本文選題：初中生 + 父母教養(yǎng)方式��； 參考：《浙江大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：研究目的通過(guò)對(duì)寧波市鄞州區(qū)初中生的調(diào)查,研究父母教養(yǎng)方式、應(yīng)對(duì)方式和初中生焦慮的現(xiàn)況以及他們之間的相互關(guān)系,從而為教育部門(mén)開(kāi)展初中生心理健康教育提供支持。研究方法采用分層隨機(jī)抽樣,在鄞州區(qū)城區(qū)、城鄉(xiāng)結(jié)合區(qū)、郊區(qū)分別抽取2所,共計(jì)6所。在每所學(xué)校的初一、初二、初三每個(gè)年級(jí)段各隨機(jī)抽取2個(gè)班級(jí)作為調(diào)查班級(jí)。共計(jì)調(diào)查36個(gè)班級(jí),1022名學(xué)生。采用父母教養(yǎng)方式量表、中學(xué)生應(yīng)對(duì)方式量表、兒童焦慮性情緒障礙篩查表進(jìn)行調(diào)查,使用SPSS19.0進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)檢驗(yàn)和中介分析。研究結(jié)果1、初中生家庭教養(yǎng)方式中,父親和母親的情感溫暖理解因子分(46.58±11.31,52.56±11.16)均低于常模。父親和母親,對(duì)女兒的情感溫暖理解因子分(47.94±11.27,54.12±11.03)明顯高于對(duì)兒子(45.04±11.17,50.80±11.05)(p0.01)。父親對(duì)兒子的懲罰/嚴(yán)厲因子分(19.71±6.73)明顯高于女兒(17.17±5.08)(p0.01)。父親對(duì)兒子的過(guò)分干涉因子分(10.72±4.64)和母親對(duì)兒子的過(guò)分干涉過(guò)分保護(hù)因子分(24.61±6.88)明顯高于女兒(9.18±4.41,24.61±6.88)(p0.05)。母親對(duì)兒子的懲罰/嚴(yán)厲因子分(13.62±4.60)高于對(duì)女兒的(12.12士3.74)(p0.05)。(?)2、中學(xué)生傾向于使用的應(yīng)對(duì)方式依次為:問(wèn)題解決或發(fā)泄情緒(70.45%)、尋求支持(72.8%)、忍耐(69.67%)、逃避(63.21%)、幻想/否認(rèn)(44.62%)、合理解釋(22.50%)。男生問(wèn)題解決因子分、尋求支持因子分(19.64±3.51、17.84±3.46),低于女生(20.78±2.89,19.08±3.20)(p0.01)。男生逃避因子分(7.89±2.03),高于女生(7.27±1.78)(p0.01)。3、男生焦慮總分(20.45±13.43)、女生的焦慮總分(22.40±11.86),均高于常模。軀體化/驚恐總分(4.39±4.13)、廣泛性焦慮總分(6.02±3.60)、分離性焦慮總分(4.51±2.95)、社交恐怖總分(3.33±1.93)、學(xué)�？植揽偡�(1..24±1.56)均高于常模。女生在分離性焦慮(4.76±2.93)、社交恐怖(3.45±1.94)2個(gè)因子上得分高于男生(3.95±2.95,3.06±1.89)。焦慮障礙檢出率20.8%,其中女生焦慮障礙檢出率(22.9%)和男性(18.5%)無(wú)差異(χ2=2.90,p0.05)。4、忍耐、逃避、發(fā)泄情緒、幻想/否認(rèn)因子在焦慮組得分較高(p0.001)。5、與應(yīng)對(duì)方式中問(wèn)題解決正相關(guān)的為父親、母親情感溫暖/理解,負(fù)相關(guān)的為父親、母親懲罰/嚴(yán)厲。與尋求社會(huì)支持正相關(guān)的為焦慮總分,父親、母親情感溫暖/理解。與合理解釋正相關(guān)的為父親、母親情感溫暖/理解,負(fù)相關(guān)的為母親懲罰/嚴(yán)厲。與忍耐正相關(guān)的為焦慮總分,父親、母親懲罰/嚴(yán)厲,拒絕/否認(rèn),父親過(guò)度保護(hù),母親過(guò)分干涉保護(hù)。與逃避正相關(guān)的為焦慮總分,父親、母親懲罰/嚴(yán)厲、拒絕/否認(rèn),父親過(guò)分干涉,母親過(guò)分干涉保護(hù),負(fù)相關(guān)的是父親情感溫暖/理解。與發(fā)泄情緒正相關(guān)的為焦慮總分,父親、母親懲罰/嚴(yán)厲、拒絕/否認(rèn),父親過(guò)度保護(hù)。與幻想/否認(rèn)正相關(guān)的為焦慮總分,父親、母親懲罰/嚴(yán)厲、拒絕/否認(rèn),父親過(guò)度保護(hù)、過(guò)度干涉,母親過(guò)分干涉保護(hù),負(fù)相關(guān)的是母親情感溫暖/理解。6、父親、母親情感溫暖/理解,對(duì)子女應(yīng)對(duì)方式中問(wèn)題解決、尋求支持、合理解釋維度有預(yù)測(cè)作用。父親、母親拒絕/否認(rèn),對(duì)子女應(yīng)對(duì)方式中忍耐、逃避、發(fā)泄、幻想/否認(rèn)有預(yù)測(cè)作用。7、逃避是父、母溫暖/理解和焦慮之間的中介因素;幻想/否認(rèn)是父親溫暖/理解和焦慮之間的中介因素。忍耐,逃避,發(fā)泄情緒,幻想/否認(rèn)是父、母懲罰/嚴(yán)厲,拒絕/否認(rèn)和焦慮之間的中介因素。逃避,幻想/否認(rèn)是父、母過(guò)分干涉和焦慮之間的中介因素。忍耐,發(fā)泄情緒是母親和焦慮之間的中介因素。發(fā)泄情緒,幻想/否認(rèn)是父親過(guò)度保護(hù)和焦慮之間的中介因素。研究結(jié)論1、初中生家庭教養(yǎng)方式中,家庭對(duì)子女不夠溫暖、理解。而家庭里無(wú)論父親還是母親,對(duì)女孩更溫暖,而對(duì)男孩更加嚴(yán)厲。父親更容易對(duì)男孩拒絕否認(rèn),父親對(duì)男孩的過(guò)度保護(hù)高于女孩。父母應(yīng)該對(duì)子女采取情感溫暖、理解度高的教養(yǎng)方式。2、初中生最常采用的是問(wèn)題解決的應(yīng)對(duì)方式。初中生在面對(duì)壓力的時(shí)候傾向于使用:問(wèn)題解決、發(fā)泄情緒、尋求支持、忍耐、逃避。不同性別的初中生在問(wèn)題解決、尋求支持、忍耐、逃避這幾個(gè)方面存在顯著差異。在面對(duì)壓力的時(shí)候,中學(xué)男生更傾向于采用"情緒應(yīng)對(duì)",而女生更傾向于采用"問(wèn)題應(yīng)對(duì)"。3、男、女生的焦慮障礙檢出率較高,五個(gè)分量表均高于常模,調(diào)查對(duì)象的焦慮障礙應(yīng)該引起重視。4、通過(guò)家庭教養(yǎng)方式,應(yīng)對(duì)方式,焦慮三者之間的分析發(fā)現(xiàn)。首先,父母教養(yǎng)方式不同會(huì)影響應(yīng)對(duì)方式的選擇。其次,父母教養(yǎng)方式不同會(huì)影響子女的焦慮狀態(tài),子女的應(yīng)對(duì)方式不同也會(huì)影響其焦慮。最后,在父母教養(yǎng)方式和焦慮中起中介作用的,主要是指向情緒的應(yīng)對(duì)方式。5、初中生家庭中可能存在FEAR效應(yīng)(家庭增強(qiáng)的回避反應(yīng)效應(yīng))。
[Abstract]:The purpose of the study is to study the mode of parenting, the coping style and the anxiety of the junior high school students and the relationship between them, and the relationship between them, and the relationship between them, and to provide support for the education department to carry out the middle school students' psychological health education. The research methods are stratified random sampling, in the urban area of Yinzhou District, the urban and rural area, the suburb. In each school, 2 classes were randomly selected as investigation classes at the first, second and third grade of each school. A total of 36 classes and 1022 students were surveyed in each school. A total of 36 classes and 1022 students were investigated. The questionnaire of parents' parenting style, the questionnaire of coping style of middle school students, the screening table for anxiety disorder of children and the use of SPSS19.0 were used. Study results and mediator analysis. Results 1, the emotional warmth comprehension factor (46.58 + 11.31,52.56 + 11.16) of the father and mother was lower than that of the norm. Father and mother, the emotional warmth understanding factor (47.94 + 11.27,54.12 + 11.03) to the daughter (45.04 + 11.17,50.80 + 11.03) was significantly higher than that of the son (45.04 + 11.17,50.80 + 11.05) (P0.01). The father's punishment / severe factor (19.71 + 6.73) was significantly higher than that of the daughter (17.17 + 5.08) (P0.01). The excessive interference factor (10.72 + 4.64) of the father to his son (10.72 + 4.64) and the excessive protection factor (24.61 + 6.88) of the mother to his son (24.61 + 6.88) were significantly higher than that of the daughter (9.18 + 4.41,24.61 + 6.88) (P0.05). The punishment / severity factor of the mother to the son The score (13.62 + 4.60) was higher than that of (12.12. 3.74) (P0.05). (?) 2. The coping styles of middle school students were: problem solving or venting emotion (70.45%), seeking support (72.8%), patience (69.67%), escape (63.21%), fantasy / denial (44.62%), rational explanation (22.50%). Boys' problem solving factor score and seeking support factor score (19.64 + 3.5). 1,17.84 + 3.46) was lower than that of girls (20.78 + 2.89,19.08 + 3.20) (P0.01). The boys' escape factor scores (7.89 + 2.03), higher than girls (7.27 + 1.78) (P0.01).3, boys' total anxiety score (20.45 + 13.43), and girls' total anxiety score (22.40 + 11.86) were higher than normal models. The total score of somatization / panic (4.39 + 4.13), general anxiety total score (6.02 + 2.03), separation anxiety Total score (4.51 + 2.95), total score of social terror (3.33 + 1.93), the total score of school terror (1..24 + 1.56) were higher than that of normal model. The scores of female students were higher than that of boys (4.76 + 2.93), and 2 factors of social terror (3.45 + 1.94) were higher than that of boys (3.95 + 2.95,3.06 + 1.89). Difference (chi 2=2.90, P0.05).4, patience, escape, vent mood, fantasy / denial factor in the anxiety group score higher (p0.001).5, and the coping style of the problem is positively related to the father, the mother's emotional warmth / understanding, negative related to the father, the mother is punished / severe. Warm / understanding. It is the father, mother's emotional warmth / understanding, the mother's emotional warmth / understanding, the negative correlation for mother's punishment / severity. The positive correlation with patience is a total of anxiety. Father, mother punishment / severity, refusal / denial, father overprotective, mother excessively interfering protection. Absolute / denial, father excessively interfered, mother excessively interfered with protection, negatively related to father's emotional warmth / understanding. The general score of anxiety was associated with venting emotions, father, mother punishment / severity, refusal / denial, father overprotection. The total score of anxiety related to fantasy / denial, father, mother punishment / severity, refusal / denial, father overinsured. The mother's emotional warmth / understanding of.6, father, mother's emotional warmth / understanding, the mother's emotional warmth / understanding, the prediction of the problem solving, the support and the rational explanation of the child's coping style. Father, mother refuses / deny, and the mother's coping style is patient, escaping, venting, fantasy / denial. Using.7, escaping is the intermediary between father, mother's warmth / understanding and anxiety; Fantasy / denial is the intermediary between father's warmth / understanding and anxiety. Patience, evasion, venting emotion, fantasy / denial are the mediators between father, mother's punishment / severity, refusal / denial and anxiety. Escape, fantasy / denial are between father, mother excessively interference and anxiety. Mediating factors. Patience and vent emotion are intermediary factors between mother and anxiety. Venting emotion, fantasy / denial are intermediary factors between father's excessive protection and anxiety. Research conclusions 1, middle school students are not warm enough to their children in the way of family upbringing. Children are more severe. Fathers are more likely to refuse to deny boys, father's over protection of boys is higher than girls. Parents should take emotional warmth and understanding to their children,.2, junior middle school students most often use problem solving methods. Junior high school students tend to use problems when facing pressure: problem solving, vent emotion, search. In the face of pressure, middle school boys are more inclined to adopt "emotional coping", while girls tend to adopt "problem coping".3, male and female students have higher detection rate of anxiety disorder, and five subscales are all Higher than the norm, the anxiety disorder of the respondents should pay attention to.4, through the analysis of the three aspects of family upbringing, coping style and anxiety. First, the difference of parental rearing patterns will affect the choice of coping styles. Secondly, the difference of parental rearing patterns will affect the anxiety state of the children, and the different coping styles of the children will also affect them. Finally, the mediating role of the parental rearing patterns and anxiety is mainly directed towards the coping style of the mood.5, and the FEAR effect may exist in the families of junior high school students (family enhanced avoidance response effect).
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：G78;R749.72

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 關(guān)彩萍,趙桂金,劉玉蘭,高改仙,王芳芳;高中生父母教養(yǎng)方式研究比較[J];中國(guó)公共衛(wèi)生;2001年07期

2 李靜,崔春華,吳丹偉;城鄉(xiāng)父母教養(yǎng)方式對(duì)青少年個(gè)性的影響[J];中國(guó)行為醫(yī)學(xué)科學(xué);2005年07期

3 陸碧梅;謝巧慶;梁海華;黃敏英;陳靜蓉;;父母教養(yǎng)方式干預(yù)對(duì)多動(dòng)癥兒童的影響[J];現(xiàn)代臨床護(hù)理;2006年05期

4 張繼華;;學(xué)齡前兒童父母教養(yǎng)方式的調(diào)查[J];公共衛(wèi)生與預(yù)防醫(yī)學(xué);2006年05期

5 尹文娟;荊承紅;施建農(nóng);;中專(zhuān)生和高中生父母教養(yǎng)方式的比較研究[J];中國(guó)健康心理學(xué)雜志;2007年08期

6 王麗;李建明;李麗娜;;監(jiān)獄犯人早年父母教養(yǎng)方式的調(diào)查研究[J];中國(guó)健康心理學(xué)雜志;2008年05期

7 王麗;李建明;李麗娜;;監(jiān)獄犯人早年父母教養(yǎng)方式的調(diào)查研究[J];中國(guó)健康心理學(xué)雜志;2008年06期

8 王新友;李恒芬;肖偉霞;;父母教養(yǎng)方式對(duì)青少年網(wǎng)絡(luò)成癮的影響[J];中國(guó)健康心理學(xué)雜志;2009年06期

9 李麗英;李淑環(huán);;醫(yī)學(xué)高職生的生活滿(mǎn)意度與自尊、父母教養(yǎng)方式的關(guān)系[J];醫(yī)學(xué)研究與教育;2009年03期

10 徐艷麗;高志華;李建明;;大學(xué)生父母教養(yǎng)方式與成人依戀的關(guān)系研究[J];中國(guó)健康心理學(xué)雜志;2009年10期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 楊靜;韋磐石;;小學(xué)生拖延行為與父母教養(yǎng)方式的相關(guān)研究[A];增強(qiáng)心理學(xué)服務(wù)社會(huì)的意識(shí)和功能——中國(guó)心理學(xué)會(huì)成立90周年紀(jì)念大會(huì)暨第十四屆全國(guó)心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文摘要集[C];2011年

2 孫華平;程學(xué)超;張萌;;電視暴力、父母教養(yǎng)方式與兒童攻擊性關(guān)系的研究[A];第九屆全國(guó)心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議文摘選集[C];2001年

3 楊小平;周霞;路金聲;;重點(diǎn)高中學(xué)生心理健康狀況與父母教養(yǎng)方式的關(guān)系[A];中國(guó)心理衛(wèi)生協(xié)會(huì)第四屆學(xué)術(shù)大會(huì)論文匯編[C];2003年

4 李志楠;鄒曉燕;;8～16歲兒童行為自主與父母教養(yǎng)方式的相關(guān)研究[A];第十屆全國(guó)心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)大會(huì)論文摘要集[C];2005年

5 王春莉;廖鳳林;;父母教養(yǎng)方式與高中生抑郁情緒的相關(guān)研究[A];第十屆全國(guó)心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)大會(huì)論文摘要集[C];2005年

6 李小靜;;父母教養(yǎng)方式對(duì)青少年焦慮癥的影響[A];精神科護(hù)理新進(jìn)展培訓(xùn)班及學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2008年

7 盛明明;;大學(xué)生父母教養(yǎng)方式、自我和諧與孤獨(dú)感關(guān)系分析[A];第十五屆全國(guó)心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文摘要集[C];2012年

8 汪小琴;許愛(ài)珠;張建燦;汪小霞;;農(nóng)村貧困女童人格與父母教養(yǎng)方式的相關(guān)研究[A];第七屆全國(guó)心理衛(wèi)生學(xué)術(shù)大會(huì)論文匯編[C];2014年

9 吳超;杜凌陽(yáng);傅正闖;;社交恐懼癥患者的16PF測(cè)試及父母教養(yǎng)方式調(diào)查分析[A];2009年浙江省醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)精神病學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)暨浙江省醫(yī)師協(xié)會(huì)精神科醫(yī)師分會(huì)第二屆年會(huì)論文匯編[C];2009年

10 潘玉進(jìn);金笑笑;楊青影;;父母教養(yǎng)方式與小學(xué)中高年級(jí)學(xué)生孤獨(dú)感的調(diào)查研究[A];第十屆全國(guó)心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)大會(huì)論文摘要集[C];2005年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 劉文;論兒童氣質(zhì)與父母教養(yǎng)方式的相互作用[N];中國(guó)教育資訊報(bào);2002年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 俞蓉蓉;反社會(huì)型人格特質(zhì)的結(jié)構(gòu)及其與父母教養(yǎng)方式的關(guān)系[D];浙江大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 易靜;父母教養(yǎng)方式與青少年寬恕傾向的關(guān)系研究[D];四川師范大學(xué);2012年

2 韓玉蓮;父母教養(yǎng)方式與兒童在同伴交往中受歡迎性的關(guān)系研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2015年

3 周U，

本文編號(hào)：2067034