【摘要】：目的比較健康調(diào)查簡表(SF-36量表)與世界衛(wèi)生組織生存質(zhì)量測定量表簡表(WHOQOL-Bref量表)在評估肺結(jié)核患者生存質(zhì)量方面的實(shí)用性。方法 2013年7月-9月期間共納入符合標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的肺結(jié)核患者201例,分別采用SF-36量表與WHOQOL-Bref量表對患者進(jìn)行問卷調(diào)查,并運(yùn)用可靠性分析、因子分析、Pearson相關(guān)性分析等統(tǒng)計學(xué)方法比較兩個量表的信度、效度及兩個量表的內(nèi)在相關(guān)性。結(jié)果共收回有效問卷195份。SF-36量表與WHOQOL-Bref量表Cronbachα系數(shù)分別為0.920、0.863,SF-36量表的Cronbachα系數(shù)較WHOQOLBref量表的稍高;通過因子分析,兩個量表中的所有問題條目都能被很好地歸納入相應(yīng)的因子中;SF-36量表和WHOQOL-Bref量表類似維度之間具有較高的相關(guān)系數(shù)r值,且P0.05。結(jié)論兩個量表均具有良好的信度和效度,均能較全面地評價肺結(jié)核患者的生存質(zhì)量,即SF-36量表和WHOQOL-Bref量表在評價肺結(jié)核患者的生存質(zhì)量時具有近似等價的實(shí)用性。
[Abstract]:Objective to compare the practicability of health survey summary table (SF- 36) and World Health Organization quality of life scale (WHOQOL-Bref) in evaluating the quality of life of pulmonary tuberculosis patients. Methods from July to September 2013, 201 patients with pulmonary tuberculosis were enrolled in this study. SF- 36 scale and WHOQOL-Bref scale were used to investigate the patients. Reliability analysis, factor analysis and Pearson correlation analysis were used to compare the reliability, validity and internal correlation of the two scales. Results A total of 195 valid questionnaires were collected. The Cronbach 偽 coefficients of SF-36 scale and WHOQOL-Bref scale were 0.920 and 0.863, respectively. The Cronbach 偽 coefficient of SF-36 scale was slightly higher than that of WHOQOLBref scale. Through factor analysis, all the problem items in the two scales could be well classified into the corresponding factors. There was a high correlation coefficient r between similar dimensions of SF- 36 scale and WHOQOL-Bref scale, and P0.05. Conclusion the two scales have good reliability and validity, and can evaluate the quality of life of pulmonary tuberculosis patients comprehensively. That is to say, SF- 36 scale and WHOQOL-Bref scale have approximately equivalent practicability in evaluating the quality of life of pulmonary tuberculosis patients.
【作者單位】： 四川大學(xué)華西臨床醫(yī)學(xué)院;四川大學(xué)華西醫(yī)院呼吸內(nèi)科;
【基金】：國家科技重大專項(2012ZX10004-901)~~
【分類號】：R521

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張淑香;生存質(zhì)量評價在中醫(yī)藥治療惡性腫瘤領(lǐng)域內(nèi)的應(yīng)用[J];湖北中醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2003年01期

2 楊林,全東明,郭紅革,吳東玲;肺結(jié)核患者生存質(zhì)量的調(diào)查分析[J];臨床肺科雜志;2003年05期

3 范紅萍,邱永梅,田軍;提高原發(fā)性硬化性膽管炎患者生存質(zhì)量的護(hù)理[J];齊齊哈爾醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2003年10期

4 梁執(zhí)群,薛云珍,侯紹英,張云華,武潔殊,喬春霞;2型糖尿病患者生存質(zhì)量相關(guān)因素的研究[J];中國公共衛(wèi)生;2004年11期

5 吳建能,李曉春,劉愛瑛;健康教育在提高2型糖尿病患者生存質(zhì)量中的作用[J];齊齊哈爾醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年11期

6 陳啟眾;張毓洪;周學(xué)仁;宋偉偉;王春玲;;銀川市社區(qū)2型糖尿病患者生存質(zhì)量及其影響因素研究[J];寧夏醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2006年03期

7 何小梅;;注重改善惡性腫瘤患者的生存質(zhì)量[J];中華醫(yī)院管理雜志;2006年03期

8 王秀玲;;知情護(hù)理和保密護(hù)理對肝癌患者生存質(zhì)量的對比分析[J];齊魯護(hù)理雜志;2006年19期

9 張t，

本文編號：2528640