本文選題：無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任　切入點(diǎn)：因果關(guān)系　出處：《蘭州大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著我國(guó)工業(yè)的發(fā)展和城市化進(jìn)程的加快,人民的生活水平不斷提高。裝修房屋成了一種時(shí)尚,但隨之而來(lái)的環(huán)境污染事件,特別是房屋裝修引起的內(nèi)污染事件卻日益增多,成了近年來(lái)的熱點(diǎn)。環(huán)境污染糾紛的解決日益迫切,出于環(huán)境污染侵權(quán)行為的復(fù)雜性、高度危險(xiǎn)性和因果關(guān)系的難以證明性,往往使此類案件久拖不決,受害者的權(quán)益得不到保護(hù)。解決此類問(wèn)題的關(guān)鍵和難點(diǎn)在于因果關(guān)系的認(rèn)定。本文通過(guò)對(duì)劉女士訴安利公司一案的法律分析,對(duì)環(huán)境污染引起的侵權(quán)案件的因果關(guān)系判定問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了研究。文章闡述了因果關(guān)系理論分析,國(guó)內(nèi)外的學(xué)說(shuō)及在我國(guó)的法律適用,討論了環(huán)境法在環(huán)境侵權(quán)方面的些不同于普通民事法律的特殊規(guī)則,諸如無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任、侵權(quán)責(zé)任的構(gòu)成要件不以違法性為必要等等.得出我國(guó)解決環(huán)境侵權(quán)案件采用無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則和推定因果關(guān)系說(shuō)的結(jié)論。對(duì)環(huán)境侵權(quán)受害人權(quán)益的維護(hù)具有非常重要的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義. 本文第一章簡(jiǎn)單介紹了本案案情及審理情況。第二章對(duì)本案審理的爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)進(jìn)行分析。利用化學(xué)知識(shí)介紹污染物對(duì)人體的傷害,通過(guò)國(guó)內(nèi)外的學(xué)說(shuō)和事例,進(jìn)一步分析了本案歸責(zé)原則的適用及因果關(guān)系認(rèn)定的合理性。第三章是由案例引發(fā)的思考和建議。探討如何預(yù)防和減少室內(nèi)環(huán)境污染對(duì)人體的傷害,根據(jù)目前的立法現(xiàn)狀提出了幾點(diǎn)立法建議,進(jìn)一步完善法律體制,以求更多環(huán)境污染受害者的利益得以有效和及時(shí)的保護(hù)。結(jié)語(yǔ)部分用簡(jiǎn)短的語(yǔ)句對(duì)全文的觀點(diǎn)加以總結(jié),結(jié)束全文。
[Abstract]:With the development of industry and the acceleration of urbanization, people's living standard is improving.Decorating houses has become a kind of fashion, but the environmental pollution events, especially the interior pollution events caused by house decoration are increasing day by day, which has become a hot spot in recent years.The settlement of environmental pollution disputes is increasingly urgent. Because of the complexity of environmental pollution tort, the high risk and the hard proof of causality, this kind of cases is often delayed for a long time and the rights and interests of the victims can not be protected.The key and difficulty to solve this kind of problem lies in the confirmation of causality.Based on the legal analysis of Ms. Liu v. Amway Company, this paper makes a study on the causality of the infringement cases caused by environmental pollution.This paper expounds the theoretical analysis of causality, the domestic and foreign theories and the application of law in our country, and discusses some special rules of environmental law in environmental tort, such as no-fault liability, which are different from ordinary civil law.The constitution of tort liability is not necessary to be illegal and so on.The conclusion is that the principle of no-fault liability and the theory of presumption of causality are adopted to solve the environmental tort cases in China.The protection of the rights and interests of the victims of environmental infringement has very important practical significance.The first chapter briefly introduces the facts of the case and the trial.The second chapter analyzes the dispute focus of this case.This paper introduces the harm of pollutants to human body by means of chemical knowledge, and through the theories and examples at home and abroad, further analyzes the application of the principle of imputation in this case and the reasonableness of the determination of causality.The third chapter is the case-induced thinking and suggestions.This paper probes into how to prevent and reduce the harm of indoor environmental pollution to human body, and puts forward some legislative suggestions according to the present legislative situation, and further consummates the legal system so as to ensure the effective and timely protection of the interests of more victims of environmental pollution.The conclusion part summarizes the views of the full text with brief sentences and concludes the full text.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D923;D922.68

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 涂永前;韓梅潔;;潛伏性毒物致害侵權(quán)類型之環(huán)境毒物致害侵權(quán)研究[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年04期

2 王君鳳;;自助游事故中的責(zé)任分析[J];人民司法;2011年02期

3 李雨o，

本文編號(hào)：1727414