媒體關(guān)注、機(jī)構(gòu)投資者與股價(jià)同步性
[Abstract]:The information content of stock price is the key factor that affects the efficiency of resource allocation in capital market. The synchronization of stock price is the main index to measure the information content of stock price, which indicates that the stock price of a company rises or falls simultaneously in a certain period of time. Compared with the developed countries, the phenomenon of "rising and falling together" in China's capital market is more serious, and the information content of stock price ranks first in the world, which results in a large amount of noise in the stock price of the company. It reduces the content of company level information in stock price, seriously affects the effectiveness of capital market guiding resource allocation, and damages the interests of small and medium-sized investors in varying degrees. Institutional investor system emerges as the times require, as a market participant, institutional investors have certain professional skills and capital advantages, how does it affect the synchronism of stock price? In improving the information quality of listed companies and protecting the legitimate rights and interests of investors, the media, as an external governance mechanism, is playing a more and more important role. Can media concern really improve the information environment of the capital market? How does the media affect the synchronism of stock prices? How does the media regulate the relationship between institutional investors and stock price synchronization? This article will carry on the research to the above question. Combining normative and empirical research methods, this paper first reviews the literature on media concern, institutional investors and stock price synchronism at home and abroad, based on the theory of information economics and behavioral finance. The information asymmetry theory analyzes the mechanism of institutional investors' influence on stock price synchronism and puts forward research hypotheses. It empirically tests the influence of institutional investors on stock price synchronism, which is based on reputation theory. The information asymmetry theory analyzes the influence mechanism of media attention on stock price synchronism and puts forward the research hypothesis, and empirically tests the influence of media attention on stock price synchronicity. The results show that the increase of shareholding ratio and media attention of institutional investors can significantly reduce the synchronicity of stock prices, compared with gray institutional investors, independent institutional investors have a more significant role in reducing the synchronicity of stock prices. After adding media attention variables, the relationship between institutional investors and stock price synchronization is significantly positive, which indicates that institutional investors and media concern play a substitute role in stock price synchronization. The increase of media attention will weaken the negative effect of institutional investors on stock price synchronism. The revelation is that the stock price synchronously reflects the information efficiency of the stock market in China's capital market. On the one hand, we should perfect the relevant system of securities market, promote the diversified development of institutional investors and improve their own professional quality; on the other hand, we should perfect the media management system, standardize the behavior of media reporting, and then reduce the synchronism of stock price.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:中南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:G206;F832.51
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 肖浩;詹雷;;新聞媒體報(bào)道、分析師行為與股價(jià)同步性[J];廈門大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年04期
2 伊志宏;李穎;江軒宇;;女性分析師關(guān)注與股價(jià)同步性[J];金融研究;2015年11期
3 胡軍;王甄;;微博、特質(zhì)性信息披露與股價(jià)同步性[J];金融研究;2015年11期
4 莫冬燕;;媒體關(guān)注:市場(chǎng)監(jiān)督還是市場(chǎng)壓力——基于企業(yè)盈余管理行為的研究[J];宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2015年11期
5 逯東;付鵬;楊丹;;媒體類型、媒體關(guān)注與上市公司內(nèi)部控制質(zhì)量[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2015年04期
6 鄧德強(qiáng);溫素彬;潘琳娜;劉昊天;;內(nèi)部控制質(zhì)量、機(jī)構(gòu)投資者異質(zhì)性與持股決策:基于自選擇模型的實(shí)證研究[J];管理評(píng)論;2014年10期
7 韓晴;王華;;獨(dú)立董事責(zé)任險(xiǎn)、機(jī)構(gòu)投資者與公司治理[J];南開管理評(píng)論;2014年05期
8 羅進(jìn)輝;杜興強(qiáng);;媒體報(bào)道、制度環(huán)境與股價(jià)崩盤風(fēng)險(xiǎn)[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2014年09期
9 周林潔;;公司治理、機(jī)構(gòu)持股與股價(jià)同步性[J];金融研究;2014年08期
10 張斌;王躍堂;;業(yè)務(wù)復(fù)雜度、獨(dú)立董事行業(yè)專長與股價(jià)同步性[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2014年07期
,本文編號(hào):2296343
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/xinwenchuanbolunwen/2296343.html