本文關(guān)鍵詞： �？� 話語(yǔ) 考古學(xué) 權(quán)力 文學(xué)話語(yǔ)　出處：《河北師范大學(xué)》2004年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：語(yǔ)言作為一個(gè)思考維度，在后現(xiàn)代愈受關(guān)注，許多思想家都對(duì)語(yǔ)言進(jìn)行闡釋，提供了諸多理解世界的視角。米歇爾·�？�，這位天才的法國(guó)思想家，也關(guān)注著語(yǔ)言，他在知識(shí)和真理之間開辟出屬于自己的話語(yǔ)領(lǐng)域。在后現(xiàn)代的氛圍中，�？碌脑捳Z(yǔ)突破本質(zhì)、總體性、真理、主體等一系列形而上的觀念，力求提供一種多元的方法，使所有的聲音都有平等地走入歷史的可能。 本文即是從�？碌倪@一理想入手，從“話語(yǔ)的解放”到“話語(yǔ)自主分析”再到“權(quán)力話語(yǔ)分析”，，論述了考古學(xué)方法下話語(yǔ)何以可能、權(quán)力介入后話語(yǔ)與非話語(yǔ)的相互控制，表明話語(yǔ)分析的目標(biāo)不是符號(hào)下的意義，而是促成話語(yǔ)可能的條件。條件的探詢揭露了一切不證自明的東西是建構(gòu)的結(jié)果，展示了�？略捳Z(yǔ)理論的獨(dú)特性、重要性與其中的思想方法。接著本文從“作者功能化”、“文學(xué)神圣性的消解”、“權(quán)力話語(yǔ)下的文學(xué)”等幾個(gè)角度，分析了在這一話語(yǔ)理論的思維框架中，�？卤救说奈膶W(xué)思考以及對(duì)文學(xué)可能產(chǎn)生的影響，結(jié)語(yǔ)本文又分析了中國(guó)的文化、文學(xué)、批評(píng)可能呈現(xiàn)的前景和應(yīng)有的策略，并對(duì)�？略捳Z(yǔ)理論簡(jiǎn)評(píng)。
[Abstract]:Language, as a dimension of thinking, is getting more and more attention in post-modern times, and many thinkers have interpreted it, providing a lot of perspective on understanding the world. Michele Foucault, a talented French thinker, is also concerned with language. He opens up his own discourse field between knowledge and truth. In the post-modern atmosphere, Foucault's discourse breaks through a series of metaphysical concepts, such as essence, totality, truth, subject, and so on, in an effort to provide a pluralistic method. It is possible for all voices to go into history on an equal footing. This paper begins with Foucault's ideal, from "liberation of discourse" to "analysis of discourse autonomy" to "discourse analysis of power", and discusses how discourse is possible under the method of archaeology, and the mutual control between discourse and non-utterance after power intervention. It shows that the goal of discourse analysis is not the meaning under the symbol, but the conditions that contribute to the possibility of the discourse. The inquiry of the conditions reveals that all the unproved self-evident things are the result of construction, which shows the uniqueness of Foucault's discourse theory. Then, from the perspectives of "author functionalization", "the deconstruction of the sanctity of literature" and "literature under the discourse of power", this paper analyzes the thinking framework of this discourse theory. Foucault's own literary thinking and its possible influence on literature. In conclusion, this paper analyzes Chinese culture, literature, the prospect and strategy of criticism, and gives a brief review of Foucault's discourse theory.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2004
【分類號(hào)】：I0

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 姚萍;對(duì)真理定義的再認(rèn)識(shí)——后現(xiàn)代對(duì)真理“質(zhì)疑”引起的思考[J];南通職業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2002年03期

本文編號(hào)：1554500