本文選題：解構(gòu)主義　切入點：延異　出處：《華北電力大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：《蠅王》是當(dāng)代英國小說家威廉·戈爾丁的經(jīng)典作品，該書出版于1954年，講述了一個情節(jié)簡單但是寓意深刻的故事，作者以寓言故事的形式深刻揭示了人性惡這一主題。自該小說出版以來，《蠅王》引起了國內(nèi)外學(xué)者的廣泛關(guān)注，大量的專著和評論文章從神話原型、心理分析、女性主義、敘事策略等角度對其進行剖析，但是從解構(gòu)主義視角解讀該文本的卻幾乎沒有。 本文運用解構(gòu)主義批評理論，對小說中存在的大量二元對立進行解構(gòu)，，顛覆經(jīng)典二元對立中的等級關(guān)系，同時還借用解構(gòu)主義中的“延異”觀點分析了小說 中存在的不確定性以及模糊性。本文共分為五章。第一章是引言部分，簡要介紹了戈爾丁與《蠅王》，回顧了國內(nèi)國外對《蠅王》的評論，并概述了解構(gòu)主義理論。第二章主要從解構(gòu)主義“延異”的觀點出發(fā)，分析了小說中“火”與“海螺”象征意義的不確定性以及“笑聲”與“野獸”意義的模糊性，從而對傳統(tǒng)的解讀進行了顛覆。第三章分析了故事中的兩組顛覆，即對兒童天真形象的顛覆，對邏各斯中心主義與菲勒斯中西主義的顛覆。該分析消解了兒童優(yōu)于成年人，男性優(yōu)于女性的傳統(tǒng)二元對立觀點。第四章分析了作品中兩組二元對立的融合部分，即善與惡的融合，理性與非理性的融合。通過分析發(fā)現(xiàn)，人是善與惡、理性與非理性的融合，二元對立之間并沒有明確的界限。第五章是結(jié)論。結(jié)語對上述章節(jié)進行了歸納和總結(jié)，通過對《蠅王》的解構(gòu)主義釋讀發(fā)現(xiàn)該小說體現(xiàn)了作者對人性的一種矛盾觀點，即人是善與惡的融合，這也是對該小說傳統(tǒng)人性惡主題解讀的一種顛覆。解構(gòu)主義釋讀不僅能豐富小說的內(nèi)涵和主旨,而且將會引發(fā)讀者對人性更深刻的關(guān)注和思考。
[Abstract]:The Lord of the flies is the classic work of William Golding, a contemporary British novelist, published in 1954, which tells a simple but profound story about the theme of human nature in the form of fables.Since the publication of the novel, Lord of the flies has attracted wide attention from scholars at home and abroad. A large number of monographs and commentaries have analyzed it from the perspectives of mythology prototype, psychoanalysis, feminism, narrative strategy, etc.However, there are few interpretations of the text from the perspective of deconstruction.Based on the theory of deconstruction criticism, this paper deconstructs a large number of binary opposites in novels, subverts the hierarchical relations in classical binary antagonism, and analyses the novel by using the viewpoint of "persistence" in deconstruction.Uncertainty and fuzziness.This paper is divided into five chapters.The first chapter is the introduction, briefly introduces Golding and Lord of the flies, reviews the comments of the Lord of the flies at home and abroad, and summarizes the deconstruction theory.The second chapter analyzes the uncertainty of the symbolic meaning of "fire" and "conch" and the fuzziness of the meaning of "laughter" and "beast" from the viewpoint of deconstructionism, thus subverting the traditional interpretation.Chapter three analyzes two groups of subversion in the story, that is, the subversion of the naive image of children, the subversion of logos centrism and Philistinism.The analysis dispels the traditional dichotomy of children over adults and men over women.Chapter four analyzes the fusion of two groups of binary opposites in the works, that is, the fusion of good and evil, and the fusion of rationality and irrationality.Through analysis, it is found that there is no clear boundary between human being and evil, rationality and irrationality.Chapter five is the conclusion.The conclusion sums up and summarizes the above chapters. Through the deconstruction interpretation of the Lord of the flies, it is found that the novel embodies the author's contradictory view of human nature, that is, man is the fusion of good and evil.This is also a subversion of the traditional theme of human nature in this novel.Deconstruction interpretation not only enriches the connotation and purport of the novel, but also causes readers to pay more attention to human nature.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華北電力大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：I561.074

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 王衛(wèi)新;;《蠅王》的女性主義解讀[J];河南大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2006年03期

本文編號：1712010