本文關(guān)鍵詞：不同類型漢語(yǔ)因果句加工的反應(yīng)時(shí)研究　出處：《四川外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 漢語(yǔ)因果句 邏輯因果句 實(shí)據(jù)因果句 反應(yīng)時(shí) 因果句識(shí)解機(jī)理

【摘要】：因果關(guān)系是世界上事物之間最基本的關(guān)系之一,而因果句則是通過(guò)語(yǔ)言來(lái)表達(dá)這一關(guān)系的最常見(jiàn)的方式。盡管漢語(yǔ)因果句具有多種表達(dá)方式,但是最為典型的漢語(yǔ)因果句則是通過(guò)“因?yàn)椤浴边@一結(jié)構(gòu)構(gòu)成的。雖然大多語(yǔ)用學(xué)和認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)角度的理論研究對(duì)因果句進(jìn)行了分類,但是它們都缺少實(shí)證的證據(jù)來(lái)證明不同類型的因果句在加工上存在差異。認(rèn)知神經(jīng)語(yǔ)言學(xué)角度的研究,幾乎都沒(méi)有涉及到不同類型因果句的加工在反應(yīng)時(shí)上的差異,并且迄今還沒(méi)有從這一角度研究漢語(yǔ)因果句的文章。廖巧云(2011)探討了邏輯因果構(gòu)式和實(shí)據(jù)因果構(gòu)式的識(shí)解機(jī)理,但仍然沒(méi)有實(shí)證的證據(jù)來(lái)支撐其提出的識(shí)解機(jī)理。因此,本研究試圖研究三種不同類型的漢語(yǔ)因果句(邏輯因果句,無(wú)標(biāo)識(shí)語(yǔ)的實(shí)據(jù)因果句和有標(biāo)識(shí)語(yǔ)的實(shí)據(jù)因果句)的加工在反應(yīng)時(shí)上的差異,并進(jìn)一步驗(yàn)證廖巧云所提出的因果句的識(shí)解機(jī)理。本研究提出了兩個(gè)研究問(wèn)題:1)三種不同類型的漢語(yǔ)因果句(邏輯因果句,無(wú)標(biāo)識(shí)語(yǔ)的實(shí)據(jù)因果句和有標(biāo)識(shí)語(yǔ)的實(shí)據(jù)因果句)的加工在反應(yīng)時(shí)上是否存在差異?2)廖巧云(2011)提出的因果句的識(shí)解機(jī)理是否合理?本研究采用行為實(shí)驗(yàn)的范式。實(shí)驗(yàn)材料由25組因果句構(gòu)成,其中包含3組在正式實(shí)驗(yàn)前的練習(xí)模式中使用的材料。每一組因果句都包含一個(gè)邏輯因果句,一個(gè)無(wú)標(biāo)識(shí)語(yǔ)的實(shí)據(jù)因果句,一個(gè)有標(biāo)識(shí)語(yǔ)的實(shí)據(jù)因果句和一個(gè)假因果句。所有因果句的長(zhǎng)度都被控制在14-20個(gè)字之間。30名來(lái)自四川外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)研究生院的碩士研究生參加了本次實(shí)驗(yàn)。在實(shí)驗(yàn)中,所有的句子都是隨機(jī)呈現(xiàn)給被試。然后,在5000 ms后,句子將自動(dòng)消失。緊接著,屏幕上將出現(xiàn)一個(gè)等級(jí)量表。被試被要求在看到等級(jí)量表后盡快根據(jù)該表做出相應(yīng)的反應(yīng)。被試需要判斷所呈現(xiàn)的句子是否可以被接受,然后根據(jù)等級(jí)量表的提示按電腦鍵盤上相應(yīng)的按鍵。本研究在對(duì)實(shí)驗(yàn)數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行分析后,結(jié)果顯示:(1)邏輯因果句和無(wú)標(biāo)識(shí)語(yǔ)的實(shí)據(jù)因果句在加工反應(yīng)時(shí)上存在顯著差異(t=-2.912,p=0.008)。邏輯因果句的平均反應(yīng)時(shí)(m=828.85 ms)比無(wú)標(biāo)識(shí)語(yǔ)的實(shí)據(jù)因果句的平均反應(yīng)時(shí)(m=1108.97 ms)要短得多。(2)無(wú)標(biāo)識(shí)語(yǔ)的實(shí)據(jù)因果句和有標(biāo)識(shí)語(yǔ)的實(shí)據(jù)因果句在加工反應(yīng)時(shí)上存在顯著差異(t=-2.212,p=0.031)。無(wú)標(biāo)識(shí)語(yǔ)的實(shí)據(jù)因果句的平均反應(yīng)時(shí)(m=1108.97 ms)比有標(biāo)識(shí)語(yǔ)的實(shí)據(jù)因果句的平均反應(yīng)時(shí)(m=730.42 ms)要長(zhǎng)得多。(3)雖然邏輯因果句的平均反應(yīng)時(shí)(m=828.85ms)比有標(biāo)識(shí)語(yǔ)的實(shí)據(jù)因果句的平均反應(yīng)時(shí)(m=730.42 ms)略長(zhǎng),但是根據(jù)配對(duì)樣本t檢驗(yàn)的結(jié)果(t=-0.791,p=0.264)來(lái)看,兩種因果句在加工反應(yīng)時(shí)上并沒(méi)有顯著的差異。根據(jù)實(shí)驗(yàn)的數(shù)據(jù),本研究得出了如下兩點(diǎn)結(jié)論:(1)三種不同類型的漢語(yǔ)因果句在加工反應(yīng)時(shí)上存在差異。邏輯因果句的加工反應(yīng)時(shí)比實(shí)據(jù)因果句的加工反應(yīng)時(shí)短。但實(shí)據(jù)因果句中的標(biāo)識(shí)語(yǔ)有利于對(duì)實(shí)據(jù)因果句的識(shí)解,因而能縮短實(shí)據(jù)因果句的加工反應(yīng)時(shí)。(2)本研究結(jié)果證實(shí)了廖巧云(2011)提出的因果句的識(shí)解機(jī)理的合理性。
[Abstract]:The causal relationship is one of the most basic relations between things in the world, and the causal sentence is expressed by means of language. This relationship is the most common way. Although the Chinese sentence has a variety of causal expression, but the most typical Chinese sentence is through "because causality. So." constitute the structure. Although most of theoretical research on pragmatics and cognitive linguistics perspective classify the causal sentence, but they are lack of empirical evidence to show that different types of causal sentences in processing differences. Research on neuro cognitive linguistics, almost did not involve differences between different types of causal sentence processing on the reaction time, and yet from the Perspective of Chinese causal sentences articles. Liao Qiaoyun (2011) discusses the logic of causal constructions and causal evidence structure construal mechanism, but there is still no empirical evidence Support the construal mechanism. Therefore, this research attempts to study three different types of Chinese causal sentences (logical causal sentences, no signs of evidentiality and causal sentences signs evidence causal sentence) difference processing in the reaction time, and further verify the construal mechanism provided by causal sentences Liao Qiaoyun. This study proposes two research questions: 1) three different types of Chinese causal sentences (logical causal sentences, no signs of evidentiality and causal sentences signs evidence causal sentence) whether the reaction time of different processing? 2) Liao Qiaoyun (2011) proposed causal sentences the construal mechanism is reasonable? This study adopts behavioral experiment paradigm. Experimental material is composed of 25 groups of causal sentences which contain 3 groups, used in the first experiment practice mode of materials. Each group of causal sentence contains a causal sentence, a logo According to effect word, a logo and a false evidence of causal sentences. All causal sentences of causal sentences are controlled in length between the 14-20 word.30 from Sichuan foreign language university graduate school graduate students participated in the experiment. In the experiment, all the sentences are presented randomly to the subjects. Then, in 5000 ms, the sentence will automatically disappear. Then, will appear on the screen of a rating scale. The subjects were asked to see a scale as soon as possible according to the corresponding response table. The subjects need to determine whether the sentence can be accepted, then according to the rating table press the corresponding button on the computer keyboard. The results of this study show that in the analysis of the experimental data, (1): the logic of causal sentences and non causal evidence signs in processing reaction time has significant difference (t=-2.912, p=0.008). The logic of causal sentences The average response time (m=828.85 MS) than evidence of causal sentences mean reaction without signs when (m=1108.97 MS) is much shorter. (2) no signs of evidentiality and causal sentences signs evidence causation sentence in the processing reaction time there was significant difference (t=-2.212, p=0.031). No evidence of causal sentences the average response mark language (m=1108.97 MS) than when evidence of causal sentences average response signs when (m=730.42 MS) is much longer. (3) although the average reaction logic of causal sentences when (m=828.85ms) than the average response is evidence of causal sentence signs when (m=730.42 MS) slightly long, but according to the paired sample t test results (t=-0.791, p=0.264), two kinds of causation sentence in the processing reaction time did not significantly differ. According to the experimental data, this study draws the following conclusions: (1) three Chinese cause different types of sentences in the processing reaction time difference ISO. Logic processing reactions of causal sentences than the evidence processing reaction of causal sentences short. But the evidence in causal sentences logo is conducive to the evidence of causation sentence construal, which can shorten the processing time. The reaction confirms causal sentences (2) the results of this study confirmed that Liao Qiaoyun (2011) proposed a causal sentences the general solution of the rationality of mechanism.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：H146.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馮渭宏;對(duì)男子400m起跑反應(yīng)時(shí)及分段速度的縱向研究[J];體育科技文獻(xiàn)通報(bào);2005年09期

2 馮淑丹;劉景霞;;反應(yīng)時(shí)分析新方法探析[J];濮陽(yáng)職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年01期

3 肖幼云;許東華;;視覺(jué)運(yùn)動(dòng)反應(yīng)時(shí)與學(xué)生學(xué)業(yè)成績(jī)的關(guān)系[J];中國(guó)校醫(yī);1988年02期

4 肖幼云;許東華;;視覺(jué)運(yùn)動(dòng)反應(yīng)時(shí)與小學(xué)生課業(yè)成績(jī)關(guān)系的探討[J];學(xué)校衛(wèi)生;1989年02期

5 裴劍濤,何存道;駕駛員的動(dòng)態(tài)反應(yīng)時(shí)研究[J];心理科學(xué);1993年05期

6 郭可教，，雷慶文，羅敏;學(xué)生智力與反應(yīng)時(shí)的關(guān)系的教育神經(jīng)心理學(xué)研究[J];心理科學(xué);1995年03期

7 朱柯蓓;電大學(xué)生反應(yīng)時(shí)的測(cè)定及分析[J];曲靖師專學(xué)報(bào);1997年06期

8 周強(qiáng),胡瑜;反應(yīng)時(shí)方法的新進(jìn)展[J];心理科學(xué);2004年02期

9 李曉溪;;心理疲勞對(duì)反應(yīng)時(shí)影響的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[J];人類工效學(xué);2010年04期

10 羅春榮;;反應(yīng)時(shí)實(shí)驗(yàn)對(duì)心理學(xué)發(fā)展的貢獻(xiàn)及其缺陷[J];心理學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);1989年02期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 王建華;秦金環(huán);周秀草;陰國(guó)恩;;7—12歲兒童反應(yīng)時(shí)的測(cè)試研究[A];全國(guó)第六屆心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議文摘選集[C];1987年

2 劉鵬;李曉霞;;基于自行研制無(wú)線裝置的運(yùn)動(dòng)反應(yīng)時(shí)測(cè)量與分析[A];第九屆全國(guó)體育科學(xué)大會(huì)論文摘要匯編(4)[C];2011年

3 常建芳;侯杰泰;;當(dāng)反應(yīng)時(shí)數(shù)據(jù)呈非正態(tài)分布:方法的進(jìn)展[A];增強(qiáng)心理學(xué)服務(wù)社會(huì)的意識(shí)和功能——中國(guó)心理學(xué)會(huì)成立90周年紀(jì)念大會(huì)暨第十四屆全國(guó)心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文摘要集[C];2011年

4 王奰;管益杰;張立榮;賀晨曦;;品牌滿意度、品牌情感偏好的反應(yīng)時(shí)指標(biāo)研究[A];第十一屆全國(guó)心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文摘要集[C];2007年

5 李曉溪;;心理疲勞對(duì)反應(yīng)時(shí)影響的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[A];創(chuàng)新沈陽(yáng)文集（B）[C];2009年

6 劉友誼;張林軍;舒華;;字詞的起始音素對(duì)命名反應(yīng)時(shí)記錄的影響[A];第十屆全國(guó)心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)大會(huì)論文摘要集[C];2005年

7 陳峰;吳依雪;郭瓊珠;;不同難度刺激條件的反應(yīng)時(shí)分析[A];中國(guó)科協(xié)2005年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)體育科學(xué)分會(huì)場(chǎng)論文摘要匯編[C];2005年

8 吳志平;吳振云;孫長(zhǎng)華;許淑蓮;;成年人視覺(jué)搜索反應(yīng)時(shí)的年齡差異[A];第八屆全國(guó)心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議文摘選集[C];1997年

9 向勇;胡雪松;王棟;;用于精神運(yùn)動(dòng)測(cè)驗(yàn)的多功能反應(yīng)時(shí)測(cè)試儀[A];1995年中國(guó)智能自動(dòng)化學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議暨智能自動(dòng)化專業(yè)委員會(huì)成立大會(huì)論文集（下冊(cè)）[C];1995年

10 龔銘新;張磊;董菲;鄒凝祥;王樂(lè)軍;;基于無(wú)線組網(wǎng)技術(shù)的擊劍反應(yīng)時(shí)測(cè)試訓(xùn)練信息系統(tǒng)研究與開(kāi)發(fā)[A];第十六屆全國(guó)運(yùn)動(dòng)生物力學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)交流大會(huì)（CABS 2013）論文集[C];2013年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 黎奎德;大腦反應(yīng)時(shí)與安全生產(chǎn)的關(guān)系[N];中國(guó)礦業(yè)報(bào);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 周偉;多功能人機(jī)反應(yīng)時(shí)測(cè)試裝置的研制與應(yīng)用[D];哈爾濱理工大學(xué);2015年

2 鄧堅(jiān);男女大學(xué)生在閾下重復(fù)情緒啟動(dòng)條件下的反應(yīng)時(shí)差異研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2011年

3 趙永恒;不同類型漢語(yǔ)因果句加工的反應(yīng)時(shí)研究[D];四川外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué);2015年

4 李靖;7-11歲學(xué)齡兒童警覺(jué)水平的研究[D];浙江大學(xué);1999年

5 袁媛;收集基礎(chǔ)反應(yīng)時(shí)是啟動(dòng)實(shí)驗(yàn)不可或缺的步驟[D];廣東外語(yǔ)外貿(mào)大學(xué);2006年

6 張淑敏;IRT計(jì)時(shí)模型的參數(shù)估計(jì)及其研究[D];江西師范大學(xué);2006年

7 黃玲玲;核心情感存在合理性的實(shí)證研究[D];信陽(yáng)師范學(xué)院;2011年

8 戚敏;靶線索特異性對(duì)基于事件前瞻記憶的影響[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

9 周菁菁;刺激信號(hào)為圖案的人體反應(yīng)時(shí)測(cè)試儀的設(shè)計(jì)[D];南昌大學(xué);2009年

10 白若陽(yáng);注意水平、任務(wù)重要性、情緒效價(jià)對(duì)前瞻記憶的影響[D];河南大學(xué);2012年

本文編號(hào)：1392788