女性寫作話語策略
發(fā)布時間：2018-10-25 18:05
【摘要】：女性作為一個性別群體，有史以來一直處于被評判、被表達的社會文化語境。為了找回自我、確立自身，女性試圖以寫作的手段來達到自我講述。但她面臨一個巨大的困境：女性能擁有自己的性別話語嗎?本文宗旨就是考察女性為了建立自己的性別話語，，采用了什么策略以消解顛覆男權文化中心的話語控制。本文分五個部分分別進行論述。第一部分為女性寫作界定和歷史，通過界定與歷史梳理，明確女性寫作的性質(zhì)和意義，這是討論女性寫作話語策略的前提。第二部分是女性寫作話語策略的提出，指出女性早就擁有自己的性別話語，但面臨表述方式的轉(zhuǎn)換，正是在這種轉(zhuǎn)換與相連之間，影響了女性寫作在話語策略上的選擇與運用，但女性寫作是完全可能的。因為關于語言的本質(zhì)、語言的結構、語言與文化權力的關系已有新的認識。第三部分就展開論述女性寫作以小敘事消解大敘事的策略。先指出大/小敘事的本質(zhì)區(qū)別，再指出由于時代、思想哲學思潮的影響大敘事已顯出虛假而小敘事則己具備不容忽視的顛覆能力。接下來本文就集中挖掘女性寫作小敘事的意義以及作為一種策略如何通過改寫／重讀歷史，內(nèi)聚焦的敘事結構方式顯示出對當下男性小敘事的超越，并最終消解男性大敘事。第四部分展開論述女性寫作以非法敞開消解男權中心合法遮蔽的敘事策略。先指出男權合法敘事的虛妄與遮蔽，再指出女性寫作應以非法敞開加以顛覆，接下來分別具體論述女性寫作通過反良母、反貞女、反賢妻的邊緣體驗消解文化中心對女性的形象界定和價值評判，最后還以感受歷史的不同方式指出女性寫作軀體化對男性理性化歷史的消解意義。第五部分則就女性寫作在詞語層面消解邏各斯的策略展開論述。首先指出語言在具體運用中是存有縫隙的，話語權力也是可反控制的，因此女性寫作完全可以不必顧忌所謂男性語言的限制。接著就圍繞女性寫作對詞語系統(tǒng)——象喻系統(tǒng)的解構和重構及對語法邏輯的傾斜使用肯定了女性寫作在具體話語表述上對男權話語權力的有效消解。第六部分是結語。本文力求通過論述肯定女性寫作的有效性。
[Abstract]:As a gender group, women have always been judged and expressed in the sociocultural context. In order to find themselves and establish themselves, women try to achieve self-narration by writing. But she faces a huge dilemma: can women have their own gender discourse? The purpose of this paper is to investigate the strategies adopted by women in order to establish their own gender discourse in order to subvert the discourse control of male dominant cultural center. This article is divided into five parts respectively. The first part is the definition and history of female writing, through defining and historical combing, the author clarifies the nature and significance of female writing, which is the premise of discussing the discourse strategy of female writing. In the second part, the author points out that women have their own gender discourse for a long time, but face the change of expression, which affects the choice and application of female writing in discourse strategy. But it is entirely possible for women to write. Because of the nature of language, the structure of language, the relationship between language and cultural power has a new understanding. The third part discusses the strategy of female writing to dispel the big narrative with small narration. This paper first points out the essential difference between big and small narration, and then points out that because of the times, the influence of ideological and philosophical thoughts on big narration has been shown to be false, while the small narrative has the subversive ability that can not be ignored. Then this paper focuses on the significance of female small narration and how to rewrite / reread the history as a strategy. The narrative structure of internal focus shows the transcendence of the current male small narrative and finally dispels the male grand narrative. The fourth part discusses the narrative strategy of female writing. This paper first points out the falsehood and obscurity of the legal narration of male power, then points out that female writing should be subverted by illegal and open, and then discusses the female writing through anti-good mother, anti-virginity, respectively. The anti-virtuous wife's marginal experience dispels the cultural center's definition of female image and value judgment, and finally points out the significance of female writing somatization to the male rational history in different ways of feeling history. The fifth part discusses the strategy of dissolving logos in female writing. Firstly, it is pointed out that there are gaps in the use of language, and the power of speech is also counter-controllable, so female writing can completely avoid the restrictions of so-called male language. Secondly, the deconstruction and reconstruction of the lexical system-figurative system around female writing and the inclined use of grammatical logic affirm the effective elimination of male power in female writing on specific discourse expressions. The sixth part is the conclusion. This paper tries to affirm the validity of female writing.
【學位授予單位】：廈門大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2001
【分類號】：I04
本文編號：2294418
[Abstract]:As a gender group, women have always been judged and expressed in the sociocultural context. In order to find themselves and establish themselves, women try to achieve self-narration by writing. But she faces a huge dilemma: can women have their own gender discourse? The purpose of this paper is to investigate the strategies adopted by women in order to establish their own gender discourse in order to subvert the discourse control of male dominant cultural center. This article is divided into five parts respectively. The first part is the definition and history of female writing, through defining and historical combing, the author clarifies the nature and significance of female writing, which is the premise of discussing the discourse strategy of female writing. In the second part, the author points out that women have their own gender discourse for a long time, but face the change of expression, which affects the choice and application of female writing in discourse strategy. But it is entirely possible for women to write. Because of the nature of language, the structure of language, the relationship between language and cultural power has a new understanding. The third part discusses the strategy of female writing to dispel the big narrative with small narration. This paper first points out the essential difference between big and small narration, and then points out that because of the times, the influence of ideological and philosophical thoughts on big narration has been shown to be false, while the small narrative has the subversive ability that can not be ignored. Then this paper focuses on the significance of female small narration and how to rewrite / reread the history as a strategy. The narrative structure of internal focus shows the transcendence of the current male small narrative and finally dispels the male grand narrative. The fourth part discusses the narrative strategy of female writing. This paper first points out the falsehood and obscurity of the legal narration of male power, then points out that female writing should be subverted by illegal and open, and then discusses the female writing through anti-good mother, anti-virginity, respectively. The anti-virtuous wife's marginal experience dispels the cultural center's definition of female image and value judgment, and finally points out the significance of female writing somatization to the male rational history in different ways of feeling history. The fifth part discusses the strategy of dissolving logos in female writing. Firstly, it is pointed out that there are gaps in the use of language, and the power of speech is also counter-controllable, so female writing can completely avoid the restrictions of so-called male language. Secondly, the deconstruction and reconstruction of the lexical system-figurative system around female writing and the inclined use of grammatical logic affirm the effective elimination of male power in female writing on specific discourse expressions. The sixth part is the conclusion. This paper tries to affirm the validity of female writing.
【學位授予單位】：廈門大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2001
【分類號】：I04
【引證文獻】
相關期刊論文 前1條
1 李忠清;葉雨青;余佳;;漫談嚴歌的女性關懷及其創(chuàng)作走向[J];青春歲月;2010年16期
相關博士學位論文 前1條
1 任亞榮;20世紀90年代女性小說身體話語[D];上海大學;2007年
相關碩士學位論文 前2條
1 竇冰;雙性同體理論視野中的性別詩學[D];山東師范大學;2009年
2 陳瑛;遮蔽、回歸與性別啟蒙[D];湖南師范大學;2009年
本文編號：2294418
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/yishull/2294418.html
