法庭話語作為法律語言學(xué)研究的一個重要方面,近年來引起學(xué)界愈來愈多的關(guān)注。法庭審判活動是法庭話語的體現(xiàn),它是通過一系列言語行為來進(jìn)行的。法庭審判作為最重要的法律實踐活動,其過程涉及到是否能體現(xiàn)程序公正,司法公正的問題;其結(jié)果關(guān)系到當(dāng)事人的財產(chǎn)得失、被告人權(quán)利的剝奪、定罪量刑的輕重等切身利益。因此法庭言語行為研究具有重要的理論和實踐意義。該研究是以Austin和Searle的言語行為理論為基礎(chǔ)和理論框架,結(jié)合話語分析的方法,并根據(jù)案例語料,從語用學(xué)角度對中國法庭話語的言語行為來進(jìn)行分析。目前,雖然國內(nèi)對法律語言學(xué)的研究很關(guān)注,但主要集中在對法律語言的詞匯、句法和翻譯方面,而對法庭話語及其言語行為研究卻很少涉及。本文旨在運(yùn)用語用學(xué)的言語行為理論來闡述法庭言語行為的規(guī)則、特點(diǎn)和方式、以及具體分析法庭審判中的主要參與者——法律工作者的言語行為。該研究不僅有利于我們對法庭言語行為有更深刻的理解,而且為規(guī)范法律語言、完善司法制度、體現(xiàn)程序公正、司法公正提供了新的視角。本文首先對Austin和Searle的言語行為理論和國內(nèi)外對法庭話語的研究進(jìn)行介紹,然后運(yùn)用言語行為理論來論述法庭話語中的言語行為構(gòu)成... 

【文章來源】：西南政法大學(xué)重慶市

【文章頁數(shù)】：83 頁

【學(xué)位級別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Abstract
摘要
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION
    1.1 Rationale for the Study
    1.2 Statement of Problems
    1.3 Purpose of the Study
    1.4 Significance of the Study
    1.5 Scope and Limitation of the Study
    1.6 Organization of This Thesis
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW
    2.1 Overview on Speech Act Theory
        2.1.1 Austin’s Speech Act Theory
            2.1.1.1 Performatives and Constatives
            2.1.1.2 Felicity Conditions on Performatives
            2.1.1.3 Tripartite Acts in a Speech Act
            2.1.1.4 Austin’s classification of illocutionary acts
        2.1.2 Searle’s Development of Speech Act Theory
            2.1.2.1 Searle’s Classification of Speech Acts
            2.1.2.2 Searle’s Rules of Speech Acts
            2.1.2.3 Searle’s Felicity Conditions on Illocutionary Acts
    2.2 Courtroom Discourse
        2.2.1 Definition of Courtroom Discourse
        2.2.2 Characteristics of Courtroom Discourse
        2.2.3 A Brief Introduction to the Studies on Courtroom Discourse
            2.2.3.1 Studies on Courtroom Discourse Abroad
            2.2.3.2 Studies on courtroom discourse at home
        2.2.4 Studies on Speech Acts in Courtroom Discourse
CHAPTER THREE APPLICATION OF SPEECH ACT THEORY TCOURTROOM DISCOURSE
    3.1 Constitutive Rules of Speech Acts in Courtroom Discourse
        3.1.1 Rule of Jurisprudence
        3.1.2 Rule of the Right to Speak
        3.1.3 Rule of Procedures
        3.1.4 Rule of Evidence
        3.1.5 Rule of Debate
    3.2 Felicity Conditions of the Speech Acts in Courtroom Discourse
        3.2.1 Asymmetry of the Right to Speak
        3.2.2 Legal Procedures of Courtroom Discourse
        3.2.3 Necessity of Interactive Debate in Court
    3.3 Classification of the Speech Acts in Courtroom Discourse
        3.3.1 Representatives
        3.3.2 Directives
        3.3.3 Commissives
        3.3.4 Expressives
        3.3.5 Declarations
CAPTER FOUR ANALYSIS OF THE SPEECH ACTS IN CHINESE COURTROOM DISCOURSE
    4.1 Analysis of Courtroom Participants’Speech Acts
        4.1.1 Analysis of Judges’Speech Acts
        4.1.2 Analysis of Public Prosecutors’Speech Acts
        4.1.3 Analysis of Lawyers’Speech Acts
    4.2 Means of the Speech Acts performed in Courtroom Discourse
        4.2.1 Question-Answer
        4.2.2 Statement
        4.2.3 Debate
        4.2.4 Direction
        4.2.5 Declaration
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION
    5.1 Summary
    5.2 Some Implications
    5.3 Suggestions for further research
Bibliography



本文編號：3347233