本文選題：妄想　切入點：效度　出處：《中國心理衛(wèi)生雜志》2014年09期

【摘要】：目的:引進妄想特征評定量表(CDRS),分析其評估精神分裂癥妄想患者的效度和信度。方法:經(jīng)原作者授權,將CDRS英文版經(jīng)翻譯和回譯后確定中文版(C-CDRS)。選取符合國際疾病與相關健康問題分類第10版(ICD-10)精神分裂癥診斷標準,存在妄想癥狀的患者137例完成C-CDRS評定,對數(shù)據(jù)進行探索性因素分析和內部一致性檢驗。選取其中73例患者間隔1周后重復評定C-CDRS,檢驗量表的重測信度。結果:C-CDRS共11個條目,探索性因素分析提取到認知、情感和怪異性3個因子,對方差的累計貢獻率為76.45%。C-CDRS總分的Cronbachα系數(shù)為0.83,3個因子的Cronbachα系數(shù)分別為0.84、0.77、0.78;C-CDRS總分的重測相關系數(shù)為0.85,3個因子的重測相關系數(shù)分別為0.86、0.82、0.83(均P0.01)。結論:妄想特征評定量表中文版的效度信度符合心理測量學要求,可以用于研究工作中精神分裂癥患者妄想的評估。
[Abstract]:Objective: to analyze the validity and reliability of CDRSs in the evaluation of delusional schizophrenic patients.Methods: with the authorization of the original author, the English version of CDRS was translated and retranslated to confirm the Chinese version.137 patients with delusional symptoms according to ICD-10 (International Classification of Disease and related Health problems) were selected to complete C-CDRS evaluation. The data were analyzed by exploratory factor analysis and internal consistency test.73 patients were selected to evaluate the C-CDRSs repeatedly after 1 week interval to test the retest reliability of the scale.Results there were 11 items in C-CDRS. Exploratory factor analysis extracted three factors: cognition, emotion and weirdness.瀵規(guī)柟宸殑绱璐＄尞鐜囦負76.45%.C-CDRS鎬誨垎鐨凜ronbach偽緋繪暟涓，

本文編號：1703511