【摘要】：生態(tài)批評(píng)是在全球性生態(tài)危機(jī)日益嚴(yán)重的語(yǔ)境下、在風(fēng)起云涌的環(huán)保運(yùn)動(dòng)的感召下,文學(xué)界掀起的一股“綠色”批評(píng)浪潮。它是研究文學(xué)和自然之關(guān)系的批評(píng),旨在揭露生態(tài)危機(jī)的思想文化根源,揭示文學(xué)作品中蘊(yùn)含的生態(tài)思想,從而喚醒人們的生態(tài)意識(shí)和實(shí)現(xiàn)人與自然的和諧發(fā)展。 雖然梭羅和陶淵明生活在不同的時(shí)代與國(guó)度,有著不同的寫(xiě)作風(fēng)格,但是他們的生態(tài)思想如同一座橋梁溝通了東西方文學(xué)的交流。本文以生態(tài)批評(píng)為切入點(diǎn),主要采用比較和分析的策略并借助傳記批評(píng)和心理學(xué)批評(píng),挖掘他們作品中體現(xiàn)的生態(tài)意蘊(yùn)。本文認(rèn)為梭羅和陶淵明在自然生態(tài)、精神生態(tài)、以及社會(huì)生態(tài)三個(gè)方面都有著豐富的生態(tài)思想。他們的相通之處在于:充分欣賞自然的價(jià)值,高度尊重自然的法則,和平融洽地回歸自然,物質(zhì)簡(jiǎn)單而精神豐富的自然生活,堅(jiān)持不懈地培養(yǎng)人性的自然。他們的相異之處是他們的生態(tài)思想的來(lái)源以及他們對(duì)社會(huì)現(xiàn)實(shí)的批判。歸納概括起來(lái),他們是兩個(gè)詩(shī)意的棲居者。 本文不僅要探尋梭羅和陶淵明的生態(tài)思想的異同以期更好地理解他們的作品,更重要的是揭示他們的生態(tài)思想的意義,從而為構(gòu)建生態(tài)文明和實(shí)現(xiàn)可持續(xù)發(fā)展提供重要的啟示。本文為梭羅和陶淵明的對(duì)比研究提供全新的視角,希望有助于在生態(tài)危機(jī)時(shí)代進(jìn)行東西方文學(xué)以及文化的深入交流。
[Abstract]:Ecological criticism is a wave of "green" criticism in the context of the increasingly serious global ecological crisis, inspired by the surging environmental movement. It is a criticism of the relationship between literature and nature, which aims at exposing the ideological and cultural roots of the ecological crisis, revealing the ecological thoughts contained in literary works, thus arousing people's ecological consciousness and realizing the harmonious development between man and nature. Although Thoreau and Tao Yuanming lived in different times and countries, they had different writing styles, but their ecological thoughts were like a bridge between eastern and western literature. This paper takes ecological criticism as the breakthrough point, mainly adopts the strategy of comparison and analysis, and with the help of biographical criticism and psychological criticism, excavates the ecological implication embodied in their works. This paper holds that Thoreau and Tao Yuanming have rich ecological thoughts in three aspects: natural ecology, spiritual ecology and social ecology. What they have in common is that they fully appreciate the value of nature, highly respect the law of nature, return to nature peacefully and harmoniously, live a natural life of simple material and spiritual richness, and unswervingly cultivate the nature of human nature. Their differences are the origin of their ecological thoughts and their critique of social reality. To sum up, they are two poetic occupants. This paper not only explores the similarities and differences between Thoreau and Tao Yuanming's ecological thoughts in order to better understand their works, but also reveals the significance of their ecological thoughts, thus providing important enlightenment for the construction of ecological civilization and the realization of sustainable development. This paper provides a new perspective for the comparative study of Thoreau and Tao Yuanming, hoping to help the in-depth exchange of literature and culture between the East and the West in the era of ecological crisis.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東商學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：I0-03;I106

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 盧凌;崇尚自然:梭羅《瓦爾登湖》的審美價(jià)值[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期

2 蘇賢貴;梭羅的自然思想及其生態(tài)倫理意蘊(yùn)[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年02期

3 王挺;在自然造化和人類(lèi)杰作之間——讀梭羅的《瓦爾登湖》[J];浙江廣播電視高等專(zhuān)科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2004年03期

4 李雷;;陶淵明,詩(shī)意的棲居者——生態(tài)美學(xué)視角下的陶淵明及其田園詩(shī)探微[J];大慶師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年02期

5 趙沛霖;;陶淵明的詩(shī)歌創(chuàng)作與人生哲學(xué)[J];南昌大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年02期

6 劉鵬;;從人類(lèi)中心主義到生態(tài)中心主義:梭羅生態(tài)哲學(xué)闡析[J];齊魯學(xué)刊;2009年01期

7 程磊;;論陶淵明的價(jià)值選擇和生命境界——以《形影神》為例[J];山西師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年06期

8 茍小泉;;陶淵明的政治哲學(xué)[J];陜西師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年03期

9 郭旭明;;梭羅的低碳生活——《瓦爾登湖》生態(tài)解讀[J];湖南城市學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 王萍;從中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)哲學(xué)的角度比較陶淵明與梭羅[D];天津師范大學(xué);2005年

2 王永霞;在自然的沉思中相遇—陶淵明與梭羅的自然觀比較論[D];蘭州大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2229639