different, so as to provide reference for clinical orthodontic design. Methods: from 2008 to 2013, 24 patients with high angle open (occlusal) were selected from orthodontic department of Shenyang Stomatology Hospital. They were 38 擄SN-MP54 擄and 32 擄FH-MP47 擄. In order to avoid the error in adjusting the molar relationship, the molar relationship of all patients was neutral. 24 patients were mild or moderate open (occlusal), at least 4 incisors in the anterior teeth were open (occlusal), and the degree of open (occlusal) 0-4.2mm was different. For patients with bad habits such as spitting and breathing, it is first recommended to break down bad habits. In order to observe the anterior displacement of molars, the upper and lower mandibles in both groups were 1mm crowding 5mm. The width of maxillary arch was coordinated and Bolton index of anterior teeth was normal. All the patients had no temporomandibular joint symptoms before treatment. 24 patients were divided into two groups according to different extraction methods. Four first premolars were extracted in E4 group (male, 2 female, 10 cases, mean age 16.89 鹵3.26 years old), and 4 second premolars were extracted in E5 group (12 female, mean age 16.89 鹵4.81 years old). All the patients were treated with a straight wire appliance with a 0.022 inch grooving system. The extraction space was closed by the method of integral sliding and closing of the anterior teeth, and the final molar achieved the class I occlusal relationship. During orthodontic treatment, all patients did not use posterior teeth (occlusal) pad, intraoral arch (MEAW), extraoral traction device (such as high traction head cap) and strong Anchorage device (such as implant nailing Nance arch TPA). The lateral head radiographs were taken with the same X-ray system and measured by the same orthodontic physician before and after orthodontics. This study included 12 dental indexes and 15 bone indexes. SSPS 17.0 software was used to analyze the results of statistical analysis, the changes of pre-and post-group changes were matched t test, and the vertical changes of teeth and craniomaxillofacial were analyzed by independent sample t-test (P0.05). Results: (1) there was no significant difference between the two groups before treatment (P0.05); (2). After treatment, the occlusal (occlusal) increased by 3.27 鹵0.94 (P0.001) and 3.59 鹵1.34 (P0.001); (3) respectively. The average increment of the two groups were 3.01 鹵2.41mm and 3.17 鹵3.06mmE5, respectively, which were 2.90 鹵2.01mm and 3.56 鹵3.65mm, respectively (P0.05); (4). There was no significant difference between the two groups before and after treatment (P0.05); (5). The anterior displacement of the first molar in the E5 group was higher than that in the E4 group (P0.05), and the anterior displacement of the first molar in the E5 group was higher than that in the E4 group (P0.05). The amount of tooth recovery was less than that of E4 group (P0.05); (6). There was no significant difference in other measurements between the two groups before and after treatment (P0.05). Conclusion 1. Neither extraction model can cause the mandible to rotate counterclockwise in high angle open (occlusal) patients, nor can it reduce the anterior and lower height by 2%. In clinical design, more consideration should be given to the degree of crowding, facial convexity, molar occlusion, tooth health and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：R783.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉遠(yuǎn)林;鄒暉;武玉海;李朝暉;;垂直支持矯治器對(duì)高角患者垂直向位置關(guān)系的影響[J];臨床口腔醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2013年09期

2 賀涵;賀紅;;種植體支抗在正畸治療中垂直向控制的應(yīng)用進(jìn)展[J];國(guó)際口腔醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2013年05期

3 王鵬;;改良橫腭桿對(duì)高角患者后牙垂直向控制的比較分析[J];現(xiàn)代醫(yī)藥衛(wèi)生;2013年06期

4 唐開紅;王增全;;快速磨牙壓低器矯正骨性前牙開牙合畸形7例臨床效果評(píng)價(jià)[J];中國(guó)實(shí)用口腔科雜志;2012年09期

5 羅曉冰;張馥蘭;杜池;;多曲方絲弓與鎳鈦搖椅弓的臨床應(yīng)用效果比較[J];臨床口腔醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2010年07期

6 陳莉莉;林久祥;許天民;;應(yīng)用頸椎骨齡定量分期法評(píng)價(jià)正常青少年上下頜骨垂直向及縱向變化的研究[J];臨床口腔醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2010年06期

7 張清華;馮云霞;張燕;;開患者固定矯治配合肌功能訓(xùn)練臨床療效觀察[J];中國(guó)實(shí)用口腔科雜志;2010年01期

8 歐陽莉;傅民魁;周彥恒;;正畸治療中高角病例的垂直向控制[J];口腔正畸學(xué);2008年04期

9 張興中;周彥恒;林久祥;;北京地區(qū)13~15歲正常個(gè)體面部垂直向生長(zhǎng)的縱向研究[J];實(shí)用口腔醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2006年04期

10 王海嵐;賈綺林;;前牙開的病因、診斷及治療[J];現(xiàn)代口腔醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2006年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：2094184