本文選題：定武蘭亭 + 李文田��； 參考：《美術(shù)觀察》2017年02期

【摘要】：正在書法史尤其是"蘭亭學"的研究領(lǐng)域,清末李文田(1834—1895)跋《定武蘭亭》拓本,質(zhì)疑《蘭亭序》真?zhèn)?是學術(shù)史上的一件大事。眾所周知,在上世紀60年代,南京郊外出土了東晉王興之夫婦、謝鯤墓志后,郭沫若隨即發(fā)表了著名的《從王謝墓志的出土論到蘭亭序的真?zhèn)巍肺恼?《蘭亭論辯》,1973年文物出版社。以下略稱"郭文"),對《蘭亭序》的真?zhèn)翁岢鰬岩?從而在中國的文化界和學術(shù)界中引發(fā)了一場有關(guān)《蘭亭序》真?zhèn)蔚拇筠q論,這場辯論意義重大,影響深遠。正因為郭文中抄錄了"李文田跋汪中舊藏定武蘭亭"
[Abstract]:In the field of calligraphy history, especially in the study of Lanting, Li Wentian Li Wentian 1834-1895) postscript "Ding Wu Lan Ting" to question the authenticity of "Orchid Pavilion Preface" is a major event in academic history. As we all know, in the 1960s, after the tomb of Xie Kun, a couple of Wang Xing of the Eastern Jin Dynasty, was unearthed on the outskirts of Nanjing, Guo Moruo then published a famous article "from the unearthed epitaph of Wang Xie to the authenticity of the Orchid Pavilion" (debate on Lanting, 1973 Cultural relics Publishing House). The following is referred to as "Guo Wen", who doubts the authenticity of "Orchid Pavilion", thus causing a great debate on the authenticity of "Orchid Pavilion" in Chinese cultural and academic circles. This debate is of great significance and far-reaching influence. Because Guo Wen-wen copied "Li Wentian and Wangzhongjiu Zang Ding Wulanting"
【作者單位】： 廣州美術(shù)學院;
【分類號】：J292.1

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 ;名家臨名帖——趙孟，

本文編號：1895978