及物性視角下美國、英國、尼日利亞和南非媒體關(guān)于2018年中非合作論壇新聞報道的態(tài)度對比分析
發(fā)布時間:2021-10-14 12:55
2018年中非合作論壇北京峰會在北京成功舉辦,引起了國內(nèi)外媒體的廣泛關(guān)注。南非和尼日利作為中非合作論壇的重要參與者,積極進(jìn)行了相關(guān)報道,同時,由于歷史原因,美國和英國也密切關(guān)注中非合作論壇,關(guān)注中國在非洲不斷增強(qiáng)的影響力。為了準(zhǔn)確了解并揭示以上四個國家主流媒體對2018中非合作論壇的態(tài)度,本研究選取美國主流媒體10篇、英國主流媒體14篇、尼日利亞主流媒體14篇、南非主流媒體10篇有關(guān)2018中非合作論壇的報道作為語料,語料總計超過4萬字。在及物性理論指導(dǎo)下,本研究在小句層面對所選語料進(jìn)行了全面、細(xì)致的及物性分析,并借助語料庫軟件UAM corpus tool3.3,標(biāo)注并統(tǒng)計了及物性的總體分布情況、及物性各個過程的分布以及及物性過程中過程、參與者和環(huán)境的搭配。通過上述研究發(fā)現(xiàn),本研究描述并比較了四個國家主流媒體對于2018中非合作論壇的態(tài)度。研究表明,四個國家的新聞報道都選擇不同的及物性過程、參與者和環(huán)境的組合,其中物質(zhì)過程多用于說明中非合作論壇給中國和非洲國家的機(jī)會和挑戰(zhàn);關(guān)系過程強(qiáng)調(diào)中非合作中的問題和影響;言語過程利用不同話語來源呈現(xiàn)不同利益相關(guān)方對中非合作的態(tài)度。及物性運(yùn)用的差異...
【文章來源】:大連外國語大學(xué)遼寧省
【文章頁數(shù)】:85 頁
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【文章目錄】:
ABSTRACT
摘要
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION
1.1 Research background
1.2 Significance of the study
1.3 Objectives of the study
1.4 Overall structure of this thesis
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 The theory of transitivity
2.1.1 Material process
2.1.2 Mental process
2.1.3 Relational process
2.1.4 Behavioral process
2.1.5 Verbal process
2.1.6 Existential process
2.2 Empirical studies using transitivity
2.2.1 The use of transitivity in news discourse analysis
2.2.2 Transitivity analysis and attitude
2.3 Studies of English-speaking African countries
2.3.1 Studies of English-speaking African countries from linguistic perspective
2.3.2 Studies of English-speaking African countries from other perspectives
CHAPTER THREE RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Research questions
3.2 Data collection and description
3.3 Research instrument
3.4 Research design
3.5 Research procedure
CHAPTER FOUR RESULT AND DISCUSSION
4.1 General distribution of transitivity process
4.2 Comparative analysis of elements in transitivity process
4.2.1 The choice of actor in material process
4.2.2 The choice of relational process types
4.2.3 The choice of sayer in verbal process
4.2.4 The choice of senser in mental process
4.2.5 The use of existential process and behavioral process
4.3 Attitudes revealed towards the2018 FOCAC
4.3.1 Attitudes reflected by actor
4.3.2 Attitudes reflected by relational process types
4.3.3 Attitudes reflected by sayer
4.3.4 Attitudes reflected by senser
4.3.5 Attitudes reflected by existential process and behavioral process
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSIONS
5.1 Major findings of present study
5.2 Limitations of present study
5.3 Possibilities for further study
REFERENCES
APPENDIX
【參考文獻(xiàn)】:
期刊論文
[1]從功能語言學(xué)看英國主流媒體對“一帶一路”倡議的態(tài)度變化[J]. 聶薇. 解放軍外國語學(xué)院學(xué)報. 2018(06)
[2]中非合作論壇的緣起、成就與發(fā)展前景(英文)[J]. 曾愛平,舒展. China International Studies. 2018(05)
[3]中非命運(yùn)共同體建設(shè)進(jìn)入新階段[J]. 黃昭宇. 現(xiàn)代國際關(guān)系. 2018(08)
[4]南非媒體視角的“一帶一路”[J]. 張虹. 中國外語. 2018(03)
[5]及物性視角下英語新聞?wù)Z篇的批評性話語分析——以《印度時報》對“一帶一路”的報道為例[J]. 尚學(xué)南. 河南工程學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版). 2017(04)
[6]尼日利亞“美強(qiáng)中弱”的外交格局[J]. 聶文娟. 江南社會學(xué)院學(xué)報. 2017(02)
[7]涉非三方合作:中國何以作為?[J]. 張春. 西亞非洲. 2017(03)
[8]中非合作論壇15年:成就、挑戰(zhàn)與展望[J]. 周玉淵. 西亞非洲. 2016(01)
[9]《聲聲慢》原文和譯文及物性對比分析——以林語堂譯本為例[J]. 蔡銀. 牡丹江教育學(xué)院學(xué)報. 2015(10)
[10]從及物性視角對比中美新聞?wù)Z篇——以《中國日報》和《紐約時報》對中共十八大的新聞報道語篇為例[J]. 甘小亞,余麗華,黃珊. 河南工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版). 2015(01)
本文編號:3436197
【文章來源】:大連外國語大學(xué)遼寧省
【文章頁數(shù)】:85 頁
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【文章目錄】:
ABSTRACT
摘要
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION
1.1 Research background
1.2 Significance of the study
1.3 Objectives of the study
1.4 Overall structure of this thesis
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 The theory of transitivity
2.1.1 Material process
2.1.2 Mental process
2.1.3 Relational process
2.1.4 Behavioral process
2.1.5 Verbal process
2.1.6 Existential process
2.2 Empirical studies using transitivity
2.2.1 The use of transitivity in news discourse analysis
2.2.2 Transitivity analysis and attitude
2.3 Studies of English-speaking African countries
2.3.1 Studies of English-speaking African countries from linguistic perspective
2.3.2 Studies of English-speaking African countries from other perspectives
CHAPTER THREE RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Research questions
3.2 Data collection and description
3.3 Research instrument
3.4 Research design
3.5 Research procedure
CHAPTER FOUR RESULT AND DISCUSSION
4.1 General distribution of transitivity process
4.2 Comparative analysis of elements in transitivity process
4.2.1 The choice of actor in material process
4.2.2 The choice of relational process types
4.2.3 The choice of sayer in verbal process
4.2.4 The choice of senser in mental process
4.2.5 The use of existential process and behavioral process
4.3 Attitudes revealed towards the2018 FOCAC
4.3.1 Attitudes reflected by actor
4.3.2 Attitudes reflected by relational process types
4.3.3 Attitudes reflected by sayer
4.3.4 Attitudes reflected by senser
4.3.5 Attitudes reflected by existential process and behavioral process
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSIONS
5.1 Major findings of present study
5.2 Limitations of present study
5.3 Possibilities for further study
REFERENCES
APPENDIX
【參考文獻(xiàn)】:
期刊論文
[1]從功能語言學(xué)看英國主流媒體對“一帶一路”倡議的態(tài)度變化[J]. 聶薇. 解放軍外國語學(xué)院學(xué)報. 2018(06)
[2]中非合作論壇的緣起、成就與發(fā)展前景(英文)[J]. 曾愛平,舒展. China International Studies. 2018(05)
[3]中非命運(yùn)共同體建設(shè)進(jìn)入新階段[J]. 黃昭宇. 現(xiàn)代國際關(guān)系. 2018(08)
[4]南非媒體視角的“一帶一路”[J]. 張虹. 中國外語. 2018(03)
[5]及物性視角下英語新聞?wù)Z篇的批評性話語分析——以《印度時報》對“一帶一路”的報道為例[J]. 尚學(xué)南. 河南工程學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版). 2017(04)
[6]尼日利亞“美強(qiáng)中弱”的外交格局[J]. 聶文娟. 江南社會學(xué)院學(xué)報. 2017(02)
[7]涉非三方合作:中國何以作為?[J]. 張春. 西亞非洲. 2017(03)
[8]中非合作論壇15年:成就、挑戰(zhàn)與展望[J]. 周玉淵. 西亞非洲. 2016(01)
[9]《聲聲慢》原文和譯文及物性對比分析——以林語堂譯本為例[J]. 蔡銀. 牡丹江教育學(xué)院學(xué)報. 2015(10)
[10]從及物性視角對比中美新聞?wù)Z篇——以《中國日報》和《紐約時報》對中共十八大的新聞報道語篇為例[J]. 甘小亞,余麗華,黃珊. 河南工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版). 2015(01)
本文編號:3436197
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/3436197.html