發(fā)布時(shí)間：2023-06-10 14:42

　　連詞在句子識(shí)解和連貫語篇構(gòu)建方面有著很重要的作用。近年來,很多學(xué)者對(duì)表達(dá)因果、條件、讓步等關(guān)系的連詞或復(fù)句進(jìn)行過研究。從理論研究的角度看,學(xué)者們從認(rèn)知語言學(xué)、語用學(xué)、句法和語義的角度對(duì)因果復(fù)句和條件復(fù)句進(jìn)行過梳理。從實(shí)證研究的角度看,許多學(xué)者通過眼動(dòng)和事件相關(guān)電位技術(shù)研究過因果復(fù)句、條件復(fù)句以及因果連詞與讓步連詞對(duì)句子理解的差異對(duì)比。有學(xué)者發(fā)現(xiàn):當(dāng)被試閱讀復(fù)句時(shí),被試默認(rèn)推斷句子間的關(guān)系為因果關(guān)系,并提出“條件關(guān)系是因果關(guān)系的次范疇”,這些為因果復(fù)句和條件復(fù)句的分類和運(yùn)用,以及兩者的對(duì)比積累了成果。前人的研究為因果復(fù)句和條件復(fù)句的實(shí)證研究打下了基礎(chǔ),但還沒有學(xué)者從實(shí)證研究的角度研究過漢語因果連詞和條件連詞對(duì)復(fù)句理解加工的影響。本文借助事件相關(guān)電位(ERPs),考察連詞對(duì)不同類型復(fù)句的影響。本文的研究目的在于探討因果連詞“因?yàn)?.....所以......”和條件連詞“如果......那么......”分別在邏輯因果復(fù)句和邏輯條件復(fù)句的加工過程中的腦機(jī)制及反應(yīng)時(shí)差異,以此來驗(yàn)證Millis&Just在1994年提出的“the Connective Integration Model...

【文章頁數(shù)】：97 頁

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
Acknowledgements
Abbreviations
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Research Background
    1.2 Research Objective
    1.3 Methodology
    1.4 Significance of the Present Study
    1.5 Layout of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Introduction
    2.2 Causals and Conditionals Revisited
        2.2.1 Definition of Causals and Conditionals
            2.2.1.1 Definition of Causals
            2.2.1.2 Definition of Conditionals
        2.2.2 Classification of Causals and Conditionals
            2.2.2.1 Classification of Causals
            2.2.2.2 Classification of Conditionals
    2.3 ERPs and Language Research
        2.3.1 An Introduction of ERPs Technique
        2.3.2 Application of ERPs Technique to Language Research
        2.3.3 Major Component Related to the Present Study
    2.4 Previous Studies on Causals and Conditionals
        2.4.1 Theoretical Studies on Causals and Conditionals
            2.4.1.1 Cognitive-Pragmatic Approach to Causals
            2.4.1.2 Cognitive-Pragmatic Approach to Conditionals
            2.4.1.3 Summary
        2.4.2 Neuro-Cognitive Approach to Causals and Conditionals
            2.4.2.1 Eye Tracking Studies
            2.4.2.2 ERPs Studies
            2.4.2.3 Summary
        2.4.3 Comments on Previous Studies
    2.5 Previous Studies on Connectives
        2.5.1 Theoretical Framework of the Connective Integration     Model
        2.5.2 Previous Studies on Connectives
        2.5.3 Comments on Previous Studies to Connectives
    2.6 Summary
Chapter Three Methodology
    3.1 Research Question
    3.2 Research Design
    3.3 Method
        3.3.1 Participants
        3.3.2 Materials
        3.3.3 Instruments
        3.3.4 Procedures
    3.4 Data Collection
    3.5 Summary
Chapter Four Results and Discussion
    4.1 Behavioral Results
    4.2 ERPs Results
        4.2.1 Comparison of Differences in Construal Processing Logical Causals and Logical Conditionals with and without Connectives
            4.2.1.1 1000ms-2200ms
            4.2.1.2 2200ms-3200ms
        4.2.2 Comparison of Processing Logical Causals and Logical     Conditionals with and without Connectives in Brain Area
            4.2.2.1 1000ms-2200ms
            4.2.2.2 2200ms-3200ms
            4.2.2.3 Summary
    4.3 Discussion
        4.3.1 Discussion on Logical Causals and Logical Conditionals in Rating and Response Time Results
            4.3.1.1 Differences in Logical Causals and Logical Conditionals with and without Connectives on Rating Results
            4.3.1.2 Differences in Logical Causals and Logical Conditionals with and without Connectives on Response Time Results
        4.3.2 Discussion on Processing Logical Causals and Logical Conditionals in Brain Areas
    4.4 Summary
Chapter Five Conclusions
    5.1 Major Findings
    5.2 Implications
    5.3 Limitations and Suggestions for Further Studies
References
Appendix 1 The Profile of Subject
Appendix 2 Instruction and Materials



本文編號(hào)：3833048