本文選題：法庭話語 + 批評話語分析�。� 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：法庭話語是一種特殊的機(jī)構(gòu)話語，反映了庭審各主體之間由于社會地位、教育背景、法律知識、話語技巧等因素而產(chǎn)生的權(quán)力關(guān)系不對稱。近年來，隨著法律語言學(xué)的興起，很多學(xué)者將目光放在了法庭審判的語言活動上，但用語言學(xué)方法來系統(tǒng)描述庭審主體及其話語特征、言語行為和目的的研究仍然較為缺乏。國外研究雖有重要參考價值，但由于語言和法律體系的不同，并不能完全照搬。因此，本文在充分借鑒前人研究成功的基礎(chǔ)上，從批評話語分析的角度，通過分析微觀的法庭話語的語言細(xì)節(jié)，描述了中國庭審各主體的話語權(quán)力和話語策略，試圖揭示其背后隱藏的權(quán)力關(guān)系和意識形態(tài)，并對中國司法改革提出相應(yīng)的建議。 本文根據(jù)批評話語分析的基本原則和方法論，通過分析八場法庭審判（四場刑事、四場民事）中的語料，發(fā)現(xiàn)庭審中的權(quán)勢主體（法官、檢察官、律師）由于具備較高的社會地位及豐富的法律知識，，總是試圖對法庭話語的話題和進(jìn)程進(jìn)行控制，以達(dá)到自己的話語目的；同時，庭審中的弱勢主體（原告、被告、證人）并非對此無能為力，通過合適的話語策略，弱勢者能夠抵制強(qiáng)勢者的話語控制，并且嘗試在某種程度上對法庭話語進(jìn)行控制。因此，庭審各主體間不對稱的權(quán)力關(guān)系是通過法庭話語來實(shí)現(xiàn)和維護(hù)的，而這一不對稱的權(quán)力關(guān)系又反過來影響法庭話語的內(nèi)容和方式。 在中國的司法改革進(jìn)程中，法庭話語是實(shí)現(xiàn)司法正義不可或缺的一環(huán)；因此，從微觀話語細(xì)節(jié)來分析和揭示我國法庭審判的模式和現(xiàn)狀是很有必有的。從語言學(xué)角度了解和認(rèn)識到隱藏在法庭話語背后的意識形態(tài)及權(quán)力關(guān)系，就為提出相應(yīng)的司法改革建議并最終實(shí)現(xiàn)司法正義，提供了切實(shí)可行的前提和基礎(chǔ)。
[Abstract]:Court discourse is a special kind of institutional discourse, which reflects the asymmetry of power relations between the subjects of trial due to social status, educational background, legal knowledge, discourse skills and so on. In recent years, with the rise of forensic linguistics, many scholars have focused on the language activities of court trial, but the linguistic method is used to systematically describe the trial subject and its discourse characteristics, and the study of speech act and purpose is still lacking. Although the study abroad has important reference value, it can not be completely copied because of the difference of language and legal system. Therefore, on the basis of the success of previous studies, this paper, from the perspective of critical discourse analysis, describes the discourse power and discourse strategy of Chinese trial subjects by analyzing the language details of microcosmic court discourse. This paper tries to reveal the hidden power relationship and ideology behind it, and puts forward corresponding suggestions to China's judicial reform. According to the basic principles and methodology of critical discourse analysis, this paper analyzes the corpus of eight court trials (four criminal, four civil), and finds out the powerful subjects (judges, prosecutors) in the trial. Because of their high social status and rich legal knowledge, they always try to control the topic and process of the court discourse in order to achieve their own purpose; at the same time, the vulnerable subjects in the trial (plaintiff, defendant, Witness) is not powerless, through the appropriate discourse strategy, the weak can resist the strong discourse control, and try to control the court discourse to some extent. Therefore, the asymmetric power relationship among the subjects in the trial is realized and maintained through the court discourse, which in turn affects the content and the way of the court discourse. In the process of judicial reform in China, court discourse is an indispensable part in the realization of judicial justice; therefore, it is necessary to analyze and reveal the pattern and present situation of court trial in China from the micro discourse details. Understanding and recognizing the ideology and power relationship hidden behind the court discourse from the linguistic point of view provides a practical premise and foundation for putting forward the corresponding judicial reform proposals and finally realizing the judicial justice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D926.2;H136

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 苗興偉;;語篇分析的進(jìn)展與前沿[J];外語學(xué)刊;2006年01期

2 辛斌;;批評話語分析:批評與反思[J];外語學(xué)刊;2008年06期

3 辛斌;批評性語篇分析:問題與討論[J];外國語(上海外國語大學(xué)學(xué)報);2004年05期

本文編號：1921682