【摘要】：目的：（1）探討復(fù)發(fā)性抑郁緩解期個(gè)體對(duì)情緒面孔是否存在注意偏向及其注意偏向機(jī)制。（2）通過(guò)注意力訓(xùn)練實(shí)驗(yàn)，探討該訓(xùn)練是否能引導(dǎo)復(fù)發(fā)性抑郁緩解期個(gè)體對(duì)消極刺激的注意有所減少。 方法：選用Beck抑郁自評(píng)量表（BDI）篩選出正常個(gè)體24人和抑郁情緒個(gè)體21人,采用漢密爾頓抑郁量表（HDRS-17）篩選復(fù)發(fā)性抑郁緩解期個(gè)體24人。本研究分為兩個(gè)實(shí)驗(yàn)。實(shí)驗(yàn)一為眼動(dòng)實(shí)驗(yàn)，選用情緒面孔圖片作為實(shí)驗(yàn)材料，通過(guò)分析實(shí)驗(yàn)參與者的眼動(dòng)指標(biāo)來(lái)探討復(fù)發(fā)性抑郁緩解期個(gè)體的注意偏向機(jī)制；實(shí)驗(yàn)二為認(rèn)知干預(yù)實(shí)驗(yàn)，通過(guò)比較實(shí)驗(yàn)參與者在注意力訓(xùn)練前后的注意偏向特點(diǎn)，探討注意力訓(xùn)練能否有效地使實(shí)驗(yàn)參與者表現(xiàn)出對(duì)消極圖片的選擇性回避。 結(jié)果：（1）正常組和復(fù)發(fā)性抑郁緩解組被試在未到達(dá)興趣區(qū)之前的注視時(shí)間上差異不大，而抑郁情緒組被試在未到達(dá)悲傷表情圖片之前注視時(shí)間明顯小于高興表情圖片。 （2）正常組被試對(duì)高興表情面孔的首視點(diǎn)持續(xù)時(shí)間與悲傷表情面孔的首視點(diǎn)持續(xù)時(shí)間沒(méi)有差異，抑郁情緒組被試對(duì)高興表情面孔的首視點(diǎn)持續(xù)時(shí)間大于悲傷表情面孔的首視點(diǎn)持續(xù)時(shí)間，復(fù)發(fā)性抑郁緩解組被試對(duì)高興表情面孔的首視點(diǎn)持續(xù)時(shí)間小于悲傷表情面孔的首視點(diǎn)持續(xù)時(shí)間。 （3）對(duì)于高興表情面孔圖片，三組被試在注視點(diǎn)個(gè)數(shù)上沒(méi)有差異。對(duì)于悲傷表情面孔圖片，在注視點(diǎn)個(gè)數(shù)上抑郁組要多于緩解組，緩解組要多于正常組。 （4）對(duì)于高興情緒面孔圖片，總注視時(shí)間正常組大于抑郁組，抑郁組大于緩解組；對(duì)于悲傷情緒面孔圖片，在總注視時(shí)間上緩解組要大于抑郁組，抑郁組要大于正常組。 （5）與訓(xùn)練前相比，三組被試在注意力訓(xùn)練之后對(duì)圖像消極部分的注視點(diǎn)個(gè)數(shù)明顯減少，對(duì)圖像消極部分的注視時(shí)間明顯減少。 結(jié)論：（1）復(fù)發(fā)性抑郁緩解期個(gè)體對(duì)情緒面孔圖片存在注意偏向，且注意偏向的模式在悲傷面孔和高興面孔之間存在差異。對(duì)悲傷面孔表現(xiàn)為一種注意警覺(jué)—注意維持的模式，對(duì)高興面孔表現(xiàn)為注意回避的行為模式。 （2）注意力訓(xùn)練不論對(duì)于正常個(gè)體、抑郁情緒個(gè)體還是復(fù)發(fā)性抑郁緩解個(gè)體都是有效的。正常個(gè)體和緩解期個(gè)體在積極訓(xùn)練條件下，與訓(xùn)練前相比，他們?cè)谟?xùn)練后對(duì)消極刺激的注意都明顯減少，，然而這樣的訓(xùn)練效果在中性訓(xùn)練條件下并沒(méi)有表現(xiàn)出來(lái)。
[Abstract]:Objective: (1) to investigate whether there is attention bias and its mechanism to emotional face in individuals in remission stage of recurrent depression. (2) through attention training experiment, To explore whether this training can guide individuals in remission stage of recurrent depression to pay less attention to negative stimuli. Methods: 24 normal individuals and 21 depressed individuals were selected by Beck self-rating depression scale (BDI), and 24 individuals in remission stage of recurrent depression were screened by Hamilton depression scale (HDRS-17). This study is divided into two experiments. The first experiment was eye movement experiment. Emotional face pictures were selected as experimental materials to explore the mechanism of attention bias in individuals in remission stage of recurrent depression by analyzing the eye movement indexes of the participants in the experiment. The second experiment is cognitive intervention experiment. By comparing the characteristics of attention bias before and after attention training, this paper discusses whether attention training can effectively make the experimental participants show selective avoidance of negative pictures. Results: (1) there was no significant difference in the fixation time between the normal group and the recurrent depression remission group before reaching the region of interest, but the fixation time in the depression group was significantly lower than that in the happy expression picture before reaching the sad expression picture. (2) there was no difference in the first view duration between the happy expression face and the sad expression face in the normal group. In the depression group, the first view duration of the happy expression face was longer than that of the sad expression face. In the recurrent depression remission group, the first view duration of happy facial expression was less than that of sad facial face. (3) for the pictures of happy faces, there was no difference in the number of gaze points among the three groups. For sad facial images, the number of gaze points in depression group was more than that in remission group, and that in remission group was more than that in normal group. (4) for the picture of happy emotional face, the total fixation time of normal group was longer than that of depression group, and that of depression group was larger than that of remission group, and for the picture of sad emotional face, the total fixation time of remission group was larger than that of depression group, and that of depression group was larger than that of normal group. (5) compared with before training, the number of fixation points on the negative part of the image decreased significantly and the fixation time on the negative part of the image decreased significantly in the three groups after attention training. Conclusion: (1) in the remission stage of recurrent depression, individuals have attention bias to emotional face pictures, and the pattern of attention bias is different between sad face and happy face. For sad faces, it is a pattern of attention vigilance and maintenance, and for happy faces, it is a pattern of attention avoidance. (2) attention training is effective for normal individuals, depressed individuals and individuals with recurrent depression relief. Under the condition of active training, both normal individuals and individuals in remission stage paid less attention to negative stimuli after training than before training, but the training effect did not show under the condition of neutral training.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：R749.4;B842

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉陽(yáng)娥;馮正直;戴琴;王鳳;廖承菊;;重復(fù)呈現(xiàn)情緒面孔對(duì)抑郁癥狀大學(xué)生注意偏向的影響[J];第三軍醫(yī)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2009年09期

2 王丹芬,雷曉明,劉臨蘭,李丹琳;中國(guó)人的抑郁癥及其社會(huì)文化思考[J];中國(guó)全科醫(yī)學(xué);2004年05期

3 楊福收,張玉娟,郭志華;社會(huì)心理干預(yù)對(duì)復(fù)發(fā)性抑郁癥患者生活質(zhì)量等因素的影響[J];中國(guó)臨床康復(fù);2005年04期

4 王衛(wèi);青少年抑郁的預(yù)防:青少年應(yīng)變力輔導(dǎo)計(jì)劃簡(jiǎn)介[J];心理科學(xué);2000年04期

5 陳傳鋒;李湘蘭;胡珍玉;;老年抑郁個(gè)體注意偏向的發(fā)生階段[J];心理科學(xué);2011年03期

6 李海江;楊娟;賈磊;張慶林;;不同自尊水平者的注意偏向[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2011年08期

7 任延濤;韓玉昌;隋雪;;視覺(jué)搜索過(guò)程中的眼跳及其機(jī)制[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2006年03期

8 戴琴;馮正直;;抑郁患者的注意偏向[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2008年02期

9 戴琴;馮正直;;不同抑郁狀態(tài)個(gè)體對(duì)情緒面孔的評(píng)價(jià)研究[J];應(yīng)用心理學(xué);2007年04期

10 高笑;陳紅;;消極身體意象者的注意偏向研究進(jìn)展[J];中國(guó)臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2006年03期

本文編號(hào)：2478057