分判與會通：中西意象理論的對話
發(fā)布時間：2019-05-22 14:28
【摘要】：本文選取具有普適性價值的“意象”范疇進(jìn)行中西詩學(xué)的分判與會通。這一理論探討,在著眼于完善中西比較詩學(xué)理論體系的同時,重在探求中國真正具有現(xiàn)代性特質(zhì)的文論發(fā)展道路。 本文既承認(rèn)中西意象理論各自的特異性,又尋求二者之間的融通。從本質(zhì)上講,中西比較詩學(xué)研究本身就意在解決求同存異的難題。因此,本文不追求術(shù)語的絕對對應(yīng)或機械等同,而遵照中西意象理論的本來面貌進(jìn)行言述,進(jìn)行求同存異的探討。一方面在對特異性的體察中找到宏觀的會通之點,另一方面發(fā)現(xiàn)雙方在可會通之點所體現(xiàn)出的具體方式。本文擬從哲學(xué)源起、詩學(xué)展開、自我超越三個方面展開中西意象理論的分判與會通。 文章首先在致“善”途徑、“天人合一”的方式、生存理想的建構(gòu)三個方面對哲學(xué)層面的中西“象”論作異中有同、同中有異的辨析。從哲學(xué)之“象”到“審美意象”,中西意象理論沿著不同理路展開。中國傳統(tǒng)意象理論依循自然之道達(dá)成有限生命的無限開拓;西方意象理論有一個揮之不去的神學(xué)基底,充滿著神明造物般的創(chuàng)造熱情,在主體性的不斷放大中尋求經(jīng)驗個體對超驗本體的無限趨近。 盡管中西“意象”理論差異顯著,但是兩者未嘗不可有互補短長之處。以縝密的思辨性見長的西學(xué)話語對于以直覺體悟為主而缺乏范疇界定與區(qū)分的中國詩學(xué)來說是合理的師習(xí)對象;而中國詩學(xué)思維方式和話語模式所成就的蘊藉深遠(yuǎn)、“心物為一”的“意象”為無法擺脫主客二元對峙、經(jīng)驗與超驗分裂的西方意象理論所可望而難及。因此,在透析兩者所遭遇的話語困境之后,本文展示了中西意象理論在“會通”的向度上以自我超越為目的的具體努力。英美意象派詩論以西學(xué)傳統(tǒng)為基點,借源中國古典詩學(xué),開創(chuàng)了西方現(xiàn)代詩壇新風(fēng)。這一東學(xué)西漸意味著中國傳統(tǒng)詩學(xué)第一次實現(xiàn)了跨越國界的影響,而意象派所體現(xiàn)出的理論勇氣和治學(xué)心態(tài)對于中國現(xiàn)代詩學(xué)的建構(gòu)來說頗值得借鑒�？肆_齊直覺主義立場的意象理論是對西方詩學(xué)深刻反思的結(jié)晶,其為維護意象整一性所作的理論開拓,在某種程度上與中國詩學(xué)中對“意象”理想審美形態(tài)的建構(gòu)頗有相通之處。而中國傳統(tǒng)意象理論經(jīng)由“象”到“境”的升華創(chuàng)締造了作為最高理想的“至境意象”。 本文關(guān)于中西意象理論分判與會通的實踐,一方面力圖還原中國傳統(tǒng)文論本原的言說方式,盡量避免中國現(xiàn)代文論研究中的西學(xué)思維模式慣性的干擾,力圖體現(xiàn)中西詩學(xué)之間的平等對話。另一方面在中西詩學(xué)異質(zhì)性與可通約性的比較中,借以明確中國現(xiàn)代文論建構(gòu)應(yīng)有的定位方式,尋求中國特色的文論新的發(fā)展契機。
[Abstract]:This paper chooses the "image" category with universal value to carry on the separation and association of Chinese and Western poetics. This paper discusses the development of the literary theory with the characteristics of modernity, while focusing on the improvement of the theoretical system of the western comparative poetics. This paper not only recognizes the specific characteristics of the Chinese and Western image theories, but also seeks the fusion between the two. In essence, the study of the comparative poetics of the Chinese and the western is to solve the difficulty of seeking the same Therefore, the article does not pursue the absolute correspondence or the mechanical equivalent of the term, and according to the original face of the Chinese and Western image theory, carry on the exploration of the same. On the one hand, on the one hand, we find the point of the macro-way in the specific body-examination, and on the other hand, we find the specific party that the two sides embody at the point of the meeting. In this paper, it is proposed that the Chinese and Western image theory should be divided into three aspects: the source of philosophy, the development of the poetics and the self-transcendence. On the other hand, the paper first, on the three aspects of "the way of good", "the unity of man and nature", and the construction of the ideal of existence, is the same as that of the "Chinese and Western image of the philosophy level", and the same is different from the other. From the "image" of philosophy to the "aesthetic image", the theory of Chinese and Western images along different lines The traditional image theory of China follows the natural way to achieve the unlimited development of the limited life; the western image theory has a theological base which can not be used, which is full of the creation enthusiasm of the deity creation, and the non-existence of the transcendental body is sought in the continuous enlargement of the subjectivity. In spite of the significant difference in the Chinese and Western "image" theory, both of them have not tasted the same. The short length of Chinese poetics is a rational study object for Chinese poetics, which is based on intuition and lack of category definition and differentiation, and the achievement of the mode of thinking and discourse of Chinese poetics. The image of the western image that can't get rid of the dualistic confrontation, the experience and the transcendental division of the main guest is the image of a "image" that can't get rid of the dualistic confrontation, experience and transcendental division of the main guest. It is expected to be difficult and difficult. Therefore, after the discourse dilemma of both dialysis, this paper presents the purpose of the Chinese and Western image theory to self-transcendence on the degree of the "Huitong". The concrete efforts of the British and American Imagism are based on the traditional Chinese classical poetics, and created the West. This is the first time that the Chinese traditional poetics has realized the influence of the national boundaries, and the theoretical courage and the theory of the Chinese traditional poetics embody the construction of the Chinese modern poetics. It is worth to draw for reference. The image theory of the position of the intuitionism of the west is the crystallization of the deep reflection of the western poetics, which is the theoretical development of maintaining the unity of the image. In a way, the construction of the ideal aesthetic form of the "image" in the Chinese poetics is somewhat different from that of the Chinese poetics. The traditional image theory of China has created the "to the image of the environment" as the highest ideal through the sublimation of the "image" to the "context". The paper, on the one hand, tries to reduce the interference of the inertia of the western mode of thinking in the study of the Chinese traditional literary theory, and tries to reflect the Chinese and Western poetics. On the other hand, on the other hand, in the comparison of the heterogeneity of Chinese and Western poetics and the accessibility of Chinese and Western poetics, it is clear that the Chinese modern literary theory should be constructed with the positioning method, and seek the text of Chinese characteristics
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：I01
本文編號：2483008
[Abstract]:This paper chooses the "image" category with universal value to carry on the separation and association of Chinese and Western poetics. This paper discusses the development of the literary theory with the characteristics of modernity, while focusing on the improvement of the theoretical system of the western comparative poetics. This paper not only recognizes the specific characteristics of the Chinese and Western image theories, but also seeks the fusion between the two. In essence, the study of the comparative poetics of the Chinese and the western is to solve the difficulty of seeking the same Therefore, the article does not pursue the absolute correspondence or the mechanical equivalent of the term, and according to the original face of the Chinese and Western image theory, carry on the exploration of the same. On the one hand, on the one hand, we find the point of the macro-way in the specific body-examination, and on the other hand, we find the specific party that the two sides embody at the point of the meeting. In this paper, it is proposed that the Chinese and Western image theory should be divided into three aspects: the source of philosophy, the development of the poetics and the self-transcendence. On the other hand, the paper first, on the three aspects of "the way of good", "the unity of man and nature", and the construction of the ideal of existence, is the same as that of the "Chinese and Western image of the philosophy level", and the same is different from the other. From the "image" of philosophy to the "aesthetic image", the theory of Chinese and Western images along different lines The traditional image theory of China follows the natural way to achieve the unlimited development of the limited life; the western image theory has a theological base which can not be used, which is full of the creation enthusiasm of the deity creation, and the non-existence of the transcendental body is sought in the continuous enlargement of the subjectivity. In spite of the significant difference in the Chinese and Western "image" theory, both of them have not tasted the same. The short length of Chinese poetics is a rational study object for Chinese poetics, which is based on intuition and lack of category definition and differentiation, and the achievement of the mode of thinking and discourse of Chinese poetics. The image of the western image that can't get rid of the dualistic confrontation, the experience and the transcendental division of the main guest is the image of a "image" that can't get rid of the dualistic confrontation, experience and transcendental division of the main guest. It is expected to be difficult and difficult. Therefore, after the discourse dilemma of both dialysis, this paper presents the purpose of the Chinese and Western image theory to self-transcendence on the degree of the "Huitong". The concrete efforts of the British and American Imagism are based on the traditional Chinese classical poetics, and created the West. This is the first time that the Chinese traditional poetics has realized the influence of the national boundaries, and the theoretical courage and the theory of the Chinese traditional poetics embody the construction of the Chinese modern poetics. It is worth to draw for reference. The image theory of the position of the intuitionism of the west is the crystallization of the deep reflection of the western poetics, which is the theoretical development of maintaining the unity of the image. In a way, the construction of the ideal aesthetic form of the "image" in the Chinese poetics is somewhat different from that of the Chinese poetics. The traditional image theory of China has created the "to the image of the environment" as the highest ideal through the sublimation of the "image" to the "context". The paper, on the one hand, tries to reduce the interference of the inertia of the western mode of thinking in the study of the Chinese traditional literary theory, and tries to reflect the Chinese and Western poetics. On the other hand, on the other hand, in the comparison of the heterogeneity of Chinese and Western poetics and the accessibility of Chinese and Western poetics, it is clear that the Chinese modern literary theory should be constructed with the positioning method, and seek the text of Chinese characteristics
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：I01
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 蔣寅;;原始與會通:“意境”概念的古與今——兼論王國維對“意境”的曲解[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2007年03期
2 王一川;通向中國現(xiàn)代性詩學(xué)[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2001年03期
3 汪裕雄;傳統(tǒng)美學(xué)的“意象中心”說[J];江淮論壇;1991年02期
4 王曉朝;繞不過去的柏拉圖——希臘語動詞eimi與柏拉圖的型相論[J];江西社會科學(xué);2004年02期
5 顧穎;康德與黑格爾審美理想辨異[J];南京師大學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2001年01期
6 朱立元，王文英;試論莊子的言意觀[J];上海社會科學(xué)院學(xué)術(shù)季刊;1994年04期
7 陳明華;;跨文化的詩學(xué)復(fù)古——解析意象派與中國古典詩歌意象藝術(shù)的詩學(xué)流變[J];肇慶學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年01期
8 王玉琴;;“境界”與“意境”——《人間詞話》的核心范疇辨析[J];天府新論;2010年04期
9 杰夫·特威切爾 ,張子清;龐德的《華夏集》和意象派詩[J];外國文學(xué)評論;1992年01期
10 鄧曉芒;;康德的“智性直觀”探微[J];文史哲;2006年01期
，本文編號：2483008
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/yishull/2483008.html
最近更新
教材專著
