發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-02-13 03:46

【摘要】：目的:通過(guò)觀察慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者心電圖額面P波電軸(?P)水平,以及分析其分別與體重指數(shù)(BMI)、殘總比(RV/TLC)、吸氣分?jǐn)?shù)(IC/TLC)、第一秒用力呼氣容積占預(yù)計(jì)值百分比(FEVI%pred)、MMRC評(píng)分指數(shù)、CAT評(píng)分相關(guān)性、COPD綜合評(píng)估的關(guān)系,探討?P在COPD患者診斷篩查、病情嚴(yán)重程度和預(yù)后評(píng)估中臨床應(yīng)用價(jià)值。方法:選擇2016年07月至2017年01月在昌吉州人民醫(yī)院內(nèi)科門(mén)診就診或住院的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者107名(男85例,女22例,年齡為63.70±9.26)為試驗(yàn)組,同期在門(mén)診體檢并與入選研究組性別、年齡相匹配健康人107名(男性85名,女性22名,平均年齡為62.27±8.75歲)為對(duì)照組。對(duì)試驗(yàn)組和對(duì)照組受試者測(cè)得身高、體重,行心電圖及肺功能檢查,對(duì)107例COPD受試者行改良的英國(guó)醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)研究委員會(huì)呼吸困難量表(MMRC)評(píng)分、慢性阻塞肺疾病評(píng)估測(cè)試(CAT)評(píng)分,依據(jù)COPD綜合評(píng)估把試驗(yàn)組107名COPD患者分為4級(jí):A級(jí)、B級(jí)、C級(jí)、D級(jí);各組數(shù)據(jù)用SPSSl7.0軟件進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)分析,比較額面P電軸在慢性阻塞肺疾病試驗(yàn)組與正常對(duì)照組間,A、B、C、D4級(jí)間差別,并分析額面P波電軸分別與體重指數(shù)(BMI)、吸氣分?jǐn)?shù)(IC/TLC)、殘總比(RV/TLC)、第一秒用力呼氣容積占預(yù)計(jì)值百分比(FEVI%pred)、MMRC評(píng)分指數(shù)、CAT生活質(zhì)量評(píng)分相關(guān)性。結(jié)果:1.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者額面P波電軸顯著大于正常對(duì)照組(P0.05);2.額面P電軸與BMI呈負(fù)相關(guān)(r=-0.203,P0.05)、與RV/TLC呈正相關(guān)(r=0.451,P0.01)、與IC/TLC呈負(fù)相關(guān)(r=-0.503,P0.01)、與FEVl%pmd呈負(fù)相關(guān)(r=-0.352,P0.01)、與mMRC評(píng)分呈正相關(guān)(r=0.432,P0.01)、與CAT評(píng)分呈正相關(guān)(r=0.405,P0.01)。3.COPD患者綜合評(píng)估分級(jí)各級(jí)?P的比較:D級(jí)額面P電軸明顯高于A級(jí)(P0.01)、B和C級(jí)(P0.05),A級(jí)額面P電軸低于B、C兩級(jí)(P0.05),余不同級(jí)別間無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)差異。結(jié)論:1.額面P波電軸垂直化在慢性阻塞性肺疾病診斷方面的敏感性、特異性均較高,有一定臨床應(yīng)用價(jià)值,并可用于評(píng)估其嚴(yán)重程度。
[Abstract]:Objective: to observe the level of P wave axis (? P) in frontal surface of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and to analyze its correlation with body mass index (BMI),) residual total ratio (RV/TLC), inspiratory fraction (IC/TLC), body mass index (BMI), total residual ratio (RV/TLC) and inspiratory fraction (IC/TLC). The percentage of forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEVI%pred), MMRC score, CAT score correlation, COPD comprehensive evaluation), to explore the clinical value of P in the diagnosis and screening, severity and prognosis evaluation of COPD patients. Methods: 107 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (85 males, 22 females, age 63.70 鹵9.26) were selected as experimental group. 107 healthy subjects (85 males and 22 females, with an average age of 62.27 鹵8.75 years) were matched with the sex and age of the study group at the same time. Height, weight, electrocardiogram and pulmonary function were measured in the test group and the control group, and (MMRC) scores of the modified BMA Respiratory dyspnea scale were performed on 107 subjects with COPD. According to the (CAT) score of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease evaluation test, 107 COPD patients in the trial group were divided into four grades: grade A, grade B, grade C and grade D according to the comprehensive evaluation of COPD. The data of each group were statistically analyzed by SPSSl7.0 software. The differences of frontal P axis and body mass index (BMI),) were compared between the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease test group and the normal control group, and the frontal P wave axis was compared with the body mass index (BMI),). Inspiratory fraction (IC/TLC), total residual ratio (RV/TLC), forced expiratory volume in the first second as a percentage of predicted value (FEVI%pred), MMRC score, CAT quality of life score) were correlated. Results: 1. P wave axis of frontal surface in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was significantly higher than that in normal control group (P0.05). There was a negative correlation between frontal P axis and BMI (P 0.05), positive correlation with RV/TLC (r P 0.01), negative correlation between P axis and IC/TLC (r P 0.01), and negative correlation between P axis and FEVl%pmd. There was a positive correlation with the mMRC score (r = 0.432P 0.01) and a positive correlation with the CAT score (r = 0.405, P < 0.05). Comparison of 3.COPD patients' comprehensive evaluation grade? P: grade D frontal P axis was significantly higher than A grade (P0.01), B and C grade (P0.05), A frontal P axis was lower than), A C grade (P0.05). There was no statistical difference between different grades. Conclusion: 1. The sensitivity and specificity of frontal P wave axis perpendicularity in the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is high. It has certain clinical application value and can be used to evaluate its severity.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：新疆醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：R563.9

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳麥林;;竇性P波電軸顯著左偏1例[J];實(shí)用心電學(xué)雜志;2006年04期

2 金懿峰;鄒仁妹;馬燕燕;;與呼吸相關(guān)的竇性P波電軸顯著左偏1例[J];實(shí)用心電學(xué)雜志;2009年06期

3 朱寄天;馮志強(qiáng);曾曉榮;;介紹一種不用圖表測(cè)定心電軸的方法——附100例兩種電軸測(cè)定法結(jié)果比較[J];瀘州醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1981年03期

4 吳曄良,黃峻,胡津育,丁爾乾;QRS電軸顯著左偏的臨床意義(附238例分析)[J];江蘇醫(yī)藥;1982年01期

5 齊幼齡;陳揚(yáng)選;林玉屏;;慢性肺原性心臟病心電圖P波電軸及PⅡ波面積的分析[J];廣西醫(yī)學(xué);1986年04期

6 吳杰;徐春芳;陸再英;Jan A.;Kors Peter R.;Rijnbeek;;中國(guó)人群額面QRS電軸的正常范圍[J];臨床心電學(xué)雜志;2006年01期

7 任在鎬;;目測(cè)電軸以哪一種方法最好?[J];心電學(xué)雜志;1987年01期

8 許文勝,王岳恒,張寧;P電軸正常范圍及其與慢性肺心病關(guān)系初探[J];臨床薈萃;2004年19期

9 王晉麗;石亞君;郭艷;趙立朝;郜玲;盧喜烈;;不確定電軸在先天性心臟病診斷中的價(jià)值[J];中華保健醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2012年06期

10 黃學(xué)易;;快速平均電軸測(cè)算表的設(shè)計(jì)[J];濟(jì)寧醫(yī)專學(xué)報(bào);1982年02期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前3條

1 康宏;白明;令文娟;張鉦;;完全性右束支傳導(dǎo)阻滯心電圖電軸分析[A];第十三次全國(guó)心血管病學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集[C];2011年

2 雷良榮;姚紅;成頌;;電軸異常左偏的收縮時(shí)間間期分析[A];第二屆全國(guó)心功能學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文摘要匯編[C];1990年

3 連苗軍;陳君柱;陶謙民;鄭良榮;陳瑤;;體表QRS波電軸與特發(fā)性室性心律失常成功消融關(guān)系的探討[A];2005年浙江省心電生理與起搏學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文匯編[C];2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 張鵬;額面P波電軸與慢性阻塞性肺疾病相關(guān)性研究[D];新疆醫(yī)科大學(xué);2017年

2 王建;特發(fā)性左室室性心動(dòng)過(guò)速經(jīng)導(dǎo)管消融中室速電軸改變的電生理機(jī)制[D];大連醫(yī)科大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：2421139