本文關(guān)鍵詞： 敘事性研究 環(huán)流 人文性 地方知識(shí) 主體性　出處：《新聞與傳播研究》2017年04期 　論文類(lèi)型：期刊論文

【摘要】：從一場(chǎng)關(guān)于"講故事"論文的合法性討論,可以窺視傳播學(xué)學(xué)科內(nèi)部?jī)煞N詮釋社群——詮釋主義與實(shí)證主義的范式差異。敘事性研究強(qiáng)調(diào)敘事作為人類(lèi)經(jīng)驗(yàn)的核心,在某種程度上溢出了傳統(tǒng)質(zhì)性研究及民族志的框架,表現(xiàn)出更為激進(jìn)的文化態(tài)度,因此需要學(xué)術(shù)社群進(jìn)一步反思辨析建立基本共識(shí)。它指向的地方知識(shí)的生產(chǎn)既是詮釋多重現(xiàn)實(shí)的意義之網(wǎng)的必經(jīng)之路,也是知識(shí)生產(chǎn)者在學(xué)術(shù)及文化上尋求雙重主體性的結(jié)果。敘事性研究方法在傳播學(xué)學(xué)科的應(yīng)用,人文性傳統(tǒng)對(duì)主流實(shí)證主義范式的反撥,都是一種打破學(xué)術(shù)內(nèi)眷性的學(xué)術(shù)"環(huán)流"。
[Abstract]:From a discussion on the legitimacy of "storytelling", we can see the paradigm difference between hermeneutics and positivism in two kinds of hermeneutics within the discipline of communication. Narrative studies emphasize narrative as the core of human experience. To some extent, it overflows the framework of traditional qualitative research and ethnography, showing a more radical cultural attitude. Therefore, it is necessary for the academic community to further reflect on discrimination and build a basic consensus. The production of local knowledge that it points to is the only way to interpret the network of meanings of multiple realities. It is also the result of the knowledge producers seeking the dual subjectivity in the academic and cultural aspects. The application of narrative research methods in the communication science, the reversal of the mainstream positivist paradigm by the humanism tradition, is also the result of the knowledge producers seeking for the dual subjectivity in the academic and cultural fields. It is a kind of academic circulation which breaks the internal academic attention.
【作者單位】： 南京大學(xué)新聞傳播學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金項(xiàng)目“基于社交網(wǎng)絡(luò)的青年群體日常社會(huì)-文化實(shí)踐研究”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):14BXW043)的階段性成果
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：G206
，

本文編號(hào)：1537970