發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-23 19:56

  本文選題：公共利益 + 司法監(jiān)督�。� 參考：《山西大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2017年02期

【摘要】：文章從社會(huì)公共利益的角度,對媒介報(bào)道與司法公開公正及其對社會(huì)的影響進(jìn)行了分析。作者借鑒國外相關(guān)規(guī)則“雷諾茲特權(quán)”,闡述了公共利益抗辯原則適用于司法的路徑及其原理;并就司法知情權(quán)的制度保障提出了建議。在媒體與司法的關(guān)系上,媒體對公開審判案件的事實(shí)的報(bào)道權(quán)利源于公眾知情權(quán);對司法審判結(jié)果的討論批評權(quán)源于憲法。媒介與司法基于社會(huì)共同利益目標(biāo)實(shí)現(xiàn)而建立起良性關(guān)系,是社會(huì)進(jìn)步的根本條件之一。
[Abstract]:From the angle of social public interest, this paper analyzes the media report and the justice of judicial openness and its influence on society. Referring to the relevant rules of foreign countries, "Reynolds privilege", the author expounds the path and principle of applying the principle of public interest defense to the administration of justice, and puts forward some suggestions on the system guarantee of judicial right to know. In the relation between the media and the judiciary, the media's right to report the facts of public trial cases originates from the public's right to know, and the right to discuss and criticize the judicial results comes from the constitution. It is one of the fundamental conditions for social progress to establish a benign relationship between media and judicature based on the realization of social common interests.
【作者單位】： 中國人民大學(xué)新聞學(xué)院;中國人民大學(xué)新聞與社會(huì)發(fā)展研究中心;
【分類號】：G211

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 時(shí)翔　金晶;和平發(fā)展的中國符合國際社會(huì)共同利益[N];人民日報(bào);2007年

，

本文編號：1793384