本文選題：文學(xué)虛構(gòu) + 浪漫主義��； 參考：《浙江師范大學(xué)》2002年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文分五個(gè)部分。 前面四個(gè)部分是以西方文論為主要對(duì)象，選取幾個(gè)比較 典型的時(shí)段，對(duì)文學(xué)虛構(gòu)理論所作的大致梳理。為了敘述的 方便，這里將它分為四個(gè)時(shí)期：虛構(gòu)理論形成的初期、浪漫 主義時(shí)期、現(xiàn)代主義時(shí)期和后現(xiàn)代主義時(shí)期。在虛構(gòu)理論形 成的初期，關(guān)于文學(xué)虛構(gòu)的言論雖相當(dāng)松散和不成系統(tǒng)，有 些可以說(shuō)還尚未具備理論的品格，，但由于對(duì)后來(lái)的虛構(gòu)理論 研究有著非常深遠(yuǎn)的影響，它們本身的價(jià)值卻是不容置疑的。 在浪漫主義時(shí)期，文學(xué)虛構(gòu)理論較以前發(fā)生了很大的變化， 虛構(gòu)不僅獲得了文論家和作家的普遍重視，而且被視為詩(shī)人 和作家表現(xiàn)主體創(chuàng)造性的一種重要手段。到了現(xiàn)代主義時(shí)期， 眾多的文論家和美學(xué)家開(kāi)始更多地從作品的層面思考文學(xué)虛 構(gòu)問(wèn)題。他們把虛構(gòu)視為作品獲得文學(xué)性的根據(jù)，虛構(gòu)也因 此具有了本體論意義。而到了后現(xiàn)代主義時(shí)期，在那種消解 一切，包括文學(xué)與非文學(xué)、虛構(gòu)與非虛構(gòu)的狀況下，一切都 成了虛構(gòu)，文學(xué)虛構(gòu)開(kāi)始失去它獨(dú)立的內(nèi)涵，變得無(wú)法進(jìn)行 界定了。 論文的最后一部分是理論分析和評(píng)介，并著重討論文學(xué) 虛構(gòu)理論在現(xiàn)代主義和后現(xiàn)代主義時(shí)期出現(xiàn)對(duì)立狀況的原 因。本文認(rèn)為，之所以出現(xiàn)這種對(duì)立狀況，主要是有以下三 種原因，即與文學(xué)本身的發(fā)展、哲學(xué)觀念的轉(zhuǎn)換以及西方文 論總的發(fā)展趨勢(shì)影響因素有關(guān)。
[Abstract]:This paper is divided into five parts. The first four parts take the western literary theory as the main object and choose several typical periods to sort out the literary fiction theory. For the convenience of narration, it is divided into four periods: the early days of fictional theory, the period of romanticism, Modernism and postmodernism. In the early stages of the formation of fictional theories, although the rhetoric about literary fiction was rather loose and unsystematic, There are some qualities that can be said to have yet to be theoretical, However, because of their profound influence on the later study of fictional theory, their value is indisputable. In the Romantic period, the theory of literary fiction has changed greatly compared with the past. Fiction has not only gained the general attention of literary theorists and writers. Moreover, it is regarded as an important means for poets and writers to express their creativity. By the time of modernism, many literary theorists and estheticians began to think more about literary hypocrisy from the perspective of their works Construction problem. They regard fiction as the basis for literature, and fiction has ontological significance. And then in the post-modernist period, in the sort of situation that dispels everything, including literature and non-literature, fiction and non-fiction, All became fictional, literary fiction began to lose its independent connotation, became unable to define. The last part of the paper is theoretical analysis and review. It also discusses the origin of the opposites between modernism and postmodernism. This paper holds that the main reasons for this antagonism are the following three reasons, namely, the development of literature itself. The change of philosophy concept and the influence factors of the general development trend of western literary theory are related.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2002
【分類號(hào)】：I04

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 周憲;現(xiàn)代性的張力──現(xiàn)代主義的一種解讀[J];文學(xué)評(píng)論;1999年01期

本文編號(hào)：2118182