作為一種社會交往中使用頻率較高的禮貌言語行為,恭維語是社會交際的“潤滑劑”,使得交際能夠在和諧融洽的氛圍中順利進行。同時恭維語也是具備多項職能的社會言語行為,它不僅可以縮短交際者的社會距離,而且還可以聯(lián)絡感情,維系社會正常的人際關系。人們的日常生活中會經(jīng)常用到恭維語,與人交談用到恭維語可使人與人之間的關系得到改善,本文針對漢英電視訪談節(jié)目里用到的恭維語及如何應答進行分析比較,把提高跨越文化能力作為目標,努力摸索出在不同的文化背景下怎樣更好的接受恭維語的有效方法。作者以娛樂性訪談節(jié)目為主,同時挑選出包括有政治、經(jīng)濟內容的漢英訪談節(jié)目,語料主要來自涉及真實訪談節(jié)目內容的書籍或視頻,并最終確定了有恭維言語行為的數(shù)據(jù)共404項作為研究對象,其中漢語訪談節(jié)目中的恭維語214項,英語訪談節(jié)目中的恭維語190項。作者從跨文化交際的角度對英漢恭維語應答策略進行了比較,以期能發(fā)現(xiàn)它們之間的相同點和不同點,目的是描述訪談節(jié)目中的被采訪者使用不同應答策略時在該領域所表現(xiàn)出的文化共性和差異,其意義在于對外語學習者有所啟發(fā)和幫助,減少語用失誤。研究結果發(fā)現(xiàn),漢英訪談節(jié)目中的恭維言語行為呈現(xiàn)出程式化的模式,而高頻... 

【文章來源】：山西師范大學山西省

【文章頁數(shù)】：69 頁

【學位級別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Abstract
摘要
1. Introduction
    1.1 Research Background
    1.2 Purpose and Significance of the Study
    1.3 Structure of the Thesis
2. Literature Review
    2.1 Compliment Studies Abroad
    2.2 Domestic Studies of Complement
3. Theoretical Frameworks of the Research
    3.1 Politeness Theory
        3.1.1 Face Threatening Acts
        3.1.2 Politeness Strategies
        3.1.3 D rating, P rating &R rating
    3.2 High-context Culture & Low-context Culture
    3.3 Intercultural Communicative Competence (ICC)
4. Research Methodology
    4.1 Research Objectives and Hypotheses
    4.2 Materials and Data Collection
5. Results
    5.1 Frequency of Compliment in Interview Programs
    5.2 Compliment Formulas in Interview Programs
        5.2.1 American Convergent Formulas and Chinese Decentralized Formulas
        5.2.2 A Transformation of “I like/love NP” in the Deference Politeness System
        5.2.3 “Compliment, but/however”—One of the “Redressive Strategies of Politeness”
        5.2.4 Summary
    5.3 Compliment Functions in Interview Programs
        5.3.1 Admiration—Satisfying the Hearer’s Positive Face
        5.3.2 Softening Criticism—Minimizing the Face Threatening Acts
        5.3.3 Gratitude—Threatening the Speaker’s Negative Face
    5.4 Compliment Responses in Interview Programs
        5.4.1 The Strategy of “Other Interpretation”
        5.4.2 Chinese Appreciation Token, Comment Acceptance, Comment History vs. American Appreciation Token, Comment Acceptance, No Acknowledgement
        5.4.3 Praise Upgrade—Satisfying the Speaker’s Positive Face
        5.4.4 Return—A kind of Compromising Strategy
6. Conclusion
    6.1 Major Findings
    6.2 Implications for Intercultural Communication
    6.3 Limitations and Further Suggestions of the Research
Acknowledgements
Bibliography
Appendix A
Appendix B



本文編號：3425502