預設的概念源于哲學、邏輯學,但對預設研究最多、最熱情的是語言學界。目前有關預設的相關研究已經(jīng)取得了諸多成果,但對某些特殊領域的語用預設現(xiàn)象的研究還比較少。有研究者對庭審中的語用預設現(xiàn)象做了研究,但其中大多數(shù)的研究停留在庭審中雙方律師在詢問中對語用預設交際策略的表層形式的描述上。事實上,在庭審過程中使用預設策略的不僅僅是律師,包括法官、公訴人和庭審中的當事人都會使用預設。鑒于法庭庭審問答是具有沖突性的、以目的為導向的言語行為,對法庭庭審互動中的預設進行認知語用解釋有著很大的必要性。 本文嘗試從認知語用的角度,運用斯波伯和威爾遜的關聯(lián)理論,通過對一些庭審案例中語用預設現(xiàn)象的分析,應用描述和闡釋相結(jié)合的方法對在庭審中語用預設的生成、理解、特點以及作用將做詳細、深入的分析、研究。從而幫助人們更深入認識和理解法庭庭審互動中的預設現(xiàn)象,也為預設研究提供新的視角。 本研究嘗試用語用預設的關聯(lián)理論模式來解釋中國法律庭審互動中語用預設的生成、特點以及語用預設的取消。本研究采用定性分析的方法對語料做了分析和闡釋。本研究所用語料收集于蘭州中級人民法院民事案件的庭審記錄。通過對八小時多錄音的撰寫,用2,200...

【文章頁數(shù)】：69 頁

【學位級別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Abstract
內(nèi)容摘要
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Rationale of the Study
    1.2 Research Objective, Method and Data
    1.3 Significance and Feasibility of the Study
    1.4 Layout of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Relevance Studies on Courtroom Trial
        2.1.1 A Brief Introduction of Forensic Linguistics
        2.1.2 Relevant Studies on Courtroom Discourse
    2.2 Relevant Studies on Presupposition
        2.2.1 Philosophical Background
        2.2.2 Definitions of Presupposition
        2.2.3 Presupposition Researches in Linguistic Field
            2.2.3.1 Presupposition Researches in Semantics
            2.2.3.2 Presupposition Researches in Pragmatics
            2.2.3.3 Presupposition Researches in Cognitive Linguistics
    2.3 Studies on Presupposition in Legal Context
        2.3.1 Studies of Presupposition in Courtroom Interaction Abroad
        2.3.2 Current Studies at Home
        2.3.3 A Brief Comment on the Researches at Home and Abroad
    2.4 Summary
Chapter Three Theoretical Framework
    3.1 A Brief Introduction of Relevance Theory
    3.2 Some Basic Concepts in Relevance Theory
        3.2.1 Assumption
        3.2.2 Cognitive Environment and Mutual Manifestness
        3.2.3 Ostensive-inferential Communication and Informative and Communicative Intentions
        3.2.4 Optimal Relevance
    3.3 A Cognitive-pragmatic Account of Presupposition
        3.3.1 A Relevance-theoretical Model of Presupposition
        3.3.2 A Relevance-theoretical Explanation of Presupposition
            3.3.2.1.P resupposition and Cognitive Environment
            3.3.2.2 Pragmatic Presupposition and Ostensive-inferential Communication
            3.3.2.3 Pragmatic Presupposition and Expectation of Relevance
        3.3.3 Pragmatic Presupposition and its Defeasibility
    3.4 A Brief Introduction of the Principle of Goal-direction
    3.5 Summary
Chapter Four A Cognitive-Pragmatic Interpretation of Presupposition in Courtroom Interaction
    4.1 Research Questions
    4.2 Research Method
    4.3 Data Collection
    4.4 Data Analysis
        4.4.1 Motivations for a Cognitive-pragmatic Interpretation
        4.4.2 The Generating and Interpretation of Presupposition in Courtroom Interaction
        4.4.3 Features of Presupposition in Courtroom Interaction
        4.4.4 Interpretation of the Defeasibility of Presupposition Traps
    4.5 Summary
Chapter Five Conclusions
    5.1 Summery of the Findings
    5.2 Enlightenment for Linguistics
    5.3 Enlightenment for Judicial Practice
    5.4 Limitations and Suggestions for Further Research
Bibliography
Acknowledgements



本文編號：3957436