規(guī)范性和抽象性對(duì)隱喻理解的影響
本文關(guān)鍵詞:規(guī)范性和抽象性對(duì)隱喻理解的影響 出處:《河南大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文 論文類(lèi)型:學(xué)位論文
更多相關(guān)文章: 隱喻理解 隱喻生涯理論 規(guī)范性 抽象性 語(yǔ)法性
【摘要】:傳統(tǒng)意義上通常把隱喻看作一種修辭方式,到了20世紀(jì)80年代,隱喻研究的重點(diǎn)逐漸從修辭研究轉(zhuǎn)向了認(rèn)知研究。本文首先對(duì)隱喻的相關(guān)概念進(jìn)行了界定,認(rèn)為隱喻是兩類(lèi)事物之間的映射,通過(guò)一類(lèi)具體的、已知事物認(rèn)識(shí)和理解另一種抽象的、未知事物;隱喻理解的認(rèn)知策略是隱喻研究的一個(gè)重要方面,其代表性理論主要有四種:比較理論、類(lèi)概念形成理論、結(jié)構(gòu)映射理論、隱喻生涯理論。這些理論解釋了隱喻認(rèn)知機(jī)制的發(fā)展,其中隱喻生涯理論有效的整合了比較理論和類(lèi)概念形成理論存在的分歧。在這些理論的基礎(chǔ)上,一些學(xué)者對(duì)影響隱喻理解過(guò)程的因素進(jìn)行了探討,研究發(fā)現(xiàn)影響隱喻理解的因素比較多,如規(guī)范性、抽象性、語(yǔ)境、語(yǔ)法形式等,不同學(xué)者對(duì)于隱喻理解的影響因素存在不同觀(guān)點(diǎn),本文利用眼動(dòng)技術(shù),針對(duì)以往研究中存在的分歧,選取規(guī)范性、抽象性、語(yǔ)法形式這三個(gè)主要因素對(duì)隱喻理解過(guò)程進(jìn)行深入探討;陔[喻的研究現(xiàn)狀,本論文有兩個(gè)研究目的。(1)檢驗(yàn)隱喻生涯理論是否在中文背景下也適用,探究隱喻句子的規(guī)范性和目標(biāo)項(xiàng)的抽象性對(duì)比喻句子語(yǔ)法偏好性的影響。(2)探究規(guī)范性水平、抽象性水平以及語(yǔ)法形式對(duì)隱喻理解的影響。為了驗(yàn)證以上目的,本研究設(shè)計(jì)了兩個(gè)實(shí)驗(yàn),探究規(guī)范性和抽象性對(duì)隱喻理解的影響。實(shí)驗(yàn)一考察了隱喻生涯理論在漢語(yǔ)隱喻理解過(guò)程中是否適用,分析了規(guī)范性和抽象性對(duì)比喻句子語(yǔ)法偏好性的影響,結(jié)果證實(shí)了在中文背景下,規(guī)范性水平影響比喻句子的偏好選擇。實(shí)驗(yàn)二在實(shí)驗(yàn)一的基礎(chǔ)上,選擇規(guī)范性、抽象性以及語(yǔ)法形式這三個(gè)重要因素對(duì)隱喻過(guò)程做重點(diǎn)探究,利用眼動(dòng)儀分析不同類(lèi)型的隱喻句在理解過(guò)程中存在的具體差異。實(shí)驗(yàn)結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn),規(guī)范性、抽象性以及語(yǔ)法形式都是影響隱喻理解過(guò)程的因素,這些因素對(duì)隱喻理解過(guò)程都有不同程度的影響,該探究對(duì)于深入了解隱喻的理解過(guò)程有一定的推動(dòng)作用。本研究得出如下結(jié)論:1、在中文背景下,隱喻生涯理論依然適用。2、在語(yǔ)法偏好上,規(guī)范性水平低的比喻句子更偏好明喻(即比較形式),規(guī)范性水平高的比喻句子更偏好隱喻(即歸類(lèi)形式)。3、影響隱喻理解的主要因素是規(guī)范性水平,抽象性水平和語(yǔ)法形式。4、規(guī)范性因素對(duì)比喻句子的影響不僅反映在早期加工階段,也反映在晚期加工階段。5、抽象性因素對(duì)比喻句子的影響不僅反映在早期加工階段,也反映在晚期加工階段。6、語(yǔ)法性因素對(duì)比喻句子的影響并沒(méi)有反映在早期加工階段,而是反映在晚期加工階段。7、標(biāo)準(zhǔn)隱喻句中的目標(biāo)項(xiàng)和基礎(chǔ)項(xiàng)對(duì)隱喻理解過(guò)程的差異不僅表現(xiàn)在早期加工過(guò)程,也表現(xiàn)在晚期加工階段。
[Abstract]:The traditional sense usually regard metaphor as a rhetoric way, by 1980s, the focus of metaphor research gradually from rhetoric research to cognitive research. Firstly, define the concept of metaphor, metaphor is the mapping between the two types of things, by a specific class, the known knowledge and understanding of another abstract, unknown; cognitive strategies of metaphor comprehension is an important aspect of the study of metaphor, the representative theory mainly has four kinds: comparison theory, concept formation theory, structure mapping theory, metaphor theory. These theories explain the career development of the cognitive mechanism of metaphor, the metaphor of the effective integration of the career theory comparison of theory and concept formation theory differences. On the basis of these theories, some scholars discussed the influence factors of metaphor comprehension, study of the influence of metaphor Understanding the factors, such as normative, abstraction, context, grammatical forms, different scholars have different views on the factors affecting the comprehension of metaphor, this paper using eye movement technology, according to existing differences, selection of normative, abstract, the three main factors of grammatical form process of metaphor to understand the research status. Based on metaphor, this thesis has two research purposes. (1) test whether in Chinese metaphor career theory under the background of metaphor sentences also applies normative and target abstraction of metaphor sentence grammar preference. (2) to explore the normative level, influence of abstraction the level and form of grammatical metaphor understanding. In order to verify the above purpose, this study designed two experiments to explore the impact of specification and abstraction of metaphor understanding. Experiment 1 investigated the metaphor theory in the Chinese implicit career Whether in the process of understanding metaphor application, analyzes the influence of specification and abstraction of metaphorical sentence grammar preference, the results were confirmed in Chinese background, influence of normative level metaphor sentence preference in experiment two. On the basis of experiment, choose the standard, the three important factors of abstraction and grammatical form key research on Metaphor analysis process, different types of metaphor sentences in understanding existing in the process of using eye tracker. The experimental results show that the normative, abstract and grammatical forms are metaphor understanding process factors, these factors have different effects on metaphor comprehension process, the research has certain to promote in-depth understanding of metaphor understanding process. The conclusions are as follows: 1, in the Chinese context, metaphor career theory still applies.2 in grammatical preferences, the normative level is low The metaphor of sentence preference (i.e. comparison), simile metaphor sentences normative high level of preference for metaphor (i.e. classified form).3, the main factors affecting the comprehension of metaphor is the normative level, the level of abstraction of grammatical forms and.4, normative factors on the influence of metaphor sentences is reflected not only in the early stages of processing. Is also reflected in the late stage processing of.5, influence of the abstract factors on metaphor sentences is reflected not only in the early stages of processing, is also reflected in the late stage processing.6, influence factors on the sentence grammar metaphor is not reflected in the early stage, but in late stage processing of.7, and the target based on metaphor understanding process the difference between the standard of metaphor is not only reflected in the early process, but also in the late stage of processing.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:河南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:H0-05
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 肖蔚;隱喻的認(rèn)知與思維方式及隱喻理解[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年05期
2 杜學(xué)鑫;張文鵬;;從施喻者角度看隱喻意義構(gòu)建和隱喻理解[J];電子科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社科版);2007年03期
3 岳娟;;語(yǔ)境對(duì)隱喻理解的作用[J];安徽文學(xué)(下半月);2010年01期
4 李運(yùn)華;;小學(xué)兒童隱喻理解特征[J];嘉應(yīng)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年04期
5 蘇嵐;;想象性經(jīng)歷特點(diǎn)下語(yǔ)境對(duì)隱喻理解的影響[J];南昌教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年07期
6 胡建偉;;隱喻理解的語(yǔ)言及認(rèn)知角度分析[J];安徽工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年05期
7 唐世民;;隱喻理解,概念隱喻理論還是范疇包容模型?[J];常州工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社科版);2012年05期
8 唐世民;;隱喻喻體所指與隱喻理解[J];廣東外語(yǔ)外貿(mào)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2013年04期
9 陳治安,蔣光友;隱喻理論與隱喻理解[J];西南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1999年02期
10 龔玉苗;孫毅;;國(guó)外隱喻理解半球效應(yīng)研究述評(píng)[J];外語(yǔ)研究;2014年02期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前3條
1 沈秋鳳;丁峻;;具身視域下情緒啟動(dòng)對(duì)隱喻理解影響的模型[A];第十二屆全國(guó)心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)大會(huì)論文摘要集[C];2009年
2 蒲松齡;;隱喻構(gòu)建基本要素及其與隱喻理解效果的關(guān)系[A];福建省外國(guó)語(yǔ)文學(xué)會(huì)2006年年會(huì)暨學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集(上)[C];2006年
3 鄭艷霞;;隱喻的認(rèn)知闡釋[A];第四屆全國(guó)認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)研討會(huì)論文摘要匯編[C];2006年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 許群;隱喻理解中的常規(guī)性和適宜性研究[D];電子科技大學(xué);2011年
2 鄒夢(mèng)雨;2-6歲兒童隱喻理解能力發(fā)展研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2012年
3 張艷芳;規(guī)范性和抽象性對(duì)隱喻理解的影響[D];河南大學(xué);2015年
4 孫濤;從文化角度談隱喻理解[D];哈爾濱工程大學(xué);2004年
5 岳娟;用關(guān)聯(lián)理論闡述認(rèn)知語(yǔ)境對(duì)隱喻理解的作用[D];南昌大學(xué);2011年
6 白鋒宇;兒童對(duì)隱喻的意義理解及其隱喻理解認(rèn)知過(guò)程分析[D];華東師范大學(xué);2008年
7 梁醒君;抑制和強(qiáng)化機(jī)制對(duì)漢語(yǔ)隱喻理解的作用[D];華南師范大學(xué);2007年
8 陳琛;面向隱喻理解的認(rèn)知屬性知識(shí)庫(kù)[D];上海外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué);2012年
9 馬玉俊;隱喻理解加工策略的選擇機(jī)制[D];河南大學(xué);2009年
10 趙艷麗;漢英雙語(yǔ)者大腦隱喻理解的事件關(guān)聯(lián)電位研究[D];大連理工大學(xué);2010年
,本文編號(hào):1415060
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/1415060.html