【摘要】：[目的]調(diào)查石門二路街道高齡獨居老人的抑郁癥狀情況,并初步探討綜合心理干預對抑郁癥狀的改善效果。 [方法]對石門二路街道80歲及以上獨居老人采用二階段隨機抽樣法抽取64人進行詢問調(diào)查,并進行抑郁自評量表(Self-rating Depression Scale,SDS)測評。按抑郁癥狀等級進行分層隨機抽樣,將64名老人分為干預組和對照組,每組32名老人。干預組進行為期半年的綜合心理干預,包括家訪、心理疏導、集中授課、與家屬積極聯(lián)系。而對照組則只進行常規(guī)健康管理。半年后,再次對兩組老人進行SDS測評,以了解綜合心理干預對老年人抑郁癥狀的的改善情況。 [結(jié)果]經(jīng)SDS評分后發(fā)現(xiàn),64名高齡獨居老人中輕、中、重度抑郁的患者分別占40.6%、15.6%和0%。干預前干預組與對照組SDS評分差異均無統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05),經(jīng)過半年綜合心理干預,干預組中SDS評分均數(shù)從55.0下降到40.9,未見中度抑郁癥狀的老人,輕度抑郁癥狀老人比例從40.6%下降到16.7%。而對照組中SDS評分均數(shù)從54.7上升到56.5,輕度抑郁癥狀老人比例無變化,而中度抑郁癥狀老人比例從15.6%上升到29.0%。干預組SDS評分均數(shù)低于干預前水平和對照組同期水平。 [結(jié)論]經(jīng)過半年綜合心理干預的高齡獨居老人的抑郁癥狀得以明顯改善,而僅進行常規(guī)健康管理的高齡獨居老人的抑郁癥狀有輕微加重趨勢,說明綜合心理干預對高齡獨居老人抑郁癥狀有積極作用,今后社區(qū)基層組織及醫(yī)院應加大對高齡獨居老人綜合心理干預的力度。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the depressive symptoms of the elderly solitary elderly in the second street of Shimen, and to explore the effect of comprehensive psychological intervention on the improvement of depressive symptoms. [methods] Sixty-four single people aged 80 years old and above in the second street of Shimen were investigated by two-stage random sampling, and self-rating depression scale (Self-rating Depression Scale,SDS) was carried out. 64 elderly people were divided into intervention group and control group with 32 elderly in each group. The intervention group conducted six months of comprehensive psychological intervention, including home visits, psychological counseling, intensive teaching, and positive contact with family members. In the control group, only routine health management was performed. Six months later, two groups of old people were tested with SDS again to understand the improvement of depression symptoms by comprehensive psychological intervention. [results] according to SDS score, the percentage of mild, moderate and severe depression in 64 elderly persons living alone was 40. 6% and 0. 6% respectively. There was no significant difference in SDS scores between the intervention group and the control group before intervention (P0.05). After half a year comprehensive psychological intervention, the average SDS score in the intervention group decreased from 55.0 to 40.9, and the proportion of the elderly with mild depressive symptoms decreased from 40.6% to 16.7%. In the control group, the average of SDS scores increased from 54.7 to 56.5, while the proportion of the elderly with mild depression did not change, while the proportion of the elderly with moderate depressive symptoms increased from 15.6% to 29.0%. The mean of SDS score in the intervention group was lower than that before the intervention and the control group. [conclusion] after six months of comprehensive psychological intervention, the depression symptoms of the elderly single elderly people were improved obviously, while the depression symptoms of the elderly single elderly people who only carried out routine health management had a slight exacerbation trend. It is concluded that comprehensive psychological intervention plays a positive role in the depression symptoms of the elderly living alone, and the community grass-roots organizations and hospitals should strengthen the comprehensive psychological intervention for the elderly living alone in the future.
【學位授予單位】：復旦大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：R749.4

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孫唐水;郭安;;城市獨居老人需要社區(qū)的精神關(guān)愛——南京市獨居老人調(diào)查[J];安慶師范學院學報(社會科學版);2011年08期

2 繆衛(wèi)紅;;甘麥大棗湯合百合地黃湯治療老年抑郁癥19例臨床觀察[J];中醫(yī)藥導報;2012年05期

3 馬靜;席淑華;朱麗妹;;社區(qū)高齡獨居老人社會支持狀況調(diào)查分析[J];解放軍護理雜志;2009年06期

4 徐勇;吳海蘇;徐一峰;;病人健康問卷抑郁量表(PHQ-9)在社區(qū)老年人群中的應用——信度與效度分析[J];上海精神醫(yī)學;2007年05期

5 周建芳;薛志強;方芳;汪作為;張少平;陳銀娣;;獨居老人抑郁癥狀和抑郁癥的調(diào)查[J];上海精神醫(yī)學;2008年03期

6 葉青,顧小揚,劉建鋒,趙義林;萬拉法新與帕羅西汀治療抑郁癥對照觀察[J];臨床精神醫(yī)學雜志;2002年02期

7 丁冬紅,何海霞,吳殿龍;認知行為療法對老年抑郁癥的治療作用[J];臨床精神醫(yī)學雜志;2004年05期

8 彭亮;王裔艷;;上海高齡獨居老人研究[J];南方人口;2010年05期

9 楊秋霞;曹雪霞;;老年抑郁癥86例誤診誤治分析[J];臨床誤診誤治;2012年07期

10 鄭瞻培;;抑郁癥診斷現(xiàn)狀及藥物治療策略[J];現(xiàn)代實用醫(yī)學;2012年09期

，

本文編號：2264777