本文選題：花雅之爭(zhēng) + 名實(shí)　； 參考：《戲劇藝術(shù)》2014年06期

【摘要】："花雅之爭(zhēng)"是清代戲曲史的重要術(shù)語(yǔ)。目前,學(xué)界對(duì)"花雅之爭(zhēng)"的觀照越來(lái)越全面,但將這些研究成果統(tǒng)而觀之則會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn),"花雅之爭(zhēng)"的提法不但存在名實(shí)不符的問(wèn)題,而且遮蔽了花、雅之間的融合以及花部之間遠(yuǎn)為激烈的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)關(guān)系�；ú俊⒀挪吭诔鞘信c農(nóng)村,南方與北方,在宮廷、文人、民間不同的文化空間里都有其錯(cuò)綜復(fù)雜的發(fā)展軌跡,"花雅之爭(zhēng)"不足以概括當(dāng)時(shí)全國(guó)戲曲發(fā)展的多面相。"花雅之爭(zhēng)"研究中的這些"歧見(jiàn)",恰恰完成了對(duì)"花雅之爭(zhēng)"術(shù)語(yǔ)的解構(gòu)。
[Abstract]:"the dispute of flower elegance" is an important term in the history of opera in Qing Dynasty. At present, the academic circles pay more and more attention to the argument of "flower and elegance". However, if the research results are taken as a whole, it will be found that the formulation of "the dispute of flower and elegance" has not only the problem of discrepancy between the name and reality, but also obscured the flower. The fusion of elegance and the far-fierce competition between flower departments. The flower department, the elegant department in the city and the countryside, the south and the north, in the court, the literati, the folk different cultural space all has its complex development trace, "the flower elegant dispute" is not enough to generalize the national opera development multi-facet. These differences of opinion in the study of the dispute of flower elegance have precisely completed the deconstruction of the terms of the dispute of flower elegance.
【作者單位】： 河北師范大學(xué);
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金青年項(xiàng)目“元曲曲牌傳播研究”(11CZW037)相關(guān)性成果
【分類號(hào)】：J809.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 路應(yīng)昆;;昆劇之“雅”與“花雅之爭(zhēng)”另議[J];東南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年04期

2 朱家n，

本文編號(hào)：2088284