【摘要】：主體與審美形態(tài)的交互關系是這里所要討論的核心問題。先驗論、本質論長期困擾著美學研究,這使得美學研究常常脫離現(xiàn)實的審美活動。審美在根本上是一個實踐問題而非一個先驗問題。美在審美實踐中生成和發(fā)展。主體是審美實踐的發(fā)起者,審美形態(tài)是審美實踐的文化成果。它們在審美實踐中形成了錯綜復雜的交互關系。深入分析兩者的交互關系及其生成機制和在審美文化中的作用,我們不僅可以更透徹地理解美的生成與發(fā)展,理解美學這門學科,還能更加深入地理解人的主體性以及我們生活在其中的審美文化狀況。 主體與審美形態(tài)是人類審美實踐中的一對重要概念。它們之間的交互關系推動著彼此的發(fā)展與演變,也帶動著審美實踐與審美文化的發(fā)展與演變。通過對這兩者交互關系的深入分析,美學研究中關于主體的問題、美的問題都會以一個新的面貌呈現(xiàn)出來。 主體與審美形態(tài)是文明進程中的重要變量要素。透過這兩者的交互關系,我們既可以理解人的主體意識在審美實踐中對審美形態(tài)生成的創(chuàng)造性作用,同時也可以深入理解審美形態(tài)作為文明的符號表征系統(tǒng)對人的主體性的強大的建構作用。它們既是文明進程的表現(xiàn),也是文明發(fā)展演變的推動力。兩者的交互發(fā)展,保證了文明共同體中主體之間具有相通審美價值觀念與審美實踐,推動文明共同體認可的審美文化的形成,進而保證了文明在審美的維度上的持續(xù)性存在。
[Abstract]:The interaction between subject and aesthetic form is the core issue to be discussed here. The transcendentalism, the essence theory, has puzzled the aesthetic research for a long time, which makes the esthetics research often deviate from the realistic esthetic activity. Aesthetics is fundamentally a practical problem rather than a priori problem. Beauty comes into being and develops in aesthetic practice. Subject is the initiator of aesthetic practice and aesthetic form is the cultural achievement of aesthetic practice. They form a complicated interaction in aesthetic practice. By deeply analyzing the interaction between the two and the mechanism of their formation and their role in aesthetic culture, we can not only understand the formation and development of beauty, but also understand the subject of aesthetics. We can also understand the subjectivity of human beings and the aesthetic and cultural conditions in which we live. Subject and aesthetic form are a pair of important concepts in human aesthetic practice. The interaction between them promotes the development and evolution of each other as well as the development and evolution of aesthetic practice and culture. Through the in-depth analysis of the interaction between the two, the aesthetic research on the subject of the question, the beauty will be a new face. Subject and aesthetic form are important variable elements in the process of civilization. Through the interaction between the two, we can not only understand the creative role of human subjective consciousness in aesthetic practice, but also understand the creative role of human subjective consciousness in the formation of aesthetic form. At the same time, we can also understand that aesthetic form, as a symbol representation system of civilization, plays an important role in the construction of human subjectivity. They are not only the expression of civilization process, but also the driving force of civilization development. The mutual development of the two guarantees the intercommunion of aesthetic values and aesthetic practice between the subjects in the civilized community, promotes the formation of the aesthetic culture recognized by the civilized community, and thus ensures the sustained existence of civilization in the aesthetic dimension.
【學位授予單位】：西北師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：I01

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 聶振斌;什么是審美文化?[J];北京社會科學;1997年02期

2 滕守堯;大眾文化不等于審美文化[J];北京社會科學;1997年02期

3 朱立元;何為“審美文化”[J];大連大學學報;1998年01期

4 王建疆;;審美形態(tài)新論[J];甘肅社會科學;2007年04期

5 楊恩寰;黑格爾論藝術創(chuàng)造的主體性[J];河北大學學報(哲學社會科學版);1984年04期

6 牛軍;;美:來自天人之際的消息——中國審美形態(tài)芻議[J];河北師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2009年06期

7 張瑜;康德論美的鑒賞與創(chuàng)造的主體性[J];湖北大學學報(哲學社會科學版);1988年04期

8 蘇宏斌;;主體性·主體間性·后主體性——當代中國美學的三元結構[J];湖北大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2009年02期

9 李鴻雁;;中西審美主體比較[J];黑龍江社會科學;2007年02期

10 朱曉軍;美學研究的范式轉換:從主體性到主體間性[J];理論學刊;2005年07期

相關碩士學位論文 前6條

1 孫麗巍;“主體性”視野下的康德、克羅齊美學思想[D];黑龍江大學;2001年

2 黃文正;論馬克思的實踐主體性[D];四川師范大學;2005年

3 范玲娜;審美形態(tài)與文化差異[D];西南師范大學;2005年

4 張文通;海德格爾的主體間性美學思想[D];廈門大學;2006年

5 唐傳開;康德哲學主體性思維研究[D];廣西師范大學;2007年

6 高嫻;當代中國草根文化符號的審美研究[D];中南民族大學;2008年

，

本文編號：2219123