【摘要】：從傳統(tǒng)的以典故為修辭手法到20世紀(jì)后以典故為漢語(yǔ)詞匯,學(xué)界對(duì)典故的研究可謂從未中斷。從材料上看,研究者多以傳世文獻(xiàn)為主,墓志材料還未全面跟進(jìn)。近年來(lái),學(xué)界對(duì)墓志典故非常重視,從漢魏六朝到隋唐,墓志典故研究取得了很大的進(jìn)展。 本文在研讀600多方中晚唐墓志的基礎(chǔ)上,挑選出用典比較集中,具有代表性的墓志194篇,在墓志典故詞語(yǔ)整理成表的過(guò)程中對(duì)墓志典故進(jìn)行多方面的考察。文章主體分為五部分： 第一章為緒論,主要對(duì)典故的概念進(jìn)行界定,同時(shí)分析墓志中典故運(yùn)用的必然性。第二章為中晚唐墓志典故詞語(yǔ)研究,墓志典故詞語(yǔ)典面形式多樣、典義動(dòng)態(tài)變化,只有通過(guò)溯源才能全面把握典故詞語(yǔ)的形式和意義。第三章為中晚唐墓志典故文化分析,首先從文化角度對(duì)中晚唐墓志男志主、女志主常用典故進(jìn)行類(lèi)析,發(fā)現(xiàn)典故詞語(yǔ)不同于其他熟語(yǔ)的特殊之處在于典故的運(yùn)用具有性別指向。然后對(duì)墓志人名用典進(jìn)行考察,擴(kuò)大了除傳世文獻(xiàn)外人名用典的范圍。第四章為中晚唐墓志典故用法類(lèi)型探究,通過(guò)墓志用典實(shí)例考察中晚唐墓志典故的用法類(lèi)型并對(duì)典故運(yùn)用效果進(jìn)行簡(jiǎn)單的評(píng)價(jià)。第五章為結(jié)語(yǔ),對(duì)文章整體研究的內(nèi)容、得出的結(jié)論和不足之處進(jìn)行闡述。
[Abstract]:From traditional allusions as rhetorical devices to Chinese words after the 20th century, academic research on allusions has never been interrupted. From the material point of view, the researchers mostly based on the handed-forward literature, epitaph materials have not been fully followed up. In recent years, scholars attach great importance to epitaph allusions, from Han, Wei and six dynasties to Sui and Tang dynasties, great progress has been made in the study of epitaph allusions. Based on the study of more than 600 epitaphs in the middle and late Tang Dynasty, this paper selects 194 epitaphs, which are relatively centralized and representative, and makes a multi-aspect investigation of the epitaph allusion in the process of arranging the epitaph allusions into tables. The main body of the article is divided into five parts: the first chapter is an introduction, mainly defines the concept of allusion, and analyzes the necessity of the use of allusion in epitaph. The second chapter is the study of the epitaph allusion words in the middle and late Tang Dynasty. The form and meaning of the allusions can be fully grasped only by tracing back to the source. The third chapter is the cultural analysis of the epitaph of the middle and late Tang Dynasty. Firstly, the author analyzes the common allusions of the male and female epitaphs from the perspective of culture, and finds that the idiosyncratic words differ from other idioms in that the use of allusions has gender orientation. Then the epitaph of the name of the investigation, expanding the scope of the use of other names in addition to the ancient literature. The fourth chapter explores the usage types of the epitaph of the middle and late Tang Dynasty, and makes a simple evaluation on the effect of the use of the epitaph through the examples of the epitaph use in the middle and late Tang Dynasty. The fifth chapter is the conclusion, the conclusion and the deficiency of the whole research.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：青島大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：H131;H15

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 管錫華;論典故詞語(yǔ)及其使用特點(diǎn)和釋義方法[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1995年01期

2 王光漢;;論典故的特殊修辭功用[J];安徽廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期

3 王光漢;關(guān)于典故溯源的再思考[J];古漢語(yǔ)研究;2000年04期

4 王建平;唐代科舉的社會(huì)功能[J];華南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年04期

5 譚桂聲;;人名用典略說(shuō)[J];漢字文化;2009年02期

6 潘萬(wàn)木;;典故與“興”[J];荊楚理工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年03期

7 郭蓉;;典故研究的理論與方法概談[J];理論月刊;2006年08期

8 亓文香;;漢語(yǔ)典故詞語(yǔ)的典源研究[J];臨沂師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年05期

9 徐志學(xué);;關(guān)于“典故”的思考[J];蘭州學(xué)刊;2010年10期

10 吳直雄;界定典故多歧義 《辭海》定義應(yīng)遵循——論典故的定義[J];南昌大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 章紅梅;漢魏六朝石刻典故詞研究[D];西南大學(xué);2006年

2 肖科見(jiàn);典故詞語(yǔ)意義研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2008年

3 趙黎明;唐天[婺曇淠怪鏡涔視么恃芯縖D];西南大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：2153441