【摘要】：目的:探討兒童MPP中T細胞亞群、HMGB1的表達;探討復(fù)方甘草酸苷對T細胞亞群、HMGB1的調(diào)控作用;觀察復(fù)方甘草酸苷對MPP的療效及副作用。方法:本研究選取2015年1月至2016年12月在吉林大學(xué)第一醫(yī)院小兒呼吸二科住院就診的60例符合MPP診斷的患者,按其治療藥物分為對照組、復(fù)方甘草酸苷組、激素組3個組,按照入院順序隨機分配進入3個組,每組為20人,所有患者均給予退熱、止咳化痰及霧化對癥治療,對照組加用阿奇霉素;復(fù)方甘草酸苷組在對照組基礎(chǔ)上加用復(fù)方甘草酸苷;激素組在對照組基礎(chǔ)上加用甲潑尼龍琥珀酸鈉,總療程均為10天。同時選取我院56例健康兒童作為空白組。流式細胞儀檢測T細胞亞群,ELISA法檢測HMGB1含量,觀察患兒5天內(nèi)發(fā)熱、呼吸急促、鼻翼煽動、口周發(fā)紺等癥狀及肺部Up音情況,比較治療后的臨床有效率及副作用。運用SPSS Statistics21.0統(tǒng)計軟件行統(tǒng)計學(xué)分析。結(jié)果:1.MPP組與空白組相比,MPP組急性期CD4+降低,CD8+升高,CD4+/CD8+降低,P0.05,兩組差異明顯。2.復(fù)方甘草酸苷組和激素組治療后,CD4+升高,CD8+降低,CD4+/CD8+升高,P0.05,差異顯著,但復(fù)方甘草酸苷組治療后CD4+/CD8+接近正常兒童水平。3.MPP組與空白組相比,MPP急性期HMGB1升高,P0.05,兩組比較有差異;治療后,HMGB1降低,P0.05,差異明顯,但仍高于空白組。4.復(fù)方甘草酸苷組和激素組治療后HMGB1水平與對照組相比明顯降低,P0.05,差異明顯;但復(fù)方甘草酸苷組與激素組比較,P0.05,差異不顯著。5.臨床療效比較:兩治療組有效率明顯高于對照組,P0.05,差異顯著;但復(fù)方甘草酸苷組與激素組比較,P0.05,差異不明顯。復(fù)方甘草酸苷組(0)副作用明顯低于激素組(20%),P0.05,兩組差異明顯。結(jié)論:1.兒童MPP急性期CD4+降低,CD8+升高,CD4+/CD8+降低,提示T細胞亞群紊亂參與了MPP的發(fā)病。2.復(fù)方甘草酸苷治療后CD4+、CD4+/CD8+細胞水平升高,CD8+細胞水平降低,且CD4+/CD8+細胞水平接近正常兒童,說明復(fù)方甘草酸苷對T細亞群的紊亂有糾正作用。3.MPP急性期HMGB1升高,治療后降低,但仍高于正常兒童,說明HMGB1可以作為反應(yīng)疾病急性期的炎癥因子,且持續(xù)存在時間長,可以作為晚期炎癥因子預(yù)測病情變化。4.復(fù)方甘草酸苷治療后HMGB1下降程度與激素組相當(dāng),明顯高于對照組,說明甘草酸苷可以作為HMGB1抑制劑在兒童MPP中應(yīng)用。5.在兒童MPP中,復(fù)方甘草酸苷的臨床有效率與激素相近,但無食欲增強、體重增長等副作用。
[Abstract]:Aim: to investigate the expression of T cell subsets and HMGB1 in children with MPP, to investigate the regulatory effects of compound glycyrrhizin on T cell subsets and HMGB1, and to observe the efficacy and side effects of compound glycyrrhizin on MPP. Methods: from January 2015 to December 2016, 60 patients who were hospitalized in Department of Pediatric Respiratory, first Hospital of Jilin University were selected and divided into control group, compound glycyrrhizin group and hormone group. According to the order of admission, the patients were randomly assigned into three groups, 20 persons in each group. All the patients were given antipyretic, cough, phlegm and atomization treatment, while the control group was treated with azithromycin. Compound glycyrrhizin was added to the control group and methylprednisolone sodium succinate was added to the control group for 10 days. At the same time, 56 healthy children in our hospital were selected as blank group. T-cell subsets were detected by flow cytometry, HMGB1 content was detected by ELISA method, and symptoms such as fever, shortness of breath, nasal wing incitement, perioral cyanosis and pulmonary Up sound were observed within 5 days after treatment. The clinical efficacy and side effects were compared. SPSS Statistics21.0 statistical software was used for statistical analysis. Results: compared with the control group, the CD4, CD8 and CD4 / CD8 in 1.MPP group were decreased, and the ratio of CD4 / CD8 was decreased in MPP group in acute phase (P 0.05), the difference between the two groups was significant (2. 2). After treatment with compound glycyrrhizin group and hormone group, CD4 increased, CD8 decreased, CD4 / CD8 increased and P0.05, but CD4 / CD8 in compound glycyrrhizin group was close to normal children after treatment. Compared with control group, CD4 / CD8 in 3.MPP group was higher than that in blank group. The level of HMGB1 in the acute phase of MPP was higher than that in the control group (P0.05), and there was a difference between the two groups. After treatment, HMGB1 decreased, P 0.05, the difference was significant, but still higher than the blank group. 4. 4. The level of HMGB1 in compound glycyrrhizin group and hormone group was significantly lower than that in control group (P 0.05), but the difference was not significant between compound glycyrrhizin group and hormone group (P 0.05). Comparison of clinical efficacy: the effective rate of the two treatment groups was significantly higher than that of the control group (P0.05), but the difference between the compound glycyrrhizin group and the hormone group was not significant (P0.05). The side effect of compound glycyrrhizin group (0) was significantly lower than that of hormone group (20%), and the difference between the two groups was significant (P 0.05). Conclusion: 1. In children with acute MPP, CD4 decreased, CD8 increased, and CD4 / CD8 decreased, suggesting that T cell subsets disorder was involved in MPP. 2. 2. After treatment with compound glycyrrhizin, CD4 / CD8 cell level increased, CD8 cell level decreased, and CD4 / CD8 cell level was close to that of normal children, which indicated that compound glycyrrhizin could correct the disorder of T subgroup. HMGB1 increased in acute 3.MPP stage. The results showed that HMGB1 could be used as inflammatory factor in acute stage of reaction disease, and it lasted for a long time, and it could be used as a late inflammatory factor to predict the change of disease. 4. The decrease of HMGB1 in the compound glycyrrhizin group was similar to that in the hormone group, which was significantly higher than that in the control group, indicating that glycyrrhizin could be used as a HMGB1 inhibitor in children with MPP. In children with MPP, the clinical effective rate of compound glycyrrhizin was similar to that of hormone, but had no side effects such as increased appetite and weight gain.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：R725.6

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李世波;智日增;;復(fù)方甘草酸苷治療病毒性肝炎高膽紅素血癥療效觀察[J];浙江臨床醫(yī)學(xué);2007年02期

2 吳赤紅,徐小元,陸海英,藺小紅,侯鳳琴,于巖巖,王廣發(fā),聶立功;復(fù)方甘草酸苷治療傳染性非典型肺炎患者胸部X線表現(xiàn)分析[J];中國藥房;2004年01期

3 任書青,楊樹民,沈鴻濱;復(fù)方甘草酸苷的臨床新用途[J];臨床薈萃;2005年14期

4 張龍琪,陶志梅,童照威,施柏年;復(fù)方甘草酸苷治療妊娠期病毒性肝炎的療效觀察[J];杭州師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(自然科學(xué)版);2005年03期

5 王忠全,丁卓玲;復(fù)方甘草酸苷的臨床應(yīng)用[J];中國藥房;2005年20期

6 陸燕萍;林琦;;復(fù)方甘草酸苷治療慢性乙型病毒性肝炎49例[J];浙江中西醫(yī)結(jié)合雜志;2006年05期

7 迪力達爾;沙依努爾;阿色葉木;;復(fù)方甘草酸苷治療急性黃疸型病毒性肝炎32例[J];現(xiàn)代醫(yī)藥衛(wèi)生;2006年13期

8 張勤;陳倫灼;;復(fù)方甘草酸苷臨床應(yīng)用進展[J];海峽藥學(xué);2006年04期

9 康玉英;周敏;賀蕾;;復(fù)方甘草酸苷治療面部激素依賴性皮炎療效觀察[J];山西醫(yī)藥雜志;2006年10期

10 陳少君;宋艷麗;姚春海;劉青云;李云峰;郎娜;;復(fù)方甘草酸苷聯(lián)合中藥治療面部激素依賴性皮炎臨床分析[J];中國麻風(fēng)皮膚病雜志;2006年12期

相關(guān)會議論文 前10條

1 古元清;;藍科膚寧聯(lián)合復(fù)方甘草酸苷治療面部激素依賴性皮炎療效觀察[A];2011全國中西醫(yī)結(jié)合皮膚性病學(xué)術(shù)會議論文匯編[C];2011年

2 杜迎;鹿智慧;劉勇;孫苗;;紅藍光聯(lián)合復(fù)方甘草酸苷膠囊治療面部激素依賴性皮炎療效觀察[A];2014全國中西醫(yī)結(jié)合皮膚性病學(xué)術(shù)年會論文匯編[C];2014年

3 王安利;李月梅;;復(fù)方青黛膠囊聯(lián)合復(fù)方甘草酸苷治療玫瑰糖疹療效觀察[A];中華醫(yī)學(xué)會第十八次全國皮膚性病學(xué)術(shù)年會論文匯編[C];2012年

4 李世波;智日增;;復(fù)方甘草酸苷治療病毒性高膽紅素血癥療效觀察[A];第五屆全國肝臟疾病臨床暨中華肝臟病雜志成立十周年學(xué)術(shù)會議論文匯編[C];2006年

5 李霽虹;趙昭性;冀霞;;復(fù)方甘草酸苷對慢性乙型肝炎肝纖維化指標(biāo)的影響[A];中華醫(yī)學(xué)會第十二次全國病毒性肝炎及肝病學(xué)術(shù)會議論文匯編[C];2005年

6 白露;;復(fù)方甘草酸苷不良反應(yīng)[A];2010年度全國醫(yī)藥學(xué)術(shù)論文交流會暨臨床藥學(xué)與藥學(xué)服務(wù)研究進展培訓(xùn)班論文集[C];2010年

7 雷雨;陸海英;徐小元;;復(fù)方甘草酸苷治療慢性乙型肝炎的臨床研究[A];中華醫(yī)學(xué)會第十二次全國病毒性肝炎及肝病學(xué)術(shù)會議論文匯編[C];2005年

8 楊顏龍;姜功平;;復(fù)方甘草酸苷聯(lián)合復(fù)方辣椒酊地塞米松搽劑治療斑禿52例療效觀察[A];2009全國中西醫(yī)結(jié)合皮膚性病學(xué)術(shù)會議論文匯編[C];2009年

9 劉越陽;郭春芳;李靈勻;王強;李鐵男;;復(fù)方甘草酸苷治療金葡菌性燙傷樣皮膚綜合征臨床療效觀察[A];2009全國中西醫(yī)結(jié)合皮膚性病學(xué)術(shù)會議論文匯編[C];2009年

10 許爾屹;王東偉;張晨瑤;;復(fù)方甘草酸苷(美能)治療化療藥物性肝臟損害臨床觀察[A];中華醫(yī)學(xué)會第十二次全國病毒性肝炎及肝病學(xué)術(shù)會議論文匯編[C];2005年

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前5條

1 姚文虎 趙偉 吳引偉 趙紅 魏洪霞 成驄 南京市第二醫(yī)院;復(fù)方甘草酸苷輔助治療艾滋病臨床研究[N];中國中醫(yī)藥報;2006年

2 付德明;復(fù)方甘草酸苷治慢性乙肝安全有效[N];中國醫(yī)藥報;2004年

3 嵇旭東　魏林玲;復(fù)方甘草酸苷輔治艾滋病有效[N];大眾衛(wèi)生報;2007年

4 姚趙吳 趙魏成;復(fù)方甘草酸苷對艾滋病患者有免疫支持作用[N];中國醫(yī)藥報;2006年

5 嵇旭東 魏林玲;復(fù)方甘草酸苷可輔助治療艾滋病[N];健康報;2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條

1 蘭向陽;復(fù)方甘草酸苷對潰瘍性結(jié)腸炎大鼠Toll樣受體介導(dǎo)的NF-κB信號通路的影響[D];湖北中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2015年

2 楊成林;NB-UVB、礦泉水浴、復(fù)方甘草酸苷膠囊口服治療尋常型銀屑病的療效觀察[D];青島大學(xué);2015年

3 李婷婷;復(fù)方甘草酸苷對兒童肺炎支原體肺炎T細胞亞群及HMGB1表達的影響[D];吉林大學(xué);2017年

4 劉娟娟;復(fù)方甘草酸苷對過敏性紫癜患兒外周血T輔助細胞功能影響[D];青島大學(xué);2014年

5 蘇江;復(fù)方甘草酸苷對膠原誘導(dǎo)性關(guān)節(jié)炎大鼠血清TNF-α、IL-1β的影響[D];昆明醫(yī)學(xué)院;2006年

6 李啟杰;復(fù)方甘草酸苷誘導(dǎo)抗病毒分子及免疫調(diào)節(jié)機制的體外研究[D];成都中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2013年

7 肖靜;復(fù)方甘草酸苷對過敏性紫癜患兒Treg細胞/Th17細胞功能的影響[D];青島大學(xué);2014年

8 周明偉;復(fù)方甘草酸苷治療白癜風(fēng)的實驗研究及臨床觀察[D];吉林大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號：2341276