【摘要】：“沒(méi)有長(zhǎng)度的棍子”這個(gè)說(shuō)法有意義嗎?此表達(dá)看似極其普通,其語(yǔ)法結(jié)構(gòu)和詞匯成分極其平常,然而細(xì)想一下,沒(méi)有長(zhǎng)度的棍子是什么樣的?沒(méi)人知道,這顯然是不合邏輯的一個(gè)表達(dá)。自然語(yǔ)言中不乏不合邏輯的表達(dá)。關(guān)于不合邏輯的表達(dá)的意義問(wèn)題,在Wittgenstein看來(lái),我們無(wú)法想象也無(wú)法理解不合邏輯的東西；于是不合邏輯的“沒(méi)有長(zhǎng)度的棍子”無(wú)法想象,也無(wú)意義。倘若不合邏輯的表達(dá)式真的是不可想象的、無(wú)意義的表達(dá),那么同樣不合邏輯的“太陽(yáng)從西邊出來(lái)”應(yīng)該也無(wú)法想象,無(wú)意義；然而“太陽(yáng)從西邊出來(lái)”,作為一個(gè)在漢語(yǔ)中代代相傳至今的常用俗語(yǔ),確是不可否認(rèn)的可以想象的(我們可以想象太陽(yáng)從西邊出來(lái)的情境),有意義的表達(dá)。這么一來(lái),在不合邏輯的語(yǔ)言表達(dá)是否有意義的問(wèn)題上,矛盾出現(xiàn)了。 為什么會(huì)出現(xiàn)這樣的矛盾現(xiàn)象,又如何去解決?不合邏輯的語(yǔ)言表達(dá)到底能否付諸想象,它們真的不可想,無(wú)意義嗎?本文認(rèn)為不合邏輯的語(yǔ)言表達(dá)不能簡(jiǎn)單地定為無(wú)意義的表達(dá),它們實(shí)際上可以使是意義豐富的表達(dá)。為證明此論點(diǎn),本文首先從理論上駁斥了維特根斯坦關(guān)于不合邏輯的表達(dá)無(wú)意義的理論依據(jù),然后通過(guò)中英文中實(shí)際存在的不合邏輯的俗語(yǔ)的具體使用來(lái)證明不合邏輯的表達(dá)確是有意義的。 本文共分五章,第一章介紹研究背景,劃定研究范圍和對(duì)象,并闡述研究的目的和意義。第二章概述國(guó)內(nèi)外為數(shù)不多的在不合邏輯的表達(dá)式的意義問(wèn)題上已有的研究,主要是維特根斯坦的研究。第三章先理出維特根斯坦關(guān)于不合邏輯的表達(dá)無(wú)意義的理論依據(jù),從理論上然后逐一進(jìn)行駁斥。第四章通過(guò)漢語(yǔ)和英語(yǔ)中實(shí)際存在的不合邏輯的俗語(yǔ)的使用來(lái)進(jìn)一步實(shí)際論證不合邏輯的表達(dá)是有意義的,而且是意義豐富的表達(dá),之后探討了此類不合邏輯的俗語(yǔ)獲得意義的心理途徑。第五章為結(jié)論部分,概述了本文的研究意義,并指出了本文存在的不足且提出了進(jìn)一步研究的建議。
[Abstract]:Does the term "no length stick" make sense? This expression seems to be extremely common, its grammatical structure and lexical elements are extremely ordinary, but think carefully, what is a stick without length? Nobody knows that this is obviously an illogical expression. There is no shortage of illogical expressions in natural language. With regard to the meaning of illogical expressions, according to Wittgenstein, we cannot imagine or understand illogical things; thus illogical "sticks without length" are unimaginable and meaningless. If illogical expressions are really unimaginable, meaningless expressions, then the equally illogical "sun from the west" should also be unimaginable and meaningless; however, "the sun comes out from the west". As a common saying passed down from generation to generation in Chinese, it is undeniable that we can imagine (we can imagine the situation where the sun comes out from the west), a meaningful expression. Thus, contradictions arise over whether illogical language makes sense. Why is there such a contradiction, and how to solve it? Can illogical expressions be imagined, are they really unthinkable and meaningless? This paper holds that illogical expressions can not simply be defined as meaningless expressions, but they can actually make them rich in meaning. To prove this argument, this paper first refutes Wittgenstein's theory that illogical expression is meaningless. Then the practical use of illogical idioms in both Chinese and English is used to prove that illogical expressions are meaningful. This paper is divided into five chapters. The first chapter introduces the research background, delineates the scope and object of the research, and expounds the purpose and significance of the research. Chapter two summarizes the few researches on the meaning of illogical expressions at home and abroad, mainly on Wittgenstein. In the third chapter, Wittgenstein's theory of illogical expression is discussed and refuted one by one. Chapter four further demonstrates that illogical expression is meaningful and meaningful through the use of illogical idioms in Chinese and English. Then it discusses the psychological approach to the meaning of such illogical idioms. The fifth chapter is the conclusion, summarizes the significance of this paper, points out the shortcomings of this paper and puts forward some suggestions for further study.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：H136.4;H313

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 文炳;陳嘉映;;普通語(yǔ)法、形式語(yǔ)法和哲學(xué)語(yǔ)法比較[J];外語(yǔ)學(xué)刊;2010年01期

2 杜世洪;;關(guān)于假裝的語(yǔ)言分析和概念考察——對(duì)中國(guó)后語(yǔ)言哲學(xué)的一個(gè)思考[J];外語(yǔ)學(xué)刊;2010年02期

3 杜世洪;;論“假裝+V”結(jié)構(gòu)的邏輯問(wèn)題[J];現(xiàn)代外語(yǔ);2010年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：2154719