【摘要】：目的:評價動脈序貫介入治療(髂內(nèi)動脈置管+封堵/子宮動脈或髂內(nèi)動脈栓塞)對兇險型前置胎盤(PPP)出血的治療效果。方法:選取在我院診治的有胎盤植入高危因素的69例PPP患者,其中29例給予傳統(tǒng)的治療方法(對照組),40例給予動脈序貫介入治療(觀察組)。比較分析兩組患者的術(shù)中出血量、輸紅懸量、子宮切除率、剖宮產(chǎn)手術(shù)時間、剖宮產(chǎn)術(shù)后24h出血量、術(shù)后住院時間、術(shù)后抗生素使用時間及并發(fā)癥(疼痛、發(fā)熱、感染及其它并發(fā)癥)發(fā)生率。結(jié)果:觀察組與對照組的術(shù)中出血量[(868.5±549.77)ml vs(1506.90±1417.39)ml]、輸紅懸量[(1.50±1.40)U vs(2.72±2.00)U]、子宮切除率(2.50%vs 17.24%)、剖宮產(chǎn)手術(shù)時間[(58.86±20.33)min vs(70.83±29.26)min]、術(shù)后疼痛發(fā)生率(81.25%vs 48.28%)、其它并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率(0.00%vs 10.35%)比較,差異均有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05)。兩組的剖宮產(chǎn)術(shù)后24h出血量、術(shù)后住院時間、術(shù)后抗生素使用時間、疼痛VAS評分、術(shù)后發(fā)熱發(fā)生率、術(shù)后感染發(fā)生率比較,差異均無統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05)。兩組產(chǎn)婦(子宮切除者除外)均于停止哺乳后1~3月月經(jīng)恢復(fù)情況正常;42天常規(guī)新生兒體檢,血象、肝功能及神經(jīng)系統(tǒng)檢查無明顯異常、新生兒均無血液系統(tǒng)疾病。結(jié)論:動脈序貫介入治療PPP有效、可行,且對母嬰安全。
[Abstract]:Objective: to evaluate the efficacy of sequential arterial interventional therapy (internal iliac artery closure / uterine artery or internal iliac artery embolization) in the treatment of severe placenta previa (PPP) hemorrhage. Methods: 69 PPP patients with high risk factors of placenta implantation were selected, 29 of them were treated with traditional treatment (control group) and 40 with sequential arterial intervention (observation group). The amount of intraoperative bleeding, the amount of red suspension, the rate of hysterectomy, the time of cesarean section, the amount of blood lost 24 hours after cesarean section, the time of hospitalization, the time of using antibiotics and complications (pain, fever) were compared and analyzed. Incidence of infection and other complications. Results: the intraoperative bleeding volume [(868.5 鹵549.77) ml vs (1506.90 鹵1417.39) ml], red suspension volume [(1.50 鹵1.40) U vs (2.72 鹵2.00) U] and hysterectomy rate (2.50%vs 17.24%) were observed in the observation group and the control group. The duration of cesarean section [(58.86 鹵20.33) min vs (70.83 鹵29.26) min], the incidence of postoperative pain (81.25%vs 48.28%) and other complications (0.00%vs 10.35%) were compared. The difference was statistically significant (P0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the amount of bleeding 24 hours after cesarean section, postoperative hospitalization time, postoperative antibiotic use time, pain VAS score, postoperative fever rate and postoperative infection rate (P0.05). The recovery of menstruation in both groups (except hysterectomy) was normal from 1 to 3 months after the termination of lactation, and there was no obvious abnormality in routine neonatal physical examination, blood picture, liver function and nervous system examination, and there was no hematological disease in the newborns. Conclusion: sequential arterial intervention for PPP is effective, feasible and safe for mother and child.
【作者單位】： 成都市婦女兒童中心醫(yī)院產(chǎn)科;成都市婦女兒童中心醫(yī)院放射科;
【基金】：成都市衛(wèi)生局課題(No:2014061) 國家科技支撐計劃課題(No:2014BAI05B00) 妊娠合并危急重癥救治技術(shù)及防控模式研究(No:2014BAI05B05)
【分類號】：R714.5

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 路思思;鄒麗;;兇險性前置胎盤致產(chǎn)后大出血的防范[J];中國實用婦科與產(chǎn)科雜志;2014年04期

2 侯倩男;常林利;周輝;;兇險型前置胎盤中胎盤主體附著位置對母體預(yù)后的影響[J];中華婦幼臨床醫(yī)學雜志(電子版);2014年01期

3 嚴小麗;陳誠;常青;王琳;閻萍;;兇險性前置胎盤20例臨床分析[J];實用婦產(chǎn)科雜志;2013年09期

4 朱乃芬;;6例植入性兇險型前置胎盤產(chǎn)婦行股動脈預(yù)置管栓塞術(shù)的護理[J];中華護理雜志;2012年09期

5 欒雪峰;;前置胎盤剖宮產(chǎn)術(shù)前子宮動脈置管術(shù)中行栓塞術(shù)在防治產(chǎn)后出血中的應(yīng)用[J];中國婦幼保健;2010年27期

6 杜蓮芳;黃芳;陳婉;;前置胎盤的病因與防治[J];中國婦幼保健;2010年11期

7 劉洪慶;;難治性產(chǎn)后出血介入治療的應(yīng)用進展[J];當代醫(yī)學;2010年05期

8 周胤健;;兇險型前置胎盤22例臨床分析[J];浙江醫(yī)學;2008年12期

9 司少臣;;急診動脈栓塞治療產(chǎn)后大出血的臨床療效觀察[J];當代醫(yī)學(中國介入放射學);2008年04期

10 李東紅;楊愛君;李秀萍;王會茹;張琰;;剖宮產(chǎn)術(shù)后妊娠合并前置胎盤并穿透性胎盤2例[J];實用婦產(chǎn)科雜志;2007年09期

【共引文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 魏菲;林玨瑛;周瑞仁;陳琪瑛;羅翠珍;楊金玲;;改良式髂總動脈球囊閉塞術(shù)在控制兇險型前置胎盤剖宮產(chǎn)術(shù)中出血的臨床研究[J];微創(chuàng)醫(yī)學;2016年04期

2 王利民;侯倩男;羅丹;劉丹丹;劉星濤;唐冬梅;周輝;高嵐;;動脈栓塞鑲嵌式治療兇險型前置胎盤產(chǎn)后出血的臨床研究[J];西部醫(yī)學;2016年08期

3 胥琳t，

本文編號：2325015