發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-10-12 21:09

【摘要】：話語標(biāo)記語的研究是近來語言學(xué)研究十分關(guān)注的課題之一。法庭問答互動(dòng)中話語標(biāo)記語的研究可以將法律語言學(xué)與語用學(xué)結(jié)合，法律語言學(xué)和社會(huì)語言學(xué)結(jié)合，從理論到應(yīng)用研究，是一個(gè)新領(lǐng)域和新思路，為話語標(biāo)記語的研究提供了一個(gè)新視角。這樣有助于從理論上重新認(rèn)識話語標(biāo)記語這類語言結(jié)構(gòu)在言語交際中的主要作用，改變僅僅從句法-語義的層面對語言結(jié)構(gòu)進(jìn)行分析的傳統(tǒng)研究習(xí)慣，結(jié)合當(dāng)今語言學(xué)的最新研究成果對其展開分析具有理論上的先進(jìn)性、及時(shí)性，能夠與國外的相關(guān)研究保持同步。 本文以法庭問答互動(dòng)中的話語標(biāo)記語為核心概念，，在以目的原則為主要理論指導(dǎo)和關(guān)聯(lián)理論為輔助理論指導(dǎo)下，通過文獻(xiàn)綜述法和對3場法庭審判案例語料的定性分析，旨在探討(1)法庭問答互動(dòng)中話語標(biāo)記語的可操作性定義、特點(diǎn)、分類和功能。(2)法庭問答互動(dòng)中所有參與人如何使用話語標(biāo)記語在不同的目的關(guān)系和互動(dòng)中實(shí)現(xiàn)其話語目的的。(3)話語標(biāo)記語在社會(huì)應(yīng)用中的實(shí)踐價(jià)值。 文章分為六個(gè)章節(jié)。第一章介紹了本文的寫作背景，目的及意義，語料來源和研究方法。第二章通過文獻(xiàn)綜述介紹了話語標(biāo)記語的研究現(xiàn)狀。第三章介紹了本文的兩個(gè)理論，目的原則和關(guān)聯(lián)理論對話語標(biāo)記語的解釋。第四章對法庭問答互動(dòng)中的話語標(biāo)記語進(jìn)行了可操作性定義、提出了3種特點(diǎn)、5種類別和3種功能。第五章主要通過具體例子，分析了法庭問答互動(dòng)中的話語標(biāo)記語在目的原則和關(guān)聯(lián)理論指導(dǎo)下的具體應(yīng)用，其中包括：參與人如何使用話語標(biāo)記語在不同的目的關(guān)系和互動(dòng)中實(shí)現(xiàn)其話語目的；5類話語標(biāo)記語在法庭問答互動(dòng)中具體功能表現(xiàn)。最后一章得出相關(guān)結(jié)論，研究法庭話語從話語標(biāo)記語入手具有較強(qiáng)的可行性。參與者目的的不同，所選的話語標(biāo)記語也會(huì)不同。使用話語標(biāo)記語是目的驅(qū)使的，受到目的關(guān)系和目的互動(dòng)的制約。恰當(dāng)使用標(biāo)記語，可以極大增強(qiáng)話語的關(guān)聯(lián)性，增強(qiáng)語境效果，促進(jìn)和指導(dǎo)聽話人尋求最佳關(guān)聯(lián)，進(jìn)而有效解決法庭問答互動(dòng)中聽說雙方聽說和理解的障礙，達(dá)到雙方的目的，促進(jìn)庭審的順利進(jìn)行。
[Abstract]:The study of discourse markers is one of the most important topics in recent linguistic studies. The study of discourse markers in the interaction of questions and answers in court can combine legal linguistics with pragmatics, legal linguistics with sociolinguistics, from theory to application, which is a new field and new thinking. It provides a new perspective for the study of discourse markers. This will help us to reunderstand the main role of discourse markers in verbal communication and change the traditional research habit of analyzing language structures only from the syntactic and semantic levels. Combining with the latest research results of linguistics today, it has the advantage of theoretical advancement and timeliness, and can keep pace with the related research abroad. Under the guidance of the Skopos principle and the relevance Theory, this paper takes the discourse markers as the core concept, through the literature review method and the qualitative analysis of the corpus of three court cases, under the guidance of the Skopos principle and the relevance Theory. The purpose of this study is to explore (1) the operational definition and characteristics of discourse markers in court question and answer interaction. (2) how all participants use discourse markers to achieve their utterances in different teleological relationships and interactions. (3) the practical value of discourse markers in social application. The article is divided into six chapters. The first chapter introduces the writing background, purpose and significance, corpus sources and research methods. Chapter two introduces the research status of discourse markers by literature review. Chapter three introduces the two theories, Skopos principle and relevance Theory. In chapter 4, the author defines the utterances in the interaction of court questions and answers, and puts forward three kinds of features, five categories and three functions. Chapter five analyzes the application of discourse markers under the guidance of Skopos principle and relevance Theory through concrete examples. These include: how participants use discourse markers to achieve their utterances in different teleological relationships and interactions, and how five types of discourse markers perform their specific functions in the interaction of court questions and answers. The last chapter draws the conclusion that it is feasible to study court discourse from discourse markers. Participants will choose different discourse markers for different purposes. The use of discourse markers is driven by purpose and restricted by the interaction of purpose and purpose. The proper use of markers can greatly enhance the relevance of the discourse, enhance the contextual effect, promote and guide the hearer to seek the best relevance, and then effectively solve the obstacles of listening, hearing and understanding between the two sides in the court question and answer interaction, so as to achieve the purpose of both sides. To facilitate the smooth conduct of the trial.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖北工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：H030

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黃大網(wǎng);話語標(biāo)記研究綜述[J];福建外語;2001年01期

2 何自然,莫愛屏;話語標(biāo)記語與語用照應(yīng)[J];廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2002年01期

3 陸少兵;;話語標(biāo)記語“you know”在法庭話語中的作用[J];三峽大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年S2期

4 張麗萍;;論法庭情境中話語標(biāo)記語——從法庭話語中的“我(們)認(rèn)為”談起[J];南京理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年01期

5 冉永平;話語標(biāo)記語的語用學(xué)研究綜述[J];外語研究;2000年04期

6 毛鳳凡;;法庭訊問中的模糊限制語引發(fā)的語用沖突及其對法庭審判的啟示[J];外語研究;2006年02期

7 許靜;;法庭話語中話語標(biāo)記語的順應(yīng)性動(dòng)態(tài)研究[J];外語研究;2009年06期

8 胡桂麗;;目的原則下的刑事審判話語標(biāo)記語研究[J];外語學(xué)刊;2009年04期

9 許靜;;話語標(biāo)記語的元語用功能[J];山東外語教學(xué);2007年04期

10 陳銘浩;張s

本文編號：2267602