本文選題：拉祜語 + 述補(bǔ)結(jié)構(gòu)��； 參考：《云南民族大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：述補(bǔ)結(jié)構(gòu)是對動(dòng)作行為以及認(rèn)知評(píng)價(jià)的一種表達(dá)形式。拉祜語中述補(bǔ)結(jié)構(gòu)使用頻率高，是極富有生命力的句法結(jié)構(gòu)之一。目前，對于拉祜語述補(bǔ)結(jié)構(gòu)尚未有系統(tǒng)地研究，但散見于簡志和一些論著中。本文在漢藏語系述補(bǔ)結(jié)構(gòu)研究基礎(chǔ)上，對拉祜語述補(bǔ)結(jié)構(gòu)進(jìn)行較為系統(tǒng)地描寫與分析，力求描寫解釋其語義、結(jié)構(gòu)類型，并指出其語法化來源及機(jī)制。 全文共分為五大部分。 “引言”主要介紹了拉祜語述補(bǔ)結(jié)構(gòu)研究現(xiàn)狀以及本文研究方法、語料來源、研究理論和研究意義。 第一、二章是文章的第二大部分，是關(guān)于拉祜語述補(bǔ)結(jié)構(gòu)語義的研究。第一章主要研究拉祜語述補(bǔ)結(jié)構(gòu)的語義類型。從語義角度，，拉祜語述補(bǔ)結(jié)構(gòu)可以分為述結(jié)式、述程式、述趨式、述狀式、可能式、述量式、“ɡa31”類述補(bǔ)結(jié)構(gòu)，共7類，各類各有其特點(diǎn)。每一個(gè)詞作補(bǔ)語時(shí)，充當(dāng)語義類型的能力也不盡相同，有的比較單一，有的一兼數(shù)類，而有些則可能與不同補(bǔ)語類型連用或嵌套。第二章則對拉祜語述補(bǔ)結(jié)構(gòu)的語義指向與配價(jià)進(jìn)行研究。補(bǔ)語語義指向，與述語的語義相關(guān)度有關(guān)。拉祜語述補(bǔ)結(jié)構(gòu)的價(jià)數(shù)有一價(jià)、二價(jià)、三價(jià)，但述補(bǔ)結(jié)構(gòu)的價(jià)數(shù)，與述語、補(bǔ)語的配價(jià)沒有必然的聯(lián)系，也不是二者配價(jià)之和。 第三章從結(jié)構(gòu)角度對拉祜語述補(bǔ)結(jié)構(gòu)進(jìn)行了研究。根據(jù)拉祜語述補(bǔ)結(jié)構(gòu)類型是否帶有補(bǔ)語標(biāo)記“ve33”，而分為粘著型和組合型兩種。兩種結(jié)構(gòu)類型分布不同，而且語義類型與結(jié)構(gòu)形式之間并沒有必然的搭配。同時(shí)，文章也分析了補(bǔ)語標(biāo)記“ve33”的功能。 第四章對拉祜語述補(bǔ)結(jié)構(gòu)中的語法化來源及其機(jī)制進(jìn)行了探討。補(bǔ)語的語法化是述補(bǔ)結(jié)構(gòu)豐富發(fā)展的重要方式。根據(jù)已有語料，述補(bǔ)結(jié)構(gòu)的來源可能是具有“動(dòng)作-結(jié)果”語義關(guān)系的連動(dòng)結(jié)構(gòu)。語法化的機(jī)制主要有重新分析、類推、隱喻和泛化等。但一個(gè)詞語虛化的誘因或機(jī)制是多方面的，在整個(gè)虛化過程中，不同階段發(fā)揮著不同的作用。 “結(jié)語”部分對全文拉祜語述補(bǔ)結(jié)構(gòu)進(jìn)行了全面梳理，并對各章節(jié)觀點(diǎn)加以概括。歸納了本文創(chuàng)新之處，對于研究不足之處進(jìn)行反思。
[Abstract]:Declarative complement structure is a form of expression of action behavior and cognitive evaluation. The frequent use of the predicate complement in the Lahu language is one of the most dynamic syntactic structures. At present, there is no systematic study on the predicate complement structure of Lahu language, but it is scattered in Jian Zhi and some works. On the basis of the research on the structure of narration and complement in Chinese and Tibetan languages, this paper makes a systematic description and analysis of the structure of the language of Lahu in order to describe and explain its semantics, types of structure, and points out its grammaticalization source and mechanism. The full text is divided into five parts. The introduction mainly introduces the present situation of the research on the predicate complement structure of Lahu language, the research methods, the source of the corpus, the research theory and the significance of the research. The first and second chapters are the second part of the thesis. The first chapter mainly studies the semantic types of predicate complement structure in Lahu language. From the semantic point of view, the predicate complement structure of Lahu language can be divided into seven types, namely, the resultant, the program, the cursive, the descriptive, the possible, the quantitative and the "A31". Each of them has its own characteristics. When each word is used as a complement, its ability to act as a semantic type is different, some of them are single, some may be combined with or nested with different complement types. The second chapter studies the semantic direction and valence of the predicate complement structure in Lahu language. The semantic direction of complement is related to the semantic relevance of the predicate. There are one price, two valence and three valence in the predicate complement structure of Lahu language, but the valence number of the narration complement structure is not necessarily related to the valence of the complement, nor is it the sum of the two prices. The third chapter studies the predicate complement structure of Lahu language from the perspective of structure. According to whether the type of predicate complement of Lahu language has the complement marker "ve33", it can be divided into two types: adhesive type and combined type. The distribution of the two structural types is different, and there is no necessary collocation between semantic types and structural forms. At the same time, the article also analyzes the function of complement marker "ve33". Chapter four discusses the grammaticalization source and its mechanism in the predicate complement structure of Lahu language. Grammaticalization of complement is an important way of rich development of complement structure. According to the existing corpus, the origin of the predicate complement structure may be the continuous structure with the semantic relation of "action-result". The mechanisms of grammaticalization include reanalysis, analogy, metaphor and generalization. However, the inducement or mechanism of a word's vanity is various, and different stages play different roles in the whole process. The conclusion summarizes the structure of the narration and complement of the Lahu language and summarizes the viewpoints of the chapters. Summarized the innovation of this paper, to reflect on the shortcomings of the research.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：云南民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：H258

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孫朝奮;《虛化論》評(píng)介[J];國外語言學(xué);1994年04期

2 沈家煊;實(shí)詞虛化的機(jī)制──《演化而來的語法》評(píng)介[J];當(dāng)代語言學(xué);1998年03期

3 吳福祥;南方方言幾個(gè)狀態(tài)補(bǔ)語標(biāo)記的來源(一)[J];方言;2001年04期

4 吳福祥;南方方言幾個(gè)狀態(tài)補(bǔ)語標(biāo)記的來源(二)[J];方言;2002年01期

5 游汝杰;補(bǔ)語的標(biāo)志“個(gè)”和“得”[J];漢語學(xué)習(xí);1983年03期

6 李臨定;究竟哪個(gè)“補(bǔ)”哪個(gè)?——“動(dòng)補(bǔ)”格關(guān)系再議[J];漢語學(xué)習(xí);1984年02期

7 張國憲;結(jié)果補(bǔ)語語義指向分析[J];漢語學(xué)習(xí);1988年04期

8 馬真,陸儉明;形容詞作結(jié)果補(bǔ)語情況考察(一)[J];漢語學(xué)習(xí);1997年01期

9 馬真,陸儉明;形容詞作結(jié)果補(bǔ)語情況考察(二)[J];漢語學(xué)習(xí);1997年04期

10 史有為;“好極了”、“好得很”之謎[J];漢語學(xué)習(xí);1994年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 李錦姬;現(xiàn)代漢語補(bǔ)語研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2003年

2 黎意;漢藏語述補(bǔ)結(jié)構(gòu)研究[D];中央民族大學(xué);2004年

3 �？≈�;元江苦聰話參考語法[D];中央民族大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李艷玲;壯語述補(bǔ)結(jié)構(gòu)研究[D];中央民族大學(xué);2009年

本文編號(hào)：1939354