本文以全新的視角來研讀這兩部流傳已久、膾炙人口的游記巨著,通過故事情節(jié)、主人公、語體風(fēng)格、社會意義、宗教信仰、及小說結(jié)局等方面比較研究二者的主題,結(jié)合原有的一些觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)一步探討,試圖填補(bǔ)將此兩部巨著進(jìn)行比較研究的學(xué)術(shù)空白,找出其異同點(diǎn)和帶來這些異同點(diǎn)的具體原因�！段饔斡洝泛汀豆素惱�?費(fèi)恩歷險(xiǎn)記》這兩部巨著,雖然產(chǎn)生于不同的國度環(huán)境和時代背景,但經(jīng)過多次仔細(xì)閱讀和研究,筆者發(fā)現(xiàn)它們存在著很多的可聯(lián)系之處,其中包括很多相似之處,尤其是這兩部巨著深邃而多層次的主題之間,存在著文學(xué)研究上的可比性。這兩部作品在各自的文學(xué)史上,甚至在世界文學(xué)史上,都占有重要的地位。它們持久的魅力和強(qiáng)大的生命力主要在于它們的主題:深遠(yuǎn)而多角度,歷久禰新,給每個時代的讀者以深刻啟迪。也正因?yàn)檫@個原因,作為屬于全人類和所有時代的兩大奇書,這兩部鴻篇巨制,一直受到中西學(xué)者的重視和矚目。經(jīng)過系統(tǒng)的考察研究,筆者發(fā)現(xiàn)學(xué)術(shù)界對二者的研究盡管很多很深,涉及的視角和層面也很廣泛,但都是分別單獨(dú)地去研究這兩部作品,而對二者進(jìn)行比較研究的工作和著述幾乎沒有。筆者在仔細(xì)對比閱讀和研究后發(fā)現(xiàn):在情節(jié)方面,兩部作品都涉及游記探險(xiǎn),尋求目的地... 

【文章來源】：上海交通大學(xué)上海市 211工程院校 985工程院校 教育部直屬院校

【文章頁數(shù)】：81 頁

【學(xué)位級別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Abstract(Chinese)
Abstract(English)
Acknowledgement
Chapter 1 Introduction
    1.1 General Introduction of Journey to the West
        1.1.1 Identity of the author
        1.1.2 General Intruduction of the work
    1.2 General Introduction of The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
        1.2.1 General Introduction of the author
        1.2.2 General Introduction of the work
    1.3 Introduction to thesis statement
Chapter 2 Comparison on Plots
    2.1 The adventures and regional customs, stories
        2.1.1 In and out the Tang Territory vs. worlds on and off the bank
        2.1.2 Leaving the Tang Territory vs. leaving the bank
    2.2 Battle between the justice and the injustice
        2.2.1 The Monkey King and feudality vs. Huck ( Jim) and the slavery
        2.2.2 Scripture group and human evils, ghosts vs. Huck, Jim and the bank people
    2.3 The kidnapping and rescue of the protagonists
        2.3.1 The kidnapped: Sanzang, the Tang Priest vs. the slave Jim
        2.3.2 The rescuers: The Monkey King and Huck
Chapter 3 Comparison on Protagonists
    3.1 The Monkey King and Huck
        3.1.1 Both “primitive”
        3.1.2 Both rebellious
        3.1.3 Both in pursuit of freedom
        3.1.4 Both with vernacular
        3.1.5 Both as heroic prototype
    3.2 The Tang Priest and the slave Jim
        3.2.1 Both impacted by religion and social systems
        3.2.2 Both partial failures
        3.2.3 80th as wanderers
Chapter 4 Comparison on Type of Writing
    4.1 Type of writing concerning the protagonists
    4.2 General type of writing as a whole
Chapter 5 Comparison on Social Significances
    5.1 Both works revealing the social realities
        5.1.1 The social evils in both adventures
        5.1.2 Adventures of Monkey King and Huck
    5.2 Both works implicit on political malpractices
        5.2.1 Against feudality vs. against slavery
        5.2.2 Agaist Cheng-Zhu Philosophy vs. for democracy
    5.3 Comparison on Religion-Related Aspects
        5.3.1 Profound impacts of Buddhism and Christianity
        5.3.2 Relations between individuality and religion:
            5.3.2.1 The Monkey King and Buddhism vs. Huck and Christianity
            5.3.2.2 The Master Sanzang and Buddhism vs.the Slave Jim and Christianity
Chpter 6 Comparison on the Epilogues
    6.1 Both protagonists being “compromising”
    6.2 Both works leaving imaginational space in the epilogues
Chapter7 Conclusion
    7.1 Conclusion of the research
    7.2 Limitation of this research
    7.3 Suggestions for future researches
Bibliography
Appendixes
    Appendix 1:
    Appendix 2:


【參考文獻(xiàn)】：
期刊論文
[1]理想與現(xiàn)實(shí)的互斥——評《哈克貝利·費(fèi)恩歷險(xiǎn)記》[J]. 朱莉,高英娟.  美與時代. 2004(05)
[2]自由的人格——析《西游記》中孫悟空的人格形象之一[J]. 江少英.  福建師大福清分校學(xué)報(bào). 2004(01)
[3]論明人對《西游記》的認(rèn)識[J]. 王齊洲.  社會科學(xué)研究. 2004(01)
[4]簡評《哈克貝里·費(fèi)恩歷險(xiǎn)記》[J]. 尼瑪布赤.  西藏大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(漢文版). 2002(01)
[5]言為心聲——《哈克貝利·費(fèi)恩歷險(xiǎn)記》的口語化風(fēng)格淺析[J]. 劉永杰,王艷玲.  山東師大外國語學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào). 2001(04)
[6]《哈克貝利·費(fèi)恩歷險(xiǎn)記》中的種族沖突與融合[J]. 王曉莉.  遼寧師專學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版). 2000(05)
[7]《哈克貝利·費(fèi)恩歷險(xiǎn)記》的寫作特點(diǎn)和人物形象[J]. 白逸欣,蔡宏宇.  云南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版). 2000(02)
[8]三棱鏡:說《西游記》旨趣的隱顯多元[J]. 喬力.  東岳論叢. 1999(06)
[9]河與岸的象征意義——小議《哈克貝利費(fèi)恩歷險(xiǎn)記》[J]. 李德娟.  語文學(xué)刊. 1999(04)
[10]《西游記》作者確為吳承恩辨[J]. 蔡鐵鷹.  晉陽學(xué)刊. 1997(02)



本文編號：3495593